The Human Neural Alpha Response to Speech is a Proxy of Attentional Control

被引:83
作者
Woestmann, Malte [1 ]
Lim, Sung-Joo [1 ]
Obleser, Jonas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lubeck, Dept Psychol, Maria Goeppert Str 9a, D-23562 Lubeck, Germany
关键词
acoustic detail; alpha oscillation; attention; speech; working memory; TO-NOISE RATIO; IRRELEVANT SPEECH; WORKING-MEMORY; BAND ACTIVITY; BRAIN OSCILLATIONS; AUDITORY ATTENTION; SPATIAL ATTENTION; ACOUSTIC DETAIL; SERIAL-RECALL; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1093/cercor/bhx074
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Human alpha (similar to 10 Hz) oscillatory power is a prominent neural marker of cognitive effort. When listeners attempt to process and retain acoustically degraded speech, alpha power enhances. It is unclear whether these alpha modulations reflect the degree of acoustic degradation per se or the degradation-driven demand to a listener's attentional control. Using an irrelevant-speech paradigm and measuring the electroencephalogram (EEG), the current experiment demonstrates that the neural alpha response to speech is a surprisingly clear proxy of top-down control, entirely driven by the listening goals of attending versus ignoring degraded speech. While (n = 23) listeners retained the serial order of 9 to-be-recalled digits, one to-be-ignored sentence was presented. Distractibility of the to-be-ignored sentence parametrically varied in acoustic detail (noise-vocoding), with more acoustic detail of distracting speech increasingly disrupting listeners' serial memory recall. Where previous studies had observed decreases in parietal and auditory alpha power with more acoustic detail (of target speech), alpha power here showed the opposite pattern and increased with more acoustic detail in the speech distractor. In sum, the neural alpha response reflects almost exclusively a listener's goal, which is decisive for whether more acoustic detail facilitates comprehension (of attended speech) or enhances distraction (of ignored speech).
引用
收藏
页码:3307 / 3317
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Associations Between Control Beliefs and Response Time Inconsistency in Older Adults Vary as a Function of Attentional Task Demands
    Cerino, Eric S.
    Stawski, Robert S.
    Geldhof, G. John
    MacDonald, Stuart W. S.
    JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2020, 75 (09): : 1819 - 1830
  • [22] Attentional Gain Control of Ongoing Cortical Speech Representations in a "Cocktail Party"
    Kerlin, Jess R.
    Shahin, Antoine J.
    Miller, Lee M.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 30 (02) : 620 - 628
  • [23] Neural bases of enhanced attentional control: Lessons from action video game players
    Foecker, Julia
    Cole, Daniel
    Beer, Anton L.
    Bavelier, Daphne
    BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, 2018, 8 (07):
  • [24] ATTENTIONAL DEPLOYMENT MODULATES THE NEURAL AND SUBJECTIVE RESPONSE TO UNPLEASANT STIMULI
    Ferri, Jamie
    Schmidt, Joseph
    Hajcak, Greg
    Canli, Turhan
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 49 : S56 - S56
  • [25] Impaired neural response to speech edges in dyslexia
    Lizarazu, Mikel
    Lallier, Marie
    Bourguignon, Mathieu
    Carreiras, Manuel
    Molinaro, Nicola
    CORTEX, 2021, 135 : 207 - 218
  • [26] Effects of acoustic periodicity, intelligibility, and pre-stimulus alpha power on the event-related potentials in response to speech
    Steinmetzger, Kurt
    Rosen, Stuart
    BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2017, 164 : 1 - 8
  • [27] Diminished pre-stimulus alpha-lateralization suggests compromised self-initiated attentional control of auditory processing in old age
    Dahl, Martin J.
    Ilg, Liesa
    Li, Shu-Chen
    Passow, Susanne
    Werkle-Bergner, Markus
    NEUROIMAGE, 2019, 197 : 414 - 424
  • [28] Distinguishing the neural mechanism of attentional control and working memory in feature-based attentive tracking
    Wang, Chundi
    Hu, Luming
    Talhelm, Thomas
    Zhang, Xuemin
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 58 (02)
  • [29] Human Aging Compromises Attentional Control of Auditory Perception
    Passow, Susanne
    Westerhausen, Rene
    Wartenburger, Isabell
    Hugdahl, Kenneth
    Heekeren, Hauke R.
    Lindenberger, Ulman
    Li, Shu-Chen
    PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2012, 27 (01) : 99 - 105
  • [30] Contextual Control of Attentional Allocation in Human Discrimination Learning
    Uengoer, Metin
    Lachnit, Harald
    Lotz, Anja
    Koenig, Stephan
    Pearce, John M.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL BEHAVIOR PROCESSES, 2013, 39 (01): : 56 - 66