Identifying adverse events in hospitalized patients using global trigger tool in Thailand

被引:0
|
作者
Asavaroengchai, Santawat [1 ]
Sriratanaban, Jiruth [1 ]
Hiransuthikul, Narin [1 ]
Supachutikul, Anuwat [2 ]
机构
[1] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Med, Dept Prevent & Social Med, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[2] Inst Hosp Qual Improvement & Accreditat HA Thaila, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand
关键词
Adverse events; global trigger tool; patient safety goals; CARE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Hospital incidence reporting system has limitation on sensitivity and underreport in detecting the adverse events thus under report them. Trigger tool may provide a more simplified review process for detecting adverse events in a developing country setting. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of the trigger tool on identifying adverse events in Thai hospitalized patients, and to classify the events by the patient safety goals. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional medical record review was conducted to identify adverse events in hospitalized patients at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital during January 2 2008, using the Global Trigger Tool (GTT) by Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Adverse events, severity rating, and preventability were determined by reviewer teams. Types of adverse events were described according to the Patient Safety Goals of Thailand. Results: Five hundred seventy six medical records were reviewed. The total patient-days were 4,460 days. Two hundred thirty six adverse events were detected with a mean rate of 41.0 events per 100 patients or 50.4 events per 1,000 patient-days. One hundred twenty five events (53%) were temporary harm, while 122 (51.7%) were preventable. Regarding the category of adverse event, 75 (31.8%) were related to patient care process, 48 (20.3%) were in safe surgery and 42 (17.8%) were in medication and blood safety. Conclusion: Adverse events using the GTT detected more events than previous reports. Most events had low severity and were preventable. Most events were related to prevention of complications, safe surgery, and medication safety. Assessment of validity is needed before using GTT in medical service.
引用
收藏
页码:545 / 550
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Does Skilled Nursing Facility Trigger Tool used with Global Trigger Tool increase its value for adverse events evaluation?
    Menendez-Fraga, M. D.
    Alonso, J.
    Cimadevilla, B.
    Cueto, B.
    Vazquez, F.
    JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE QUALITY RESEARCH, 2021, 36 (02) : 75 - 80
  • [32] Establishment of a pediatric trigger tool based on Global Trigger Tool to identify adverse drug events of children: experience in a Chinese hospital
    Liu, Yi
    Yan, Junfeng
    Xie, Yunfei
    Bian, Yuan
    BMC PEDIATRICS, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [33] Comparison of traditional trigger tool to data warehouse based screening for identifying hospital adverse events
    O'Leary, Kevin J.
    Devisetty, Vikram K.
    Patel, Amitkumar R.
    Malkenson, David
    Sama, Pradeep
    Thompson, William K.
    Landler, Matthew P.
    Barnard, Cynthia
    Williams, Mark V.
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2013, 22 (02) : 130 - 138
  • [34] The application of Global Trigger Tool in monitoring antineoplastic adverse drug events: a retrospective study
    Liu, Yang
    Liu, Xianjun
    Xia, Binbin
    Chen, Jing
    Sun, Wenfang
    Liu, Fang
    Cheng, Hua
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [35] Characterising the types of paediatric adverse events detected by the global trigger tool - CareTrack Kids
    Hibbert, Peter D.
    Runciman, William B.
    Carson-Stevens, Andrew
    Lachman, Peter
    Wheaton, Gavin
    Hallahan, Andrew R.
    Jaffe, Adam
    White, Les
    Muething, Stephen
    Wiles, Louise K.
    Molloy, Charlotte J.
    Deakin, Anita
    Braithwaite, Jeffrey
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2020, 25 (06): : 239 - 249
  • [36] Adverse Events at Baseline in a Chinese General Hospital: A Pilot Study of the Global Trigger Tool
    Xu, Xiao-Di
    Yuan, Yi-Jie
    Zhao, Li-Ming
    Li, Yang
    Zhang, Hui-Zhen
    Wu, Hua
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY, 2020, 16 (04) : 269 - 273
  • [37] Identifying causes of adverse events detected by an automated trigger tool through in-depth analysis
    Muething, S. E.
    Conway, P. H.
    Kloppenborg, E.
    Lesko, A.
    Schoettker, P. J.
    Seid, M.
    Kotagal, U.
    QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2010, 19 (05): : 435 - 439
  • [38] Evaluation of accuracy of IHI Trigger Tool in identifying adverse drug events: a prospective observational study
    Graciano Silva, Maria das Dores
    Parreiras Martins, Maria Auxiliadora
    Viana, Luciana de Gouvea
    Passaglia, Luiz Guilherme
    de Menezes, Renata Rezende
    de Queiroz Oliveira, Joao Antonio
    Padilha da Silva, Jose Luiz
    Pinho Ribeiro, Antonio Luiz
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 84 (10) : 2252 - 2259
  • [39] Timing of adverse events in patients undergoing acute and elective hip arthroplasty surgery: a multicentre cohort study using the Global Trigger Tool
    Magneli, Martin
    Kelly-Pettersson, Paula
    Rogmark, Cecilia
    Gordon, Max
    Skoldenberg, Olof
    Unbeck, Maria
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (06):
  • [40] Assessment of adverse events in medical care: lack of consistency between experienced teams using the global trigger tool
    Schildmeijer, Kristina
    Nilsson, Lena
    Arestedt, Kristofer
    Perk, Joep
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2012, 21 (04) : 307 - 314