Low-carbon city pilot and carbon emission efficiency: Quasi-experimental evidence from China

被引:456
作者
Yu, Yantuan [1 ]
Zhang, Ning [2 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Univ Finance & Econ, Inst Guangdong Econ & Social Dev, Guangzhou 510320, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Inst Blue & Green Dev, Weihai 264200, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Low-carbon city pilot; Carbon emission efficiency; DID; Nonconvex metafrontier; Data envelopment analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105125
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper identifies the causal effect of low-carbon city pilot (LCCP) policy on carbon emission efficiency (CEE). Specifically, we first develop a general nonconvex metafrontier data envelopment analysis model to calculate CEE. We also provide a quasi-experimental evidence using a unique dataset of 251 cities in China during the years 2003 to 2018. Specifically, difference-in-differences (DID) and spatial DID (SDID) estimators are used as the main empirical strategy. We find that the LCCP policy improved CEE by 1.7% which are both economically and statistically significant. Further, its impact on neighbor untreated cities is about 64% of that on the treated cities. Scenario analysis documents that the average carbon dioxide emissions should be mitigated by approximately 8.37 million tons with a CEE increase of 1%, 8.84 million tons with a 2% increase, and 9.31 million tons with a 3% increase. Our findings also indicate that a 1% increase in years relative to a city's carbon dioxide emissions peak year commitment associates with a 1.3% increase in CEE. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Valid Two-Step Identification-Robust Confidence Sets for GMM [J].
Andrews, Isaiah .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2018, 100 (02) :337-348
[2]   A spatial multiple treatment/multiple outcome difference-in-differences model with an application to urban rail infrastructure and gentrification [J].
Bardaka, Eleni ;
Delgado, Michael S. ;
Florax, Raymond J. G. M. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2019, 121 :325-345
[3]   Big Bad Banks? The Winners and Losers from Bank Deregulation in the United States [J].
Beck, Thorsten ;
Levine, Ross ;
Levkov, Alexey .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2010, 65 (05) :1637-1667
[4]   Environmental efficiency analysis and estimation of CO2 abatement costs in dairy cattle farms in Umbria (Italy): A SBM-DEA model with undesirable output [J].
Cecchini, Lucio ;
Venanzi, Sonia ;
Pierri, Antonio ;
Chiorri, Massimo .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 197 :895-907
[5]   A spatial difference-in-differences analysis of the impact of sugarcane production on respiratory diseases [J].
Chagas, Andre L. S. ;
Azzoni, Carlos R. ;
Almeida, Alexandre N. .
REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2016, 59 :24-36
[6]   Can low-carbon city construction facilitate green growth? Evidence from China's pilot low-carbon city initiative [J].
Cheng, Jinhua ;
Yi, Jiahui ;
Dai, Sheng ;
Xiong, Yan .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 231 :1158-1170
[7]  
COCHRAN WG, 1973, SANKHYA SER A, V35, P417
[8]  
Cox D. R., 1958, Planning of Experiments
[9]   Difference-in-differences techniques for spatial data: Local autocorrelation and spatial interaction [J].
Delgado, Michael S. ;
Florax, Raymond J. G. M. .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2015, 137 :123-126
[10]   Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions [J].
Dietz, T ;
Rosa, EA .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1997, 94 (01) :175-179