Quebec public funding facilitates fertility preservation for male cancer patients

被引:4
作者
Herrero, M. B. [1 ]
Garcia, A. [1 ]
Buckett, W. [1 ]
Tulandi, T. [1 ]
Chan, P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Ctr Hlth, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Glen Site,Room D05-5724,1001 Decarie Blvd, Montreal, PQ H4A 3J1, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Ctr Hlth, Dept Urol, Glen Site,Room D05-5724,1001 Decarie Blvd, Montreal, PQ H4A 3J1, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Male fertility preservation; costs; assisted reproductive technologies; SPERM BANKING; INFERTILITY; CRYOPRESERVATION; FERTILIZATION; ATTITUDES; SERVICES; MEN;
D O I
10.3747/co.23.2793
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Sperm cryopreservation remains the only clinically feasible option to preserve male fertility. The quality of counselling provided by the treating physicians and the cost of sperm cryopreservation can both influence a patient's decision about whether to preserve sperm. On 5 August 2010, the Quebec government introduced provincial coverage of assisted reproductive technologies, with sperm cryopreservation included as a covered service. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether and how such a program affects the behaviour of cancer patients with respect to sperm cryopreservation. Methods We analyzed the database derived from male patients undergoing sperm cryopreservation from August 2008 to August 2012 at our centre. The retrieved data included patient age, male infertility or oncologic diagnosis, sperm quality parameters, and details about the number of visits for sperm cryopreservation. Results The number of cancer patients who cryopreserved sperm before and after the policy change did not differ significantly, but a marked increase in the number of non-cancer patients was observed. Further analysis revealed that, after implementation of the public funding program, the total number of sperm cryopreservation sessions per patient increased significantly in cancer patients but not in non-cancer patients. Conclusions It appears that cancer patients who are willing to freeze sperm are keen to return for more sessions of sperm banking when no fees are associated with the service. Those findings suggest that cost reduction is an important factor for improving delivery of fertility preservation services to male cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 25
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Facilitators and obstacles to sperm banking in young men receiving gonadotoxic chemotherapy for cancer: the perspective of survivors and health care professionals [J].
Achille, Marie A. ;
Rosberger, Zeev ;
Robitaille, Roxane ;
Lebel, Sophie ;
Gouin, Jean-Philippe ;
Bultz, Barry D. ;
Chan, Peter T. K. .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2006, 21 (12) :3206-3216
[2]   Cryopreservation of sperm: Indications, methods and results [J].
Anger, JT ;
Gilbert, BR ;
Goldstein, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (04) :1079-1084
[3]   The costs and consequences of assisted reproductive technology: an economic perspective [J].
Connolly, Mark P. ;
Hoorens, Stijn ;
Chambers, Georgina M. .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2010, 16 (06) :603-613
[4]   Psychological impact of infertility [J].
Cousineau, Tara M. ;
Domar, Alice D. .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2007, 21 (02) :293-308
[5]   Assisted reproductive outcomes of male cancer survivors [J].
Garcia, Ainhoa ;
Herrero, Maria Belen ;
Holzer, Hananel ;
Tulandi, Togas ;
Chan, Peter .
JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2015, 9 (02) :208-214
[6]  
Government of Quebec, 2015, WELLN PORT ASS REPR
[7]  
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, 2014, IVF CHANC SUCC
[8]   Banking on Fatherhood: pilot studies of a computerized educational tool on sperm banking before cancer treatment [J].
Huyghe, Eric ;
Martinetti, Paul ;
Sui, Dawen ;
Schover, Leslie R. .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2009, 18 (09) :1011-1014
[9]  
Mosalanejad L, 2013, INT J FERTIL STERIL, V6, P224
[10]   Patient Attitudes Toward Fertility Preservation [J].
Schover, Leslie R. .
PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2009, 53 (02) :281-284