The performance of the Black Sea Commission as a collaborative governance regime

被引:15
作者
Avoyan, Emma [1 ]
van Tatenhove, Jan [1 ]
Toonen, Hilde [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ & Res, Environm Policy Grp, Hollandseweg 1, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Black Sea; Regional cooperation; Collaborative governance regime; Black Sea Commission; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2017.04.006
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
It is often claimed that the Black Sea is one of the most degraded seas in the world. Management to rehabilitate the Black Sea requires cooperation between the coastal countries to be successful. However, regional cooperation in the Black Sea is poorly coordinated and lack concrete outcomes. This article analyses the performance of the Black Sea Commission in terms of enabling and fostering effective regional collaboration between the Black Sea coastal countries. The results indicate that the measures undertaken by the Black Sea Commission are effective in terms of enabling scientific and project based cooperation between the Black Sea countries. The cooperation around regional and national institutional reforms to tackle the Black Sea environmental problems is found to be weak. Despite the existing mechanisms and willingness of countries to cooperate, the implementation of the established strategic action plan for the environmental protection and rehabilitation of the Black Sea is limited. Most of the limitations of the Black Sea Commission's regime are found in its institutional and legal frameworks, which constrain the effectiveness of collaborative efforts of the Black Sea countries. To be fully functional, the collaborative governance regime of the Black Sea Commission has to be improved. Recommendations as to how these may be addressed to enhance the regime's capacity to ensure effective marine collaborative governance in the region are presented in this article.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 292
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Performance of gridded precipitation products in the Black Sea region for hydrological studies
    Sead Ahmed Swalih
    Ercan Kahya
    Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2022, 149 : 465 - 485
  • [42] Managing distrust in the wider Black Sea region
    Saari, Sinikukka
    SOUTHEAST EUROPEAN AND BLACK SEA STUDIES, 2011, 11 (03) : 215 - 225
  • [43] Using a design approach to create collaborative governance
    Bryson, John M.
    Crosby, Barbara C.
    Seo, Danbi
    POLICY AND POLITICS, 2020, 48 (01): : 167 - 189
  • [44] Drivers and Dynamics of Collaborative Governance in Environmental Management
    Ulibarri, Nicola
    Imperial, Mark T.
    Siddiki, Saba
    Henderson, Hayley
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 71 (3) : 495 - 504
  • [45] Policy learning in collaborative environmental governance processes
    Koebele, Elizabeth A.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING, 2019, 21 (03) : 242 - 256
  • [46] Public Perceptions of Collaborative Governance in Transportation Policy
    Cain, Bruce E.
    Gerber, Elisabeth R.
    Hui, Iris
    POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2021, 74 (04) : 899 - 912
  • [47] Collaborative design of governance instruments in higher education
    Elken, Mari
    STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2024, 49 (06) : 1095 - 1106
  • [48] The Entangled Twins: Power and Trust in Collaborative Governance
    Ran, Bing
    Qi, Huiting
    ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY, 2019, 51 (04) : 607 - 636
  • [49] Exploring Collaborative Governance Processes Involving Nonprofits
    Calo, Francesca
    Teasdale, Simon
    Roy, Michael J.
    Bellazzecca, Enrico
    Mazzei, Micaela
    NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR QUARTERLY, 2024, 53 (01) : 54 - 78
  • [50] DAO as digital governance tool for collaborative housing
    Lustenberger, Michael
    Wollenschlager, Sabrina
    Kung, Lukas
    FRONTIERS IN BLOCKCHAIN, 2025, 8