Conversions in laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer

被引:27
作者
van der Pas, Martijn H. G. M. [1 ]
Deijen, Charlotte L. [1 ]
Abis, Gabor S. A. [1 ]
de Lange-de Klerk, Elly S. M. [1 ]
Haglind, Eva [2 ]
Fuerst, Alois [3 ]
Lacy, Antonio M. [4 ]
Cuesta, Miguel A. [1 ]
Bonjer, Hendrik J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Sahlgrenska Univ Sjukhuset Goteborg, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Caritas Krankenhaus St Josef Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
[4] Hosp Clin I Prov Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2017年 / 31卷 / 05期
关键词
Rectal cancer; Laparoscopic surgery; Conversion; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES; MRC CLASICC TRIAL; COLORECTAL SURGERY; ASSISTED RESECTION; PATHOLOGICAL OUTCOMES; CLINICAL-TRIAL; MULTICENTER; POPULATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-016-5228-8
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Laparoscopic surgery offers patients with rectal cancer short-term benefits and similar survival rates as open surgery. However, selecting patients who are suitable candidates for laparoscopic surgery is essential to prevent intra-operative conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery. Clinical and pathological variables were studied among patients who had converted laparoscopic surgeries within the COLOR II trial to improve patient selection for laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Between January 20, 2004, and May 4, 2010, 1044 patients with rectal cancer enrolled in the COLOR II trial and were randomized to either laparoscopic or open surgery. Of 693 patients who had laparoscopic surgery, 114 (16 %) were converted to open surgery. Predictive factors were studied using multivariate analyses, and morbidity and mortality rates were determined. Factors correlating with conversion were as follows: age above 65 years (OR 1.9; 95 % CI 1.2-3.0: p = 0.003), BMI greater than 25 (OR 2.7; 95 % CI 1.7-4.3: p < 0.001), and tumor location more than 5 cm from the anal verge (OR 0.5; CI 0.3-0.9). Gender was not significantly related to conversion (p = 0.14). In the converted group, blood loss was greater (p < 0.001) and operating time was longer (p = 0.028) compared with the non-converted laparoscopies. Hospital stay did not differ (p = 0.06). Converted procedures were followed by more postoperative complications compared with laparoscopic or open surgery (p = 0.041 and p = 0.042, respectively). Mortality was similar in the laparoscopic and converted groups. Age above 65 years, BMI greater than 25, and tumor location between 5 and 15 cm from the anal verge were risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic to open surgery in patients with rectal cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:2263 / 2270
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Open Surgery Against Laparoscopic Surgery for Mid-Rectal or Low-Rectal Cancer of Male Patients: Better Postoperative Genital Function of Laparoscopic Surgery
    Liu, Zhihua
    Kang, Liang
    Huang, Meijin
    Luo, Yanxin
    Wang, Lei
    Lan, Ping
    Cui, Ji
    Wang, Jianping
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2015, 25 (05) : 444 - 448
  • [32] Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Tang, Bo
    Lei, Xiong
    Ai, Junhua
    Huang, Zhixiang
    Shi, Jun
    Li, Taiyuan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [33] Laparoscopic surgery after neoadjuvant therapy in elderly patients with rectal cancer
    Yang, Ruiqi
    Qu, Wei
    He, Zhentao
    Chen, Juan
    Wang, Zhongyan
    Huang, Yudong
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2017, 22 (04): : 869 - 874
  • [34] Impact of Increased Body Mass Index on Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer
    Karahasanoglu, T.
    Hamzaoglu, I.
    Baca, B.
    Aytac, E.
    Kirbiyik, E.
    EUROPEAN SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 46 (02) : 87 - 93
  • [35] Outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and the effect of learning curve
    Huang, Yu-Min
    Huang, Yan Jiun
    Wei, Po-Li
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (40)
  • [36] Open versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Advanced Low Rectal Cancer A Large, Multicenter, Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study in Japan
    Hida, Koya
    Okamura, Ryosuke
    Sakai, Yoshiharu
    Konishi, Tsuyoshi
    Akagi, Tomonori
    Yamaguchi, Tomohiro
    Akiyoshi, Takashi
    Fukuda, Meiki
    Yamamoto, Seiichiro
    Yamamoto, Michio
    Nishigori, Tatsuto
    Kawada, Kenji
    Hasegawa, Suguru
    Morita, Satoshi
    Watanabe, Masahiko
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2018, 268 (02) : 318 - 324
  • [37] Robotic-Assisted versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: An Analysis of Clinical and Financial Outcomes from a Tertiary Referral Center
    Gebhardt, Jasper Max
    Werner, Neno
    Stroux, Andrea
    Foerster, Frank
    Pozios, Ioannis
    Seifarth, Claudia
    Schineis, Christian
    Weixler, Benjamin
    Beyer, Katharina
    Lauscher, Johannes Christian
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (06)
  • [38] Results of laparoscopic resection in high-risk rectal cancer patients
    Panteleimonitis, Sofoklis
    Figueiredo, Nuno
    Bhuvanakrishna, Thakshyanee
    Harper, Mick
    Parvaiz, Amjad
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2020, 405 (04) : 479 - 490
  • [39] Current state of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in Australasia
    Ong, Eugene J. S.
    Stevenson, Andrew R. L.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 81 (04) : 281 - 286
  • [40] Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in colon and rectal cancer
    Shin, Jae-Won
    Kim, Seon-Hahn
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 55 (07): : 620 - 628