Life traits of four Botryosphaeriaceae species and molecular responses of different grapevine cultivars or hybrids

被引:40
|
作者
Bellee, A. [1 ]
Comont, G. [1 ]
Nivault, A. [1 ]
Abou-Mansour, E. [2 ]
Coppin, C. [1 ]
Dufour, M. C. [1 ]
Corio-Costet, M. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] INRA, UMR Sante & Agroecol Vignoble 1065, ISVV, Labex Cote, CS20032, F-33883 Villenave Dornon, France
[2] Univ Fribourg, Plant Biol Dept, 3 Rue Albert Gockel, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland
关键词
botryosphaeria dieback; defence gene expression; fungal toxin; grapevine trunk diseases; resistant genotypes; wood necrosis; TRUNK DISEASES; WOODY-PLANTS; DIEBACK; IDENTIFICATION; PATHOGENICITY; DECLINE; EXPRESSION; AUSTRALIA; VINEYARDS; VITICOLA;
D O I
10.1111/ppa.12623
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Botryosphaeriaceae is a fungal family comprising many species involved in botryosphaeria dieback, a worldwide grapevine trunk disease. Currently, the interactions between Botryosphaeriaceae species and various grapevine cultivars are poorly understood and little data is available. This study investigated various life traits of five isolates belonging to four species of Botryosphaeriaceae found in French vineyards (Diplodia mutila, Diplodia seriata, Lasiodiplodia viticola and Neofusicoccum parvum). The two species N. parvum and L. viticola exhibited the highest optimal growth temperature and the best growth rates. They were also responsible for the most extensive necrosis and cankers in three Vitis vinifera cultivars (Cabernet Sauvignon, Merlot and Ugni-Blanc) that differed in susceptibility to botryosphaeria dieback, and in two genotypes resistant to downy and powdery mildew (RV4 and RV5). Identification of the extracellular toxins produced by isolates in culture media showed that the N. parvum isolate had a different metabolite profile from the others, producing terremutin and salicylic acid derivatives, which are known to be compounds associated with virulence. In a second step, life traits were associated with nondestructive monitoring of gene expression involved in the defence mechanisms of five grapevine cultivars and genotypes after inoculation of wood cuttings with Botryosphaeriaceae. The transcript analyses were carried out at different times and were associated with principal component analysis (PCA). Each cultivar presented a specific transcript signature and several transcripts were correlated either with the size of necrosis/cankers or with symptom reduction, thus offering useful markers for breeding or estimating the defence status of plants.
引用
收藏
页码:763 / 776
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The impact of the grapevine trunk disease fungus Lasiodiplodia on the physiological responses of different grapevine cultivars
    Reis, P.
    Pinto, G.
    Cerqueira, A.
    Jesus, C.
    Mota, M.
    Fontaine, F.
    Alves, A.
    Rego, C.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2018, 108 (10)
  • [2] Effects of Bicarbonate and Fe Sources on Vegetative Growth and Physiological Traits of Four Grapevine Cultivars
    Shahsavandi, Fatemeh
    Eshghi, Saeid
    COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2021, 52 (20) : 2401 - 2413
  • [3] Wild grapevine: silvestris, hybrids or cultivars that escaped from vineyards? Molecular evidence in Sardinia
    Zecca, G.
    De Mattia, F.
    Lovicu, G.
    Labra, M.
    Sala, F.
    Grassi, F.
    PLANT BIOLOGY, 2010, 12 (03) : 558 - 562
  • [4] Retrotransposon-based molecular markers for grapevine species and cultivars identification
    D'Onofrio, Claudio
    De Lorenzis, Gabriella
    Giordani, Tommaso
    Natali, Lucia
    Cavallini, Andrea
    Scalabrelli, Giancarlo
    TREE GENETICS & GENOMES, 2010, 6 (03) : 451 - 466
  • [5] Retrotransposon-based molecular markers for grapevine species and cultivars identification
    Claudio D’Onofrio
    Gabriella De Lorenzis
    Tommaso Giordani
    Lucia Natali
    Andrea Cavallini
    Giancarlo Scalabrelli
    Tree Genetics & Genomes, 2010, 6 : 451 - 466
  • [6] DEFOLIATION RESPONSES OF DIFFERENT GRAPEVINE CULTIVARS TO POST-HARVEST ETHEPHON TREATMENTS
    MANNINI, F
    WEAVER, RJ
    JOHNSON, JO
    VITIS, 1983, 22 (02) : 151 - 156
  • [7] Retrotransposon-Based Molecular Markers in Grapevine Species and Cultivars Identification and Phylogenetic Analysis
    D'Onofrio, C.
    De Lorenzis, G.
    Giordani, T.
    Natali, L.
    Scalabrelli, G.
    Cavallini, A.
    IX INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GRAPE GENETICS AND BREEDING, 2009, 827 : 45 - 51
  • [8] Disclosing the Molecular Basis of the Postharvest Life of Berry in Different Grapevine Genotypes
    Zenoni, Sara
    Fasoli, Marianna
    Guzzo, Flavia
    Dal Santo, Silvia
    Amato, Alessandra
    Anesi, Andrea
    Commisso, Mauro
    Herderich, Markus
    Ceoldo, Stefania
    Avesani, Linda
    Pezzotti, Mario
    Tornielli, Giovanni Battista
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 172 (03) : 1821 - 1843
  • [9] Water relations and photosynthetic responses of two grapevine cultivars of different geographical origin during water stress
    Schultz, HR
    FIRST ISHS WORKSHOP ON STRATEGIES TO OPTIMIZE WINE GRAPE QUALITY, 1996, (427): : 251 - 266
  • [10] Evaluating Responses of Four Wetland Plant Species to Different Hydroperiods
    Slusher, C. E.
    Vepraskas, M. J.
    Broome, S. W.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2014, 43 (02) : 723 - 731