Health promotion partnerships in Israel: motives, enhancing and inhibiting factors, and modes of structure

被引:9
作者
Baron-Epel, O
Drach-Zahavy, A
Peleg, H
机构
[1] Univ Haifa, Fac social Welf & Hlth Studies, Cheryl Spencer Dept Nursing, IL-31905 Haifa, Israel
[2] Minist Hlth, Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
barriers; health promotion; partnerships; structure;
D O I
10.1093/heapro/18.1.15
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Multisectoral cooperation is an important strategy in working for health promotion. Fifty-two health professionals completed a questionnaire measuring factors motivating, enhancing and inhibiting partnerships. The respondents also reported the type or structure of the partnerships. The results indicated that partnerships were formed primarily in order to promote the project; however, previous positive experience with partnerships was also very important as a motivating force for joining partnerships. The three most important facilitating factors were related to project management: effective leadership, aims of the project, and sharing a vision and goals. The two most frequent items mentioned as very important barriers to partnerships were related to dysfunction of the steering committee. Two types or structures of partnerships were identified. The first was fragmental, where partnerships existed only at specific stages of the project; most respondents reported working within this structure. The second type was continuous, where partnerships existed through all the project's stages. Using multiple regression analysis we found that health staff (mainly nurses) worked more frequently in fragmental partnership structures than did health promotion and welfare workers. In addition, the more experienced the respondents, the less they worked in fragmental partnership structures. These results highlight the importance of acquiring skills for working in partnerships and indicate a need for guidelines to be agreed by the partners at the beginning of the working process.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 23
页数:9
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Ancona DG, 1998, RES MANAG GRP TEAM, V1, P21
[2]  
[Anonymous], GOING INTERPROFESSIO
[3]   Perceived ownership in a community coalition [J].
Armbruster, C ;
Gale, B ;
Brady, J ;
Thompson, N .
PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING, 1999, 16 (01) :17-22
[4]   CINCH: An urban coalition for empowerment and action [J].
Butterfoss, FD ;
Morrow, AL ;
Rosenthal, J ;
Dini, E ;
Crews, RC ;
Webster, JD ;
Louis, P .
HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 1998, 25 (02) :212-225
[5]   Effectiveness of alliances and partnerships for health promotion [J].
Gillies, P .
HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, 1998, 13 (02) :99-120
[6]  
Gray B., 1989, Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems
[7]  
GREEN J, 2000, HLTH ED J, V59, P23
[8]   A multiple case study of implementation in 10 local Project ASSIST coalitions in North Carolina [J].
Kegler, MC ;
Steckler, A ;
Malek, SH ;
McLeroy, K .
HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 1998, 13 (02) :225-238
[9]   Factors that contribute to effective community health promotion coalitions: A study of 10 project ASSIST coalitions in North Carolina [J].
Kegler, MC ;
Steckler, A ;
McLeroy, K ;
Malek, SH .
HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 1998, 25 (03) :338-353
[10]   Partnership synergy: A practical framework for studying and strengthening the collaborative advantage [J].
Lasker, RD ;
Weiss, ES ;
Miller, R .
MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2001, 79 (02) :179-+