Wastewater treatment modelling: dealing with uncertainties

被引:66
作者
Belia, E. [1 ]
Amerlinck, Y. [2 ]
Benedetti, L. [3 ]
Johnson, B. [4 ]
Sin, G. [5 ]
Vanrolleghem, P. A. [6 ]
Gernaey, K. V. [5 ]
Gillot, S. [7 ]
Neumann, M. B. [8 ]
Rieger, L. [6 ]
Shaw, A. [9 ]
Villez, K. [10 ]
机构
[1] Primodal Inc, Quebec City, PQ G1R 2C9, Canada
[2] MOSTforWATER, B-8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
[3] Univ Ghent, BIOMATH, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[4] CH2M Hill Inc, Denver, CO 80112 USA
[5] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Chem & Biochem Engn, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[6] Univ Laval, Dept Genie Civil, ModelEAU, Ste Foy, PQ G1K 7P4, Canada
[7] Cemagref, UR HBAN, F-92163 Antony, France
[8] Eawag, Swiss Fed Inst Aquat Sci & Technol, CH-8600 Dubendorf, Switzerland
[9] Black & Veatch Consulting Engineers, Kansas City, MO 64114 USA
[10] Purdue Univ, LIPS, W Lafayette, IN 47906 USA
关键词
mathematical modelling; prediction accuracy; uncertainty; wastewater; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE MODELS; TREATMENT PLANTS; QUALITY; CALIBRATION; MANAGEMENT; SIMULATION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.2166/wst.2009.225
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper serves as a problem statement of the issues surrounding uncertainty in wastewater treatment modelling. The paper proposes a structure for identifying the sources of uncertainty introduced during each step of an engineering project concerned with model-based design or optimisation of a wastewater treatment system. It briefly references the methods currently used to evaluate prediction accuracy and uncertainty and discusses the relevance of uncertainty evaluations in model applications. The paper aims to raise awareness and initiate a comprehensive discussion among professionals on model prediction accuracy and uncertainty issues. It also aims to identify future research needs. Ultimately the goal of such a discussion would be to generate transparent and objective methods of explicitly evaluating the reliability of model results, before they are implemented in an engineering decision-making context.
引用
收藏
页码:1929 / 1941
页数:13
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] AHNERT M, 2007, P 10 LWWTP C 9 13 SE
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2003, 15839 ISO
  • [3] Belia E., 2008, P 1 IWA WEF WAST TRE
  • [4] Benchmarking of WWTP design by assessing costs, effluent quality and process variability
    Benedetti, L.
    Bixio, D.
    Vanrolleghem, P. A.
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 54 (10) : 95 - 102
  • [5] A quantitative risk analysis tool for design/simulation of wastewater treatment plants
    Bixio, D
    Parmentier, G
    Rousseau, D
    Verdonck, F
    Meirlaen, J
    Vanrolleghem, PA
    Thoeye, C
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 46 (4-5) : 301 - 307
  • [6] Terminology and methodology in modelling for water quality management - A discussion starter
    Carstensen, J
    Vanrolleghem, P
    Rauch, W
    Reichert, P
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 36 (05) : 157 - 168
  • [7] Copp J.B., 2002, The COST simulation benchmark-Description and simulator manual
  • [8] Dochain D., 2001, Dynamic modelling and estimation in wastewater treatment processes
  • [9] Evolution of a wastewater treatment plant challenges traditional design concepts
    Dominguez, D
    Gujer, W
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2006, 40 (07) : 1389 - 1396
  • [10] Activated sludge modelling: past, present and future
    Gujer, W
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 53 (03) : 111 - 119