Evaluating the performance of higher education institutions in Europe: a nonparametric efficiency analysis of 944 institutions

被引:18
作者
Veiderpass, Ann [1 ]
McKelvey, Maureen [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Econ, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Univ Gothenburg, Inst Innovat & Entrepreneurship, Dept Econ & Soc, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
Higher education institutions; OECD countries; technical efficiency; nonparametric analysis; bootstrapping; Eumida database; UNIVERSITIES;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2015.1102844
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Although a long tradition exists of studying the economics of education, performance comparisons of different kinds have traditionally been difficult to undertake. An important impediment has been the lack of comparable data. To a large extent, this study remedies the shortcomings of earlier studies. Our contribution is twofold. First, the current higher education policy of contraction and economizing, common to most European countries, make knowledge of potential efficiency gains crucial. Second, a unique database allows us to study a broad diversity of organizations as well as organizations located in a number of different European countries. The study suggests evaluating higher education institution (HEI) performance in a production theory context, applying the well-known data envelopment analysis (DEA) method to a cross section of 944 HEIs in 17 European countries. The DEA approach is particularly suitable in this context where little is known about production technologies and economic behaviour of the HEIs. On average, provision of education is found to be most efficient in the Slovak Republic followed by Belgium and Latvia, while Denmark and Norway display the lowest efficiency. The study also indicates a positive relation between efficiency and HEI size and efficiency and research intensity. Furthermore, the study points to the importance of continued data collection.
引用
收藏
页码:1504 / 1514
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   The measurement of Italian universities' research productivity by a non parametric-bibliometric methodology [J].
Abramo, Giovanni ;
D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea ;
Pugini, Fabio .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2008, 76 (02) :225-244
[2]   Allocative efficiency in public research funding: Can bibliometrics help? [J].
Abramo, Giovanni ;
D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea ;
Caprasecca, Alessandro .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2009, 38 (01) :206-215
[3]   Heterogeneity and the evaluation of efficiency: the case of Italian universities [J].
Agasisti, Tommaso ;
Johnes, Geraint .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2010, 42 (11) :1365-1375
[4]   Comparing efficiency in a cross-country perspective: the case of Italian and Spanish state universities [J].
Agasisti, Tommaso ;
Perez-Esparrells, Carmen .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 59 (01) :85-103
[5]  
Aghion P, 2010, ECON POLICY, P7
[6]  
[Anonymous], 252012 NIFU
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Assessing Scientific, Reading and Mathematical Literacy: A Framework for PISA 2006, DOI [DOI 10.1787/9789264026407-EN, 10.1787/9789264026407-en]
[8]   SOME MODELS FOR ESTIMATING TECHNICAL AND SCALE INEFFICIENCIES IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS [J].
BANKER, RD ;
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1984, 30 (09) :1078-1092
[9]  
Bogetoft P, 2011, INT SER OPER RES MAN, V157, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-7961-2
[10]  
Bonaccorsi A, 2014, KNOWLEDGE, DIVERSITY AND PERFORMANCE IN EUROPEAN HIGHER EDUCATION: A CHANGING LANDSCAPE, P1