Tumor volume as outcome determinant in patients treated with chemoradiation for locally advanced esophageal cancer

被引:38
作者
Crehange, Gilles
Bosset, Mathieu
Fabrice, Lorchel
Buffet-Miny, Joelle
Dumas, Jean Luc
Mercier, Mariette
Puyraveau, Marc
Maingon, Philippe
Bosset, Jean Francois
机构
[1] Besancon Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Besancon, France
[2] Univ Franche Comte, Dept Biostat, F-25030 Besancon, France
[3] Ctr Georges Francois Leclerc, Dept Radiat Oncol, Dijon, France
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS | 2006年 / 29卷 / 06期
关键词
esophageal cancer; locally advanced; chemoradiation; prognostic factors; tumor volume;
D O I
10.1097/01.coc.0000242346.25229.48
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: The currently used tumor-node metastasis (TNM) staging method is generally not applicable to patients with unresectable esophageal carcinomas. There is a need for both an efficient, easy-to-perform clinical classification and for identification of pretherapeutic prognostic factors that would be useful for oncologists, one of which is tumor volume. Methods: Records of 148 patients, admitted to hospital during the period January 1993 to December 2001, were evaluated retrospectively. Median age was 65.7 years (range, 35.5-85.5 years). Most patients had SCC (84.5%). Using the computed tomography (CT) scan classification, tumors were recorded as follows: 1 T1, 42 T2, 93 T3, 6 T4, 2 Nx, 72 NO, 74 N 1. Tumor volume from the CT scans was determined as the sum of 2 opposed truncated cones. Median tumor volume was 57.5 cm(3) (range, 0.6-288 cm(3)). Results: Median follow-up was 15.1 month (range, 0.3-82.8 months). Survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 42.5%, 21.6%, and 8%, respectively. Prognostic factors identified by univariate analysis were: dysphagia grade >= 2, other histology than squamous cell, tumor location below the carina, age < 65 years and tumor volume >= 100 cm(3). Prognostic factors identified with multivariate analysis were: dysphagia grade >= 2 (P = 0.013), weight loss >= 10% (P = 0.047), tumor location below the carina (P = 0.002), and tumor volume >= 100 cm(3) (p = 0.041). Conclusions: For patients that the TNM staging system is not applicable, tumor volume is a new powerful determinant of survival. Further clinical trials need to be carried out to validate this prospectively.
引用
收藏
页码:583 / 587
页数:5
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Agresti A., 1990, Analysis of categorical data
[2]  
American Joint Committee on Cancer, 1983, MAN STAG CANC
[3]   Why do patients with weight loss have a worse outcome when undergoing chemotherapy for gastrointestinal malignancies? [J].
Andreyev, HJN ;
Norman, AR ;
Oates, J ;
Cunningham, D .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 34 (04) :503-509
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, 62 ICRU
[5]   Prognostic factors for survival in Stage III non-small-cell lung cancer treated with definitive radiation therapy: Impact of tumor volume [J].
Basaki, K ;
Abe, Y ;
Aoki, M ;
Kondo, H ;
Hatayama, Y ;
Nakaji, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 64 (02) :449-454
[6]  
BEDENNE L, 2002, J CLIN ONCOL, V21, P519
[7]   RISING INCIDENCE OF ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE ESOPHAGUS AND GASTRIC CARDIA [J].
BLOT, WJ ;
DEVESA, SS ;
KNELLER, RW ;
FRAUMENI, JF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1991, 265 (10) :1287-1289
[8]  
Bollschweiler E, 2001, CANCER, V92, P549, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20010801)92:3<549::AID-CNCR1354>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-L
[10]   Chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone in squamous-cell cancer of the esophagus [J].
Bosset, JF ;
Gignoux, M ;
Triboulet, JP ;
Tiret, E ;
Mantion, G ;
Elias, D ;
Lozach, P ;
Ollier, JC ;
Pavy, JJ ;
Mercier, M ;
Sahmoud, T .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 337 (03) :161-167