The Effects of Pay-for-Performance Programs on Health, Health Care Use, and Processes of Care

被引:248
作者
Mendelson, Aaron [2 ]
Kondo, Karli [1 ]
Damberg, Cheryl [3 ]
Low, Allison [1 ]
Motuapuaka, Makalapua [1 ]
Freeman, Michele [1 ]
O'Neil, Maya [1 ]
Relevo, Rose [1 ]
Kansagara, Devan [1 ]
机构
[1] VA Portland Hlth Care Syst, Mail Code R&D 71,3710 SW US Vet Hosp Rd, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Mail Code MDYCHSE,3181 SW Sam Jackson Pk Rd, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[3] RAND Hlth, 1776 Main St, Santa Monica, CA 90407 USA
关键词
FINANCIAL INCENTIVES; OUTCOMES FRAMEWORK; DIABETES CARE; QUALITY INCENTIVES; HOSPITAL PAY; RISK-FACTORS; LONG-TERM; IMPACT; PHYSICIANS; ENGLAND;
D O I
10.7326/M16-1881
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The benefits of pay-for-performance (P4P) programs are uncertain. Purpose: To update and expand a prior review examining the effects of P4P programs targeted at the physician, group, managerial, or institutional level on process-of-care and patient outcomes in ambulatory and inpatient settings. Data Sources: PubMed from June 2007 to October 2016; MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Business Economics and Theory, Business Source Elite, Scopus, Faculty of 1000, and Gartner Research from June 2007 to February 2016. Study Selection: Trials and observational studies in ambulatory and inpatient settings reporting process-of-care, health, or utilization outcomes. Data Extraction: Two investigators extracted data, assessed study quality, and graded the strength of the evidence. Data Synthesis: Among 69 studies, 58 were in ambulatory settings, 52 reported process-of-care outcomes, and 38 reported patient outcomes. Low-strength evidence suggested that P4P programs in ambulatory settings may improve process-of-care outcomes over the short term (2 to 3 years), whereas data on longer-term effects were limited. Many of the positive studies were conducted in the United Kingdom, where incentives were larger than in the United States. The largest improvements were seen in areas where baseline performance was poor. There was no consistent effect of P4P on intermediate health outcomes (low-strength evidence) and insufficient evidence to characterize any effect on patient health outcomes. In the hospital setting, there was low-strength evidence that P4P had little or no effect on patient health outcomes and a positive effect on reducing hospital readmissions. Limitation: Few methodologically rigorous studies; heterogeneous population and program characteristics and incentive targets. Conclusion: Pay-for-performance programs may be associated with improved processes of care in ambulatory settings, but consistently positive associations with improved health outcomes have not been demonstrated in any setting.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / +
页数:14
相关论文
共 94 条
  • [41] Assessment of a pay-for-performance program in primary care designed by target users
    Kirschner, Kirsten
    Braspenning, Joze
    Akkermans, Reinier P.
    Jacobs, J. E. Annelies
    Grol, Richard
    [J]. FAMILY PRACTICE, 2013, 30 (02) : 161 - 171
  • [42] The Double Edged Sword of Performance Measurement
    Kizer, Kenneth W.
    Kirsh, Susan R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 27 (04) : 395 - 397
  • [43] Kondo K., 2015, Understanding the Intervention and Implementation Factors Associated with Benefits and Harms of Pay for Performance Programs in Healthcare
  • [44] Implementation Processes and Pay for Performance in Healthcare: A Systematic Review
    Kondo, Karli K.
    Damberg, Cheryl L.
    Mendelson, Aaron
    Motu'apuaka, Makalapua
    Freeman, Michele
    O'Neil, Maya
    Relevo, Rose
    Low, Allison
    Kansagara, Devan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 31 : 61 - 69
  • [45] Investigating the relationship between quality of primary care and premature mortality in England: a spatial whole-population study
    Kontopantelis, Evangelos
    Springate, David A.
    Ashworth, Mark
    Webb, Roger T.
    Buchan, Iain E.
    Doran, Tim
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 350
  • [46] Recorded quality of primary care for patients with diabetes in England before and after the introduction of a financial incentive scheme: a longitudinal observational study
    Kontopantelis, Evangelos
    Reeves, David
    Valderas, Jose M.
    Campbell, Stephen
    Doran, Tim
    [J]. BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2013, 22 (01) : 53 - 64
  • [47] Long-Term Effect of Hospital Pay for Performance on Mortality in England
    Kristensen, Soren Rud
    Meacock, Rachel
    Turner, Alex J.
    Boaden, Ruth
    McDonald, Ruth
    Roland, Martin
    Sutton, Matthew
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 371 (06) : 540 - 548
  • [48] Kruse GR, 2013, AM J MANAG CARE, V19, P554
  • [49] Effect of the Pay-for-Performance Program for Breast Cancer Care in Taiwan
    Kuo, Raymond N. C.
    Chung, Kuo-Piao
    Lai, Mei-Shu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2011, 7 (03) : E8S - E15S
  • [50] Lee CY, 2015, AM J MANAG CARE, V21, pE35