Intentional rounding: facilitators, benefits and barriers

被引:16
作者
Flowers, Kelli [1 ]
Wright, Kylie [2 ]
Langdon, Rachel [3 ]
McIlwrath, Maureen [4 ]
Wainwright, Craig [5 ]
Johnson, Maree [6 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool Hosp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Liverpool Hosp, Neurosurg, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Ingham Inst, South Western Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Ctr Appl Nursing, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Liverpool Hosp, Clin Governance Unit, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Liverpool Hosp, Resp & Sleep Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Australian Catholic Univ, Ingham Inst, Fac Hlth Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
intentional rounding; midwifery; nursing; patient safety; patient satisfaction; SATISFACTION; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1111/jocn.13217
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aims and objectivesTo describe the implementation, practice and sustainability of Intentional Rounding (IR) within two diverse settings (aged care and maternity). BackgroundThe profile of patients in hospitals has changed over time, generally being more severe, placing heavy demands on nurses' time. Routine non-urgent care is often provided only when there is time. IR has been found to increase both patient and staff satisfaction, also resulting in improved patient outcomes such as reduced falls and call bell use. IR is also used as a time management tool for safe and reliable provision of routine care. MethodsThis descriptive qualitative research study comprised of three focus groups in a metropolitan hospital. ResultsFifteen nurses participated in three focus groups. Seven main themes emerged from the thematic analysis of the verbatim transcripts: implementation and maintenance, how IR works, roles and responsibilities, context and environment, benefits, barriers and legal issues. ConclusionIR was quickly incorporated into normal practice, with clinicians being able to describe the main concepts and practices. IR was seen as a management tool, facilitating accountability and continuity of management support being essential for sustainability. Clinicians reported increases in patient and staff satisfaction, and the opportunity to provide patient education. While patient type and acuity, ward layout and staff experience affected the practice of IR, the principles of IR are robust enough to allow for differences in the ward specialty and patient type. However, care must be taken when implementing IR to reduce the risk of alienating experienced staff. Incorporation of IR charts into the patient health care record is recommended. Relevance to clinical practiceEngaging all staff, encouraging ownership and stability of management are key factors in the successful implementation and maintenance of IR. IR is flexible and robust enough to accommodate different patient types and acuity.
引用
收藏
页码:1346 / 1355
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS foundation trust public inquiry
[2]  
[Anonymous], RES METHODS NURSING
[3]  
Braide Mark, 2013, Nurs Times, V109, P16
[4]  
Braun V, 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
[5]   Change for the better: An innovative Model of Care delivering positive patient and workforce outcomes [J].
Cann, Tina ;
Gardner, Anne .
COLLEGIAN, 2012, 19 (02) :107-113
[6]  
Dix Greg, 2012, Nurs Times, V108, P14
[7]  
Fitzsimons Beverley, 2011, Nurs Times, V107, P18
[8]   HOURLY ROUNDS: WHAT DOES THE EVIDENCE INDICATE? [J].
Halm, Margo A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2009, 18 (06) :581-584
[9]  
Hutchings M, 2012, HLTH SERVICES J
[10]  
Hutchings Marie, 2013, Nurs Manag (Harrow), V20, P24