Effect of early activation of cochlear implant on electrode impedance in pediatric population

被引:15
|
作者
Alhabib, Salman F. [1 ]
Abdelsamad, Yassin [2 ]
Yousef, Medhat [1 ,3 ]
Alzhrani, Farid [1 ]
Hagr, Abdulrahman [1 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Coll Med, King Abdullah Ear Specialist Ctr KAESC, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[2] MED El GmbH, Res Dept, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[3] Menoufia Univ Hosp, Fac Med, Audiol Unit, Menoufia, Egypt
关键词
One-day activation; Electrode impedance; Fibrosis; Minimal invasive cochlear implantation technique; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110543
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: To assess the evolution of electrode impedance after the early fitting of audio processors (activation after one-day) and classical fitting (activation after one-month) over an up-to-one year after cochlear implant (CI) surgery. Methods: A retrospective cohort study on Fifty-two CI recipients divided into two groups. The study group included 24 recipients (40 ears) who underwent early fitting, whereas the control group contained 28 recipients (40 ears) who underwent classical fitting. The electrode impedance was recorded during the surgery, switch-on session and at one, three, six, and twelve-months after the surgery. Results: In the study group, electrode impedance values obtained intraoperatively and at switch-on and one, three, six, and twelve-months were 4.89, 3.69, 6.52, 6.24, 6.05, and 5.81 K Omega, respectively, and only the switch-on and one-month values were significantly different (p < 0.0001). In the control group, electrode impedance values obtained intraoperatively and at switch-on and one, three, six, and twelve-months were 4.71, 7.19, 6.40, 6.05, and 5.73 K Omega, respectively. Thus, the electrode impedance value at switch-on was 52.65% (p < 0.001) greater than it intraoperatively. For both groups, the electrode impedance value at twelve-months was significantly higher than the respective intraoperative values (study group: 18.6% higher, P = 0.04; control group: 21.65% higher, P = 0.0001). Conclusion: Electrode impedance was significantly lower in the study group compared to the control group until one month after the surgery. However, the electrode impedance at twelve-months after the CI was similar in both groups.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Long-Term Impedance Trend in Cochlear Implant Users with Genetically Determined Congenital Profound Hearing Loss
    Brotto, Davide
    Caserta, Ezio
    Sorrentino, Flavia
    Favaretto, Niccolo
    Marioni, Gino
    Martini, Alessandro
    Bovo, Roberto
    Gheller, Flavia
    Trevisi, Patrizia
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (02) : 105 - 113
  • [42] Effect of Electrode Impedance on the Transient Response of ECG Recording Amplifiers
    Maji, Soumyajyoti
    Burke, Martin J.
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MEDICAL MEASUREMENTS AND APPLICATIONS (MEMEA), 2018, : 249 - 254
  • [43] Age and Incidence of Cochlear Implantation in the Pediatric Population With Congenital Bilateral Profound Hearing Loss
    Nassiri, Ashley M. M.
    Marinelli, John P. P.
    Lohse, Christine M. M.
    Carlson, Matthew L. L.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2023, 44 (07) : E492 - E496
  • [44] Magnetically Steered Robotic Insertion of Cochlear-Implant Electrode Arrays: System Integration and First-In-Cadaver Results
    Bruns, Trevor L.
    Riojas, Katherine E.
    Ropella, Dominick S.
    Cavilla, Matt S.
    Petruska, Andrew J.
    Freeman, Michael H.
    Labadie, Robert F.
    Abbott, Jake J.
    Webster, Robert J., III
    IEEE ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION LETTERS, 2020, 5 (02) : 2240 - 2247
  • [45] Four-point Impedance Changes in the Early Post-Operative Period After Cochlear Implantation
    Razmovski, Tayla
    Bester, Christofer
    Collins, Aaron
    O'Leary, Stephen J.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2022, 43 (07) : E730 - E737
  • [46] Self-Assessment of Cochlear Health by New Cochlear Implant Recipients: Daily Impedance, Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential and Electrocochleography Measurements Over the First Three Postoperative Months
    Mushtaq, Faizah
    Soulby, Andrew
    Boyle, Patrick
    Papoutselou, Efstratia
    Nunn, Terry
    Hartley, Douglas E. H.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2024, 45 (07) : e517 - e524
  • [47] The Relationship Between the Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Threshold and Stimulus Burst Duration in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Users: Preliminary Data
    Walkowiak, Adam
    Kontides, Alejandra
    Takanen, Marko
    Obrycka, Anita
    Skarzynski, Piotr
    Skarzynski, Henryk
    Lorens, Artur
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2025, 46 (01) : e21 - e27
  • [48] Effect of Chloral Hydrate Sedation on Intraocular Pressure in a Pediatric Population
    Varadaraj, Varshini
    Munoz, Beatriz
    Karaoui, Mohammed
    Collins, Megan E.
    Aljasim, Leyla Ali
    Al Naj, Essam
    Hamweyah, Karam
    Al Shamrani, Mohammed
    Craven, Earl Randy
    Friedman, David S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 194 : 126 - 133
  • [49] Influence of Postponed Follow-Up after Cochlear Implant Activation during the COVID-19 Pandemic on Aided Sound Field Detection and Speech Recognition
    Vos, Teresa G.
    Brown, Kevin D.
    Buss, Emily
    Bucker, Andrea L.
    Dedmon, Matthew M.
    O'Connell, Brendan P.
    Raymond, Jenna
    Dillon, Margaret T.
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEUROTOLOGY, 2022, 27 (03) : 227 - 234
  • [50] Prevalence of Surgical, Anesthetic, and Device-related Complications Among Infants Implanted Before 9 and 12 Months of Age Versus Older Children: Evidence for the Continued Expansion of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Candidacy Criteria
    Chweya, Cynthia M.
    Smith, Alyssa J.
    May, Matthew M.
    Lohse, Christine M.
    Neff, Brian A.
    Driscoll, Colin L. W.
    Carlson, Matthew L.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2021, 42 (06) : E666 - E674