Current Opinions on Fracture Follow-up: A Survey of OTA Members Regarding Standards of Care and Implications for Clinical Research

被引:15
作者
Ricci, William M. [1 ]
Black, James C. [1 ]
Tornetta, Paul, III [2 ]
Gardner, Michael J. [1 ]
McAndrew, Christopher M. [1 ]
Sanders, Roy W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Washington Univ Orthopaed, Campus Box 8233,660 South Euclid Ave, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Boston, MA USA
[3] Tampa Gen Hosp, Florida Orthopaed Inst, Orthopaed Trauma Serv, Tampa, FL 33606 USA
关键词
fracture healing; survey; radiographic timing; fracture follow-up; research; ORTHOPEDIC TRAUMA ASSOCIATION; TRIALS; FIXATION; SURGEONS; PART;
D O I
10.1097/BOT.0000000000000478
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To determine current practice standards among Orthopaedic Trauma Association surgeons for postoperative fracture follow-up and to investigate the implications of these standards on clinical research. Design: Survey. Setting: Web-based survey. Participants: One hundred eighty-four orthopaedic trauma surgeons. Methods: A web-based questionnaire was distributed to Orthopaedic Trauma Association members to identify standard postoperative radiographic and clinical follow-up duration. Assuming uneventful, complete fracture healing at 3 months, data were collected for 3 generic fracture types (diaphyseal, extra-articular metaphyseal, and intra-articular) and 3 specific fractures (femoral shaft, intertrochanteric, and tibial plateau). Suggested follow-up for clinical research was also investigated. Results: For extra-articular fractures, standard radiographic and clinical follow-up were considered to be 6 months or less by greater than 70% of respondents. For intra-articular fractures, standard radiographic and clinical follow-up was considered to be 6 months or less by greater than 39% of respondents. The most common responses for radiographic follow-up were 3 months for extra-articular fractures (33%) and 12 months for intra-articular fractures (34%). The most common responses for clinical follow-up were 6 months for extra-articular fractures (37%) and 12 months for intra-articular fractures (35%). The majority (55%) indicated that follow-up to clinical and radiographic healing or the establishment of a nonunion should be the minimum follow-up for clinical fracture studies and 66% recommended follow-up to at least 1 year for functional outcome studies. Conclusions: Most surgeons follow-up patients with lower extremity extra-articular fractures (with uneventful healing) radiographically for 3-6 months and clinically for 6 months and slightly longer for intra-articular fractures. Many surgeons cease radiographic and clinical follow-up by 6 months. Therefore, retrospective fracture healing studies can only reasonably expect follow-up for 6 months. Publication requirements for longer follow-up of fracture-related studies would likely eliminated retrospective studies from consideration. Most surgeons support obtaining at least 1-year follow-up for clinical studies that include functional outcome. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:E100 / E105
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], ORTHOPEDICS
  • [2] Factors Associated With Surgeon Referral for Physical Therapy in Patients With Traumatic Lower-Extremity Injury: Results of a National Survey of Orthopedic Trauma Surgeons
    Archer, Kristin R.
    MacKenzie, Ellen J.
    Bosse, Michael J.
    Pollak, Andrew N.
    Riley, Lee H., III
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2009, 89 (09): : 893 - 905
  • [3] A lack of consensus in the assessment of fracture healing among orthopedic surgeons
    Bhandari, M
    Guyatt, GH
    Swiontkowski, MF
    Tornetta, P
    Sprague, S
    Schemitsch, EH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2002, 16 (08) : 562 - 566
  • [4] Variability in the assessment of fracture-healing in orthopaedic trauma studies
    Corrales, Luis A.
    Morshed, Saam
    Bhandari, Mohit
    Miclau, Theodore, III
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2008, 90A (09) : 1862 - 1868
  • [5] When Is a Fracture Healed? Radiographic and Clinical Criteria Revisited
    Dijkman, Bernadette G.
    Sprague, Sheila
    Schemitsch, Emil H.
    Bhandari, Mohit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2010, 24 : S76 - S80
  • [6] The check X-ray: An unnecessary investigation after hip fracture fixation?
    Haddad, FS
    Williams, RL
    Prendergast, CM
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 1996, 27 (05): : 351 - 352
  • [7] Routine radiography following ankle fracture fixation: a case for limiting its use
    Harish, S
    Vince, AS
    Patel, AD
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 1999, 30 (10): : 699 - 701
  • [8] Are Large Fracture Trials Possible?
    Jeray, Kyle J.
    Tanner, Stephanie
    Schemitsch, Emil H.
    Bhandari, Mohit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2010, 24 : S87 - S92
  • [9] Outcomes Assessment in Fracture Healing Trials: A Primer
    Kooistra, Bauke W.
    Sprague, Sheila
    Bhandari, Mohit
    Schemitsch, Emil H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2010, 24 : S71 - S75
  • [10] Luttrell K, 2014, J ORTHOP TRAUMA, V28, pE221, DOI 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000080