Impact of genomic testing and patient-reported outcomes on receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy

被引:6
作者
Evans, Chalanda N. [1 ]
Brewer, Noel T. [2 ]
Vadaparampil, Susan T. [3 ]
Boisvert, Marc [4 ]
Ottaviano, Yvonne [5 ]
Lee, M. Catherine [3 ]
Isaacs, Claudine [1 ]
Schwartz, Marc D. [1 ]
O'Neill, Suzanne C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Lombardi Comprehens Canc Ctr, Fisher Ctr Familial Canc Res, Dept Oncol, 3300 Whitehaven St NW,Suite 4100, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Lineberger Comprehens Canc Ctr, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Tampa, FL USA
[4] MedStar Washington Hosp Ctr, Washington, DC USA
[5] Franklin Sq Med Ctr, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
Breast cancer; 21-Gene; Chemotherapy; Treatment decisions; EARLY BREAST-CANCER; RECURRENCE SCORE ASSAY; RT-PCR ASSAY; PATIENTS PREFERENCES; TREATMENT DECISIONS; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; WOMEN; RISK; ONCOLOGIST; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-016-3780-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Practice guidelines incorporate genomic tumor profiling, using results such as the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS), to refine recurrence risk estimates for the large proportion of breast cancer patients with early-stage, estrogen receptor-positive disease. We sought to understand the impact of receiving genomic recurrence risk estimates on breast cancer patients' well-being and the impact of these patient-reported outcomes on receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy. Participants were 193 women (mean age 57) newly diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer. Women were interviewed before and 2-3 weeks after receiving the RS result between 2011 and 2015. We assessed subsequent receipt of chemotherapy from chart review. After receiving their RS, perceived pros (t = 4.27, P < .001) and cons (t = 8.54, P < .001) of chemotherapy increased from pre-test to post-test, while perceived risk of breast cancer recurrence decreased (t = 2.90, P = .004). Women with high RS tumors were more likely to receive chemotherapy than women with low RS tumors (88 vs. 5 %, OR 0.01, 0.00-0.02, P < .001). Higher distress (OR 2.19, 95 % CI 1.05-4.57, P < .05) and lower perceived cons of chemotherapy (OR 0.50, 95 % CI 0.26-0.97, P < .05) also predicted receipt of chemotherapy. Distressed patients who saw few downsides of chemotherapy received this treatment. Clinicians should consider these factors when discussing chemotherapy with breast cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 555
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], BREAST CANC
  • [2] Decision-making impact on adjuvant chemotherapy allocation in early node-negative breast cancer with a 21-gene assay: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Augustovski, Federico
    Soto, Natalie
    Caporale, Joaquin
    Gonzalez, Lucas
    Gibbons, Luz
    Ciapponi, Agustin
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2015, 152 (03) : 611 - 625
  • [3] Patients' perceptions of gene expression profiling in breast cancer treatment decisions
    Bombard, Y.
    Rozmovits, L.
    Trudeau, M. E.
    Leighl, N. B.
    Deal, K.
    Marshall, D. A.
    [J]. CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 (02) : E203 - E211
  • [4] Molecular profiling of breast cancer: clinical implications
    S Cleator
    A Ashworth
    [J]. British Journal of Cancer, 2004, 90 (6) : 1120 - 1124
  • [5] Initial Trends in the Use of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay for Patients With Breast Cancer in the Medicare Population, 2005-2009
    Dinan, Michaela A.
    Mi, Xiaojuan
    Reed, Shelby D.
    Hirsch, Bradford R.
    Lyman, Gary H.
    Curtis, Lesley H.
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2015, 1 (02) : 158 - 166
  • [6] The Value of Personalizing Medicine: Medical Oncologists' Views on Gene Expression Profiling in Breast Cancer Treatment
    Dombard, Yvonne
    Rozmovits, Linda
    Trudeau, Maureen
    Leighl, Natasha B.
    Deal, Ken
    Marshall, Deborah A.
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2015, 20 (04) : 351 - 356
  • [7] Comparing patients' and their partners' preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer
    Duric, Vlatka M.
    Butow, Phyllis N.
    Sharpe, Louise
    Heritier, Stephane
    Boyle, Frances
    Beith, Jane
    Wilcken, Nicholas R. C.
    Coatest, Alan S.
    Simes, R. John
    Stockler, Martin R.
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2008, 72 (02) : 239 - 245
  • [8] Psychosocial factors and patients' preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer
    Duric, Vlatka M.
    Butow, Phyllis N.
    Sharpe, Louise
    Boyle, Frances
    Beith, Jane
    Wilcken, Nicholas R. C.
    Heritier, Stephane
    Coates, Alan S.
    Simes, R. John
    Stockler, Martin R.
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2007, 16 (01) : 48 - 59
  • [9] Patients' preferences for adjuvant endocrine therapy in early breast cancer: what makes it worthwhile?
    Duric, VM
    Fallowfield, LJ
    Saunders, C
    Houghton, J
    Coates, AS
    Stockler, MR
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 93 (12) : 1319 - 1323
  • [10] Patients' preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: what makes AC and CMF worthwhile now?
    Duric, VM
    Stockler, MR
    Heritier, S
    Boyle, F
    Beith, J
    Sullivan, A
    Wilcken, N
    Coates, AS
    Simes, RJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2005, 16 (11) : 1786 - 1794