The Effects of Pay-for-Performance Programs on Health, Health Care Use, and Processes of Care

被引:248
作者
Mendelson, Aaron [2 ]
Kondo, Karli [1 ]
Damberg, Cheryl [3 ]
Low, Allison [1 ]
Motuapuaka, Makalapua [1 ]
Freeman, Michele [1 ]
O'Neil, Maya [1 ]
Relevo, Rose [1 ]
Kansagara, Devan [1 ]
机构
[1] VA Portland Hlth Care Syst, Mail Code R&D 71,3710 SW US Vet Hosp Rd, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Mail Code MDYCHSE,3181 SW Sam Jackson Pk Rd, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[3] RAND Hlth, 1776 Main St, Santa Monica, CA 90407 USA
关键词
FINANCIAL INCENTIVES; OUTCOMES FRAMEWORK; DIABETES CARE; QUALITY INCENTIVES; HOSPITAL PAY; RISK-FACTORS; LONG-TERM; IMPACT; PHYSICIANS; ENGLAND;
D O I
10.7326/M16-1881
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The benefits of pay-for-performance (P4P) programs are uncertain. Purpose: To update and expand a prior review examining the effects of P4P programs targeted at the physician, group, managerial, or institutional level on process-of-care and patient outcomes in ambulatory and inpatient settings. Data Sources: PubMed from June 2007 to October 2016; MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Business Economics and Theory, Business Source Elite, Scopus, Faculty of 1000, and Gartner Research from June 2007 to February 2016. Study Selection: Trials and observational studies in ambulatory and inpatient settings reporting process-of-care, health, or utilization outcomes. Data Extraction: Two investigators extracted data, assessed study quality, and graded the strength of the evidence. Data Synthesis: Among 69 studies, 58 were in ambulatory settings, 52 reported process-of-care outcomes, and 38 reported patient outcomes. Low-strength evidence suggested that P4P programs in ambulatory settings may improve process-of-care outcomes over the short term (2 to 3 years), whereas data on longer-term effects were limited. Many of the positive studies were conducted in the United Kingdom, where incentives were larger than in the United States. The largest improvements were seen in areas where baseline performance was poor. There was no consistent effect of P4P on intermediate health outcomes (low-strength evidence) and insufficient evidence to characterize any effect on patient health outcomes. In the hospital setting, there was low-strength evidence that P4P had little or no effect on patient health outcomes and a positive effect on reducing hospital readmissions. Limitation: Few methodologically rigorous studies; heterogeneous population and program characteristics and incentive targets. Conclusion: Pay-for-performance programs may be associated with improved processes of care in ambulatory settings, but consistently positive associations with improved health outcomes have not been demonstrated in any setting.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / +
页数:14
相关论文
共 94 条
  • [11] Does Pay-For-Performance Program Increase Providers Adherence to Guidelines for Managing Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Taiwan?
    Chen, Huei-Ju
    Huang, Nicole
    Chen, Long-Sheng
    Chou, Yiing-Jenq
    Li, Chung-Pin
    Wu, Chen-Yi
    Chang, Yu-Chia
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (08):
  • [12] Impact of pay-for-performance on mortality in diabetes patients in Taiwan A population-based study
    Chen, Yu-Ching
    Lee, Charles Tzu-Chi
    Lin, Boniface J.
    Chang, Yong-Yuan
    Shi, Hon-Yi
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (27)
  • [13] A Longitudinal Examination of a Pay-for-Performance Program for Diabetes Care Evidence From a Natural Experiment
    Cheng, Shou-Hsia
    Lee, Tai-Ti
    Chen, Chi-Chen
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2012, 50 (02) : 109 - 116
  • [14] The impact of a pay-for-performance system on timing to hip fracture surgery: experience from the Lazio Region (Italy)
    Colais, Paola
    Pinnarelli, Luigi
    Fusco, Danilo
    Davoli, Marina
    Braga, Mario
    Perucci, Carlo A.
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2013, 13
  • [15] Damberg CherylL., 2014, Measuring Success in Health Care Value-Based Purchasing Programs: Summary and Recommendations
  • [16] Effect of financial incentives on incentivised and non-incentivised clinical activities: longitudinal analysis of data from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework
    Doran, Tim
    Kontopantelis, Evangelos
    Valderas, Jose M.
    Campbell, Stephen
    Roland, Martin
    Salisbury, Chris
    Reeves, David
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 342
  • [17] Effects of pay for performance in health care: A systematic review of systematic reviews
    Eijkenaar, Frank
    Emmert, Martin
    Scheppach, Manfred
    Schoeffski, Oliver
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY, 2013, 110 (2-3) : 115 - 130
  • [18] Using Behavioral Economics to Design Physician Incentives That Deliver High-Value Care
    Emanuel, Ezekiel J.
    Ubel, Peter A.
    Kessler, Judd B.
    Meyer, Gregg
    Muller, Ralph W.
    Navathe, Amol S.
    Patel, Pankaj
    Pearl, Robert
    Rosenthal, Meredith B.
    Sacks, Lee
    Sen, Aditi P.
    Sherman, Paul
    Volpp, Kevin G.
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 164 (02) : 114 - +
  • [19] Paying physicians for high-quality care
    Epstein, AM
    Lee, TH
    Hamel, MB
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 350 (04) : 406 - 410
  • [20] Quality Compensation Programs: Are They Worth All the Hype? A Comparison of Outcomes Within a Medicare Advantage Heart Failure Population
    Esse, Tara
    Serna, Omar
    Chitnis, Abhishek
    Johnson, Michael
    Fernandez, Nelson
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE PHARMACY, 2013, 19 (04): : 317 - 324