Estimating Sightability for Helicopter Surveys Using Surrogates of White-Tailed Deer

被引:7
作者
Dyal, Jordan R. [1 ]
Miller, Karl V. [1 ]
Cherry, Michael J. [2 ]
D'Angelo, Gino J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Daniel B Warnell Sch Forestry & Nat Resources, 180 E Green St, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Res Inst, 700 Univ Blvd, Kingsville, TX 78363 USA
关键词
density estimation; detection; Florida; helicopter survey; Odocoileus virginianus; population estimation; sightability; surrogate; AERIAL SURVEYS; MULE DEER; DETECTION PROBABILITY; VISIBILITY BIAS; MARK-RECAPTURE; GROUP-SIZE; ABUNDANCE; MODEL; ELK; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1002/jwmg.22040
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
On large management units where terrain allows observation of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) from the air, helicopter surveys may provide managers with cost-effective and accurate estimates of population abundance; however, imperfect detection of deer introduces negative bias. This can result in potentially inappropriate management recommendations (e.g., harvest prescriptions). Sightability estimators are designed to model detection heterogeneity based on factors that affect observer detection of target animals. Sightability models are widely used to estimate ungulate abundance; however, previous researchers have developed sightability models using radio-collared animals, potentially introducing bias during model development attributed to unaccounted for movement between initial and follow-up flights. Therefore, our objectives were to model detection probability using surrogates of white-tailed deer as a function of covariates including distance from transect, vegetative obstruction, and light conditions to improve population estimates derived from helicopter surveys and apply our final sightability model in operational helicopter surveys. We conducted our study in 2019 on a 399.4-km(2) study area within a 1,210-km(2) cattle ranch in central Florida, USA. We placed 3-dimensional archery targets as surrogates for white-tailed deer at assigned locations unknown to observers across a combination of stratified bins of vegetative obstruction and distances from the transect. Our top model indicated that distance from the transect and vegetative obstruction negatively affected detection of deer. Detection probability on the flight transect ranged from 0.95 (95% CI = 0.89-0.98) for vegetative obstruction 0-25% and distance from transect 0-25 m to 0.05 (95% CI = 0.01-0.18) for vegetative obstruction 76-100% and distance from transect 100-125 m. We applied our sightability model to operational surveys on 3 units, which produced population estimates averaging 26% higher than those derived from uncorrected counts. Observers simultaneously recorded live deer during operational flights, of which 60% of deer groups were observed while stationary. Our methods using stationary surrogates to develop region-specific sightability models could be used in other study areas to account for imperfect detection of white-tailed deer. (c) 2021 The Wildlife Society.
引用
收藏
页码:887 / 896
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] HYBRIDS OF WHITE-TAILED AND MULE DEER IN WESTERN WYOMING
    KAY, CE
    GREAT BASIN NATURALIST, 1992, 52 (03): : 290 - 292
  • [22] Habitat Interference by Axis Deer on White-Tailed Deer
    Faas, Clinton J.
    Weckerly, Floyd W.
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2010, 74 (04) : 698 - 706
  • [23] Localized removal affects white-tailed deer space use and contacts
    Tosa, Marie I.
    Schauber, Eric M.
    Nielsen, Clayton K.
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 81 (01) : 26 - 37
  • [24] SELENIUM STATUS OF WHITE-TAILED DEER IN SOUTHERN FLORIDA
    MCDOWELL, LR
    FORRESTER, DJ
    LINDA, SB
    WRIGHT, SD
    WILKINSON, NS
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES, 1995, 31 (02) : 205 - 211
  • [25] Anesthesia in female white-tailed deer using Telazol® and xylazine
    Murray, S
    Monfort, SL
    Ware, L
    McShea, WJ
    Bush, M
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES, 2000, 36 (04) : 670 - 675
  • [26] Enumerating White-Tailed Deer Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
    Preston, Todd M.
    Wildhaber, Mark L.
    Green, Nicholas S.
    Albers, Janice L.
    Debenedetto, Geoffrey P.
    WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2021, 45 (01): : 97 - 108
  • [27] To Jump or Not to Jump: Mule Deer and White-Tailed Deer Fence Crossing Decisions
    Burkholder, Emily N.
    Jakes, Andrew F.
    Jones, Paul F.
    Hebblewhite, Mark
    Bishop, Chad J.
    WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2018, 42 (03): : 420 - 429
  • [28] Population effects of white-tailed deer dispersal
    Rosenberry, CS
    Lancia, RA
    Conner, MC
    WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 1999, 27 (03) : 858 - 864
  • [29] Translocating captive female white-tailed deer
    Elliott, Jace R.
    Newbolt, Chad H.
    Gulsby, William D.
    Ditchkoff, Stephen S.
    WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2023, 50 (02) : 108 - 119
  • [30] A review of color vision in white-tailed deer
    VerCauteren, KC
    Pipas, MJ
    WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2003, 31 (03): : 684 - 691