Automatic Vehicle Detection With Roadside LiDAR Data Under Rainy and Snowy Conditions

被引:45
作者
Wu, Jianqing [1 ]
Xu, Hao [1 ]
Zheng, Jianying [2 ]
Zhao, Junxuan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nevada, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Reno, NV 89557 USA
[2] Soochow Univ, Sch Urban Rail Transportat, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Civil Environm & Construct Engn, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
关键词
This research was funded by the SOLARIS Institute; a Tier 1 University Transportation Center (UTC) under Grant No. DTRT13-G-UTC55 and matching funds by the Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) under Grant No. P224-14-803/TO #13. The authors gratefully acknowledge this financial support. This research was also supported by engineers with the Nevada Department of Transportation; the Regional Transportation Commission of Washoe County; Nevada; and the City of Reno;
D O I
10.1109/MITS.2019.2926362
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The previous studies showed that rainy and snowy weather can reduce the quality of LiDAR data. In rainy and snowy weather, laser beams of LiDAR were often blocked by raindrops or snowflakes, which was called weather occlusion. The vehicle detection with weather occlusion is a challenge. When the traditional density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN) was used for vehicle clustering, the data processing showed that the false detection rate of the conventional DBSCAN under the snowy weather was high. This paper aims to present the characteristics of roadside LiDAR data in snowy and rainy days and improve the accuracy of vehicle detection during challenging weather conditions. A revised DBSCAN method named 3D-SDBSCAN is raised up to distinguish vehicle points and snowflakes in the LiDAR data. Adaptive parameters were applied in the revised DBSCAN method to detect vehicles with different distances from the roadside LiDAR sensor. The performance of the proposed method and the conventional DBSCAN algorithm were compared using the data collected under rainy and snowy conditions. The results showed that the 3D-SDBSCAN algorithm could overcome weather occlusion issue better than the conventional one.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 209
页数:13
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Unsupervised robust planar segmentation of terrestrial laser scanner point clouds based on fuzzy clustering methods [J].
Blosca, Josep Miquel ;
Lerma, Jose Luis .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2008, 63 (01) :84-98
[2]  
Ester M., 1996, KDD-96 Proceedings. Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, P226
[3]   Discrete Return Lidar in Natural Resources: Recommendations for Project Planning, Data Processing, and Deliverables [J].
Evans, Jeffrey S. ;
Hudak, Andrew T. ;
Faux, Russ ;
Smith, Alistair M. S. .
REMOTE SENSING, 2009, 1 (04) :776-794
[4]  
Hartigan J. A., 1979, Applied Statistics, V28, P100, DOI 10.2307/2346830
[5]  
Hasirlioglu S., 2017, 2017 IEEE 20 INT C I, P1, DOI DOI 10.1109/ITSC.2017.8317823
[6]  
Hasirlioglu S, 2016, 2016 IEEE 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITSC), P2242, DOI 10.1109/ITSC.2016.7795918
[7]  
Hasirlioglu S, 2016, IEEE INT VEH SYM, P286, DOI 10.1109/IVS.2016.7535399
[8]  
Hastie T., 2008, The Elements of Statistical Learning, V2, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-21606-514
[9]   Fuzzy extensions of the DBScan clustering algorithm [J].
Ienco, Dino ;
Bordogna, Gloria .
SOFT COMPUTING, 2018, 22 (05) :1719-1730
[10]   An efficient k-means clustering algorithm:: Analysis and implementation [J].
Kanungo, T ;
Mount, DM ;
Netanyahu, NS ;
Piatko, CD ;
Silverman, R ;
Wu, AY .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2002, 24 (07) :881-892