Technological innovation efficiency and its impact factors: An investigation of China?s listed energy companies

被引:0
作者
Piao, Zhefan [1 ,2 ]
Miao, Binbin [3 ]
Zheng, Zihan [1 ]
Xu, Feng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Finance, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ Finance & Econ, Financial Innovat & Inclus Finance Res Ctr, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Econ, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Technological innovation efficiency; Energy companies; Patent classification; SFA model; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; PRODUCTIVITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study empirically examines the technological innovation efficiency (TIE) and its influencing factors using a multiple input-output stochastic frontier analysis model and a fixed-effect model on a sample of China's listed energy companies between 2008 and 2017. The results revealed the following. (1) The number of patents and research and development investments of China's listed energy companies increased rapidly. However, the overall TIE level of these energy companies was far lower than that of the effective state and showed a downward trend. (2) For the enterprise classification samples, the TIE of state-owned and foreign energy enterprises was lower than that of private energy enterprises, and the TIE of new energy enterprises was higher than that of traditional energy enterprises. (3) For the patent classification samples (IPC1, IPC2, and IPC3), only an increase in IPC2 (the number of patents in fixed buildings, mechanical engineering, heating, weapons, and blasting fields) helped increase the TIE of energy enterprises. (4) Government subsidy and financial leverage are positive factors, while financing constraints, market uncertainty and asset size are negative factors for increasing the TIE of energy enterprises.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] EFFICIENCY OF COMMERCIAL BANKS IN PAKISTAN: APPLICATION OF SFA AND VALUE ADDED APPROACH
    Afza, Talat
    Asghar, Muhammad Jam-e-Kausar Ali
    [J]. ARGUMENTA OECONOMICA, 2017, 38 (01): : 195 - 220
  • [2] Risk-based analysis and policy implications for renewable energy investments in Greece
    Angelopoulos, Dimitrios
    Doukas, Harts
    Psarras, John
    Stamtsis, Giorgos
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 105 : 512 - 523
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, OXFORD HDB INNOVATIO
  • [4] Battese G.E., 1995, EMPIR ECON, V20, P325, DOI [10.1007/bf01205442, DOI 10.1007/BF01205442]
  • [5] Stochastic frontier analysis using Stata
    Belotti, Federico
    Daidone, Silvio
    Ilardi, Giuseppe
    Ate, Vincenzo
    [J]. STATA JOURNAL, 2013, 13 (04) : 719 - 758
  • [6] Foreign capital, credit constraints and continuity of firms' R&D
    Beneito, P.
    Rochina-Barrachina, M. E.
    Sanchis, A.
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2016, 23 (03) : 157 - 161
  • [7] China's R&D explosion-Analyzing productivity effects across ownership types and over time
    Boeing, Philipp
    Mueller, Elisabeth
    Sandner, Philipp
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (01) : 159 - 176
  • [8] [陈修德 Chen Xiude], 2010, [科学学研究, Studies in Science of Science], V28, P1198
  • [9] Delay and secrecy: does industry sponsorship jeopardize disclosure of academic research?
    Czarnitzki, Dirk
    Grimpe, Christoph
    Toole, Andrew A.
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2015, 24 (01) : 251 - 279
  • [10] Patent statistics: A good indicator for innovation in China? Patent subsidy program impacts on patent quality
    Dang, Jianwei
    Motohashi, Kanyuki
    [J]. CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2015, 35 : 137 - 155