Conversions in laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer

被引:27
|
作者
van der Pas, Martijn H. G. M. [1 ]
Deijen, Charlotte L. [1 ]
Abis, Gabor S. A. [1 ]
de Lange-de Klerk, Elly S. M. [1 ]
Haglind, Eva [2 ]
Fuerst, Alois [3 ]
Lacy, Antonio M. [4 ]
Cuesta, Miguel A. [1 ]
Bonjer, Hendrik J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Sahlgrenska Univ Sjukhuset Goteborg, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Caritas Krankenhaus St Josef Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
[4] Hosp Clin I Prov Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2017年 / 31卷 / 05期
关键词
Rectal cancer; Laparoscopic surgery; Conversion; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES; MRC CLASICC TRIAL; COLORECTAL SURGERY; ASSISTED RESECTION; PATHOLOGICAL OUTCOMES; CLINICAL-TRIAL; MULTICENTER; POPULATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-016-5228-8
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Laparoscopic surgery offers patients with rectal cancer short-term benefits and similar survival rates as open surgery. However, selecting patients who are suitable candidates for laparoscopic surgery is essential to prevent intra-operative conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery. Clinical and pathological variables were studied among patients who had converted laparoscopic surgeries within the COLOR II trial to improve patient selection for laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Between January 20, 2004, and May 4, 2010, 1044 patients with rectal cancer enrolled in the COLOR II trial and were randomized to either laparoscopic or open surgery. Of 693 patients who had laparoscopic surgery, 114 (16 %) were converted to open surgery. Predictive factors were studied using multivariate analyses, and morbidity and mortality rates were determined. Factors correlating with conversion were as follows: age above 65 years (OR 1.9; 95 % CI 1.2-3.0: p = 0.003), BMI greater than 25 (OR 2.7; 95 % CI 1.7-4.3: p < 0.001), and tumor location more than 5 cm from the anal verge (OR 0.5; CI 0.3-0.9). Gender was not significantly related to conversion (p = 0.14). In the converted group, blood loss was greater (p < 0.001) and operating time was longer (p = 0.028) compared with the non-converted laparoscopies. Hospital stay did not differ (p = 0.06). Converted procedures were followed by more postoperative complications compared with laparoscopic or open surgery (p = 0.041 and p = 0.042, respectively). Mortality was similar in the laparoscopic and converted groups. Age above 65 years, BMI greater than 25, and tumor location between 5 and 15 cm from the anal verge were risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic to open surgery in patients with rectal cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:2263 / 2270
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Conversions in laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer
    Martijn H. G. M. van der Pas
    Charlotte L. Deijen
    Gabor S. A. Abis
    Elly S. M. de Lange-de Klerk
    Eva Haglind
    Alois Fürst
    Antonio M. Lacy
    Miguel A. Cuesta
    Hendrik J. Bonjer
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2017, 31 : 2263 - 2270
  • [2] Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: the verdict is not final yet!
    Shawki, Sherief
    Liska, David
    Delaney, Conor P.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2017, 21 (03) : 241 - 243
  • [3] Scientific evidence for laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery
    Fuerst, A.
    Heiligensetzer, A.
    Sauer, P.
    Liebig-Hoerl, G.
    CHIRURG, 2014, 85 (07): : 578 - 582
  • [4] Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Surgery in Rectal Cancer Compared with Open and Laparoscopic Surgery
    Khajeh, Elias
    Aminizadeh, Ehsan
    Moghadam, Arash Dooghaie
    Nikbakhsh, Rajan
    Goncalves, Gil
    Carvalho, Carlos
    Parvaiz, Amjad
    Kulu, Yakup
    Mehrabi, Arianeb
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (03)
  • [5] Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients
    Gorgun, E.
    Ozben, V.
    Costedio, M.
    Stocchi, L.
    Kalady, M.
    Remzi, F.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2016, 18 (11) : 1063 - 1071
  • [6] The feasibility of laparoscopic extended pelvic surgery for rectal cancer
    Nakamura, Hayato
    Uehara, Keisuke
    Arimoto, Atsuki
    Kato, Takehiro
    Ebata, Tomoki
    Nagino, Masato
    SURGERY TODAY, 2016, 46 (08) : 950 - 956
  • [7] Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: preoperative radiochemotherapy versus surgery alone
    Denost, Quentin
    Laurent, Christophe
    Paumet, Thomas
    Quintane, Laurence
    Martenot, Mathieu
    Rullier, Eric
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (07): : 1878 - 1883
  • [8] Operative and long-term oncological outcomes in patients undergoing robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer
    Bilgin, Ismail Ahmet
    Bas, Mustafa
    Aytac, Erman
    Benlice, Cigdem
    Esen, Eren
    Kirbiyik, Ebru
    Kiziltas, Cansu
    Aghayeva, Afag
    Ozben, Volkan
    Hamzaoglu, Ismail
    Karahasanoglu, Tayfun
    Baca, Bilgi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2020, 16 (06) : 1 - 10
  • [9] Totally Robotic Versus Totally Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer
    Esen, Eren
    Aytac, Erman
    Agcaoglu, Orhan
    Zenger, Serkan
    Balik, Emre
    Baca, Bilgi
    Hamzaoglu, Ismail
    Karahasanoglu, Tayfun
    Bugra, Dursun
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2018, 28 (04) : 245 - 249
  • [10] Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery
    Feroci, Francesco
    Vannucchi, Andrea
    Bianchi, Paolo Pietro
    Cantafio, Stefano
    Garzi, Alessia
    Formisano, Giampaolo
    Scatizzi, Marco
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 22 (13) : 3602 - 3610