Methods for mitigating disruptions in complex supply chain structures: a systematic literature review

被引:136
作者
Bier, Tobias [1 ]
Lange, Anne [2 ]
Glock, Christoph H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Darmstadt, Dept Law & Econ, Darmstadt, Germany
[2] Univ Luxembourg, Luxembourg Ctr Logist & Supply Chain Management, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
关键词
supply chain; risk management; supply chain disruption; systematic literature review; network theory; resilience; network structure; SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS; RISK-MANAGEMENT; ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS; DECISION-MAKING; NEXUS SUPPLIER; GRAPH-THEORY; RESILIENCE; PERFORMANCE; UNCERTAINTY; IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2019.1687954
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Supply chain risk management is extremely important for the success of a company. Due to the increasing complexity of supply chains, avoiding and mitigating the effects of disruptions is very challenging. This article presents the results of a systematic literature review and content analysis in order to provide a comprehensive overview of the methods that are currently used for mitigating supply chain disruptions. The results of the review indicate that research in this field is interdisciplinary and that no common modelling language has emerged thus far. Prior research mostly redraws to graph theory and/or social network analysis, although a few methods have been developed recently specifically for supply chain risk management. We observe that prior contributions addressed risk and structure mostly separately and that only a few works focused on their intersection. The results of this review are consolidated in a research agenda that calls for research on the risk-structure-interface and the development of proxy methods.
引用
收藏
页码:1835 / 1856
页数:22
相关论文
共 122 条
[41]   Supply chain network design under uncertainty: A comprehensive review and future research directions [J].
Govindan, Kannan ;
Fattahi, Mohammad ;
Keyvanshokooh, Esmaeil .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2017, 263 (01) :108-141
[42]   Disruptions and supply networks: a multi-level, multi-theoretical relational perspective [J].
Greening, Phil ;
Rutherford, Christine .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2011, 22 (01) :104-126
[43]   Supply risk interrelationships and the derivation of key supply risk indicators [J].
Guertler, Benjamin ;
Spinler, Stefan .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2015, 92 :224-236
[44]   Mixed-indicators model for identifying emerging research areas [J].
Guo, Hanning ;
Weingart, Scott ;
Boerner, Katy .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2011, 89 (01) :421-435
[45]   An integrated approach based-structural modeling for risk prioritization in supply network management [J].
Hachicha, Wafik ;
Elmsalmi, Manel .
JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2014, 17 (10) :1301-1324
[46]   Risk management processes in supplier networks [J].
Hallikas, J ;
Karvonen, I ;
Pulkkinen, U ;
Virolainen, VM ;
Tuominen, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2004, 90 (01) :47-58
[47]   Evaluation mechanism for structural robustness of supply chain considering disruption propagation [J].
Han, Jihee ;
Shin, KwangSup .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2016, 54 (01) :135-151
[48]   Flood risks and impacts: A case study of Thailand's floods in 2011 and research questions for supply chain decision making [J].
Haraguchi, Masahiko ;
Lall, Upmanu .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2015, 14 :256-272
[49]  
Harland C., 2003, J PURCH SUPPLY MANAG, V9, P51, DOI [10.1016/S1478-4092(03)00004-9, DOI 10.1016/S14784092(03)000049]
[50]   A complex network approach to supply chain network theory [J].
Hearnshaw, Edward J. S. ;
Wilson, Mark M. J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2013, 33 (3-4) :442-469