Validity and Utility of the Test of Creative Thinking Drawing Production for Dutch Adolescents

被引:5
作者
Desmet, Ophelie Allyssa [1 ,3 ,4 ]
van Weerdenburg, Marjolijn [4 ]
Poelman, Mariska [3 ,4 ]
Hoogeveen, Lianne [3 ,4 ]
Yang, Yao [2 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, W Lafayette, IN 47906 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Educ Psychol, Gifted Creat & Talented Studies, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[3] CBO Talent Dev, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
creativity; Test for Creative Thinking-Drawing Production; high ability; identification; intelligence; THRESHOLD HYPOTHESIS; ACADEMIC-ACHIEVEMENT; PERSONALITY-TRAITS; TEACHER RATINGS; INTELLIGENCE; RELIABILITY; IDENTIFICATION; MOTIVATIONS; GIFTEDNESS; PSYCHOLOGY;
D O I
10.1177/1932202X21990099
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
We examined the divergent validity and utility of the Test for Creative Thinking-Drawing Production (TCT-DP) in an identification protocol for high-ability students that included measures of intelligence, school motivation, inquisitiveness, creativity, and academic achievement. Data were collected from seventh-grade students across 6 years (n = 710). Small significant correlations between the different measures indicated that the TCT-DP did measure a construct separate from intelligence, school motivation, inquisitiveness, and academic achievement. Furthermore, creativity did not significantly affect academic achievement when controlling for intelligence, school motivation, and inquisitiveness. We did not find support for threshold theory. Finally, we concluded that the TCT-DP provides useful additional information on creativity for high-ability identification in which measures of intelligence, school motivation, and inquisitiveness are already included. Thus, this study's findings provide evidence for the utility and divergent validity of the TCT-DP when used with a Dutch population.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 290
页数:24
相关论文
共 151 条
[21]   Creativity and Psychopathology: A Shared Vulnerability Model [J].
Carson, Shelley H. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 2011, 56 (03) :144-153
[22]   The Relationship Between Diverse Components of Intelligence and Creativity [J].
Cho, Sun Hee ;
Nijenhuis, Jan Te ;
van Vianen, Annelies E. M. ;
Kim, Heui-Baik ;
Lee, Kun Ho .
JOURNAL OF CREATIVE BEHAVIOR, 2010, 44 (02) :125-137
[23]  
Chouinard MM, 2007, MONOGR SOC RES CHILD, V72, P1
[24]  
Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587
[25]  
Collins MaryAnn., 1999, HDB CREATIVITY, P297, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511807916.017, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511807916.017]
[26]   From STEM to STEAM: Cracking the Code? How Creativity & Motivation Interacts with Inquiry-based Learning [J].
Conradty, Catherine ;
Bogner, Franz X. .
CREATIVITY RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2019, 31 (03) :284-295
[27]  
Cropley A.J., 2000, Roeper Review, V23, P72, DOI DOI 10.1080/02783190009554069
[28]   RELIABILITY AND FACTORIAL VALIDITY OF WALLACH-KOGAN CREATIVITY TESTS [J].
CROPLEY, AJ ;
MASLANY, GW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1969, 60 :395-&
[29]  
Cropley D.H., 2017, Creativity and innovation: Theory, research, and practice, P61, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781003233930
[30]  
Cropley D.H., 2015, Creativity in engineering: Novel solutions to complex problems, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00112-0