Evaluation of Fracture Resistance and Microleakage of Endocrowns with Different Intracoronal Depths and Restorative Materials Luted with Various Resin Cements

被引:35
作者
Ghajghouj, Ouqba [1 ]
Tasar-Faruk, Simge [1 ]
机构
[1] Near East Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, CY-99138 Nicosia, Cyprus
关键词
endocrown; CAD; CAM materials; resin cements; fracture resistance; microleakage; STRENGTH; PEEK; BEHAVIOR; CROWNS;
D O I
10.3390/ma12162528
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to determine the effect of restoration design on the fracture resistance of different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) ceramics and investigate the marginal leakage of endocrowns according to different types of cement. In total, 96 extracted mandibular first premolars were used for fabrication of endocrowns; 48 of the endocrowns were divided into 6 groups (n = 8) according to intracoronal cavity depth (2 and 3 mm) and CAD/CAM ceramics (lithium disilicate IPS e.max-CAD, zirconia-reinforced glass-ceramic Vita Suprinity, and poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK)). Teeth were subjected to a fracture resistance test with a universal test machine following thermo-cycling. Failure modes were determined by stereomicroscope after the load test. The rest of the endocrowns (n = 48) were produced by Vita Suprinity ceramic and divided into 6 groups (n = 8) according to the cement used (Panavia V5, Relyx Ultimate, and GC cement) with intracoronal cavity depths of 2 and 3 mm. Microleakage tests were performed using methylene blue with stereomicroscope after thermo-cycling. Numerical data for both fracture resistance and microleakage tests were obtained and evaluated by three-way ANOVA. PEEK endocrowns had higher fracture resistance compared to lithium disilicate and Vita Suprinity. Panavia V5 cement had the lowest degree of microleakage, while GC cement had the highest. Different intracoronal cavity depths had no correlation with fracture resistance and microleakage.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Abo-Elmaged A, 2015, EGYPT DENT J, V61, P5481
[2]   Mechanical Failure of Endocrowns Manufactured with Different Ceramic Materials: An In Vitro Biomechanical Study [J].
Aktas, Guliz ;
Yerlikaya, Hatice ;
Akca, Kivanc .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2018, 27 (04) :340-346
[3]   Fracture resistance of ceramic and polymer-based occlusal veneer restorations [J].
Al-Akhali, Majed ;
Chaar, Mohamed Sad ;
Elsayed, Adham ;
Samran, Abdulaziz ;
Kern, Matthias .
JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2017, 74 :245-250
[4]   Comparison of Fracture Strength of Endocrowns and Glass Fiber Post-Retained Conventional Crowns [J].
Biacchi, G. R. ;
Basting, R. T. .
OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2012, 37 (02) :130-136
[5]  
Bindl A, 1999, J Adhes Dent, V1, P255
[6]   Microleakage of IPS Empress 2 Inlay Restorations Luted With Self- adhesive Resin Cements [J].
Cal, E. ;
Celik, E. U. ;
Turkun, M. .
OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2012, 37 (04) :417-424
[7]   Effect of Intracoronal Depth of Teeth Restored with Endocrowns on Fracture Resistance: In Vitro and 3-dimensional Finite Element Analysis [J].
Dartora, Nereu Roque ;
de Conto Ferreira, Michele Bertoluzi ;
Mauricio Moris, Izabela Cristina ;
Brazao, Elisabeth Helena ;
Spazin, Aloisio Oro ;
Sousa-Neto, Manoel Damiao ;
Silva-Sousa, Yara Terezinha ;
Gomes, Erica Alves .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2018, 44 (07) :1179-1185
[8]  
Darwish HA., 2017, Futur Dent J, V3, P67, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.FDJ.2017.05.001
[9]   Fracture Resistance and Microleakage of Endocrowns Utilizing Three CAD-CAM Blocks [J].
El-Damanhoury, H. M. ;
Haj-Ali, R. N. ;
Platt, J. A. .
OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2015, 40 (02) :201-210
[10]   Mechanical properties of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic [J].
Elsaka, Shaymaa E. ;
Elnaghy, Amr M. .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2016, 32 (07) :908-914