The Impact of Regulation on Auditor Fees: Evidence from the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

被引:136
作者
Ghosh, Aloke [1 ]
Pawlewicz, Robert [1 ]
机构
[1] CUNY Bernard M Baruch Coll, New York, NY 10010 USA
来源
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY | 2009年 / 28卷 / 02期
关键词
Sarbanes-Oxley Act; audit pricing; auditor fees; Big; 4; premium; fee discounting; lowballing; NONAUDIT SERVICES; LITIGATION RISK; ENGAGEMENTS;
D O I
10.2308/aud.2009.28.2.171
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We examine changes in auditor fees around the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX). Audit fees are expected to increase after SOX due to an increase in both audit effort and auditors' expected legal liability. Our results indicate an economically large increase in audit fees following the enactment of SOX. Controlling for audit and client characteristics, we find that audit fee levels rose approximately 74 percent in the post-SOX period. Nonaudit fees fell significantly over the same period, but total fees paid to auditors rose because the increase in audit fees more than offset the decline in nonaudit fees. Additionally, we find that the Big 4 audit firms increased audit fees by 42 percent more than their smaller counterparts. Finally, we find that while small and large audit firms discount fees on initial engagements to attract new clients in the pre-SOX period, only small audit firms continue to offer fee discounts for the post-SOX years. Our findings are robust to a host of sensitivity tests.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 197
页数:27
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Do nonaudit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence [J].
Ashbaugh, H ;
LaFond, R ;
Mayhew, BW .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2003, 78 (03) :611-639
[2]  
Asthana S., 2004, EFFECT ENRON ANDERSE
[3]   Auditors' perceived business risk and audit fees: Analysis and evidence [J].
Bell, TB ;
Landsman, WR ;
Shackelford, DA .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2001, 39 (01) :35-43
[4]  
BURNS J, 2007, SECS TOP ACCOUNTANT
[5]  
CHAN D, 1999, CONTEMP ACCOUNT RES, V16, P51
[6]   Self-selection of auditors and audit pricing in private firms [J].
Chaney, PK ;
Jeter, DC ;
Shivakumar, L .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2004, 79 (01) :51-72
[7]   Audit pricing, legal liability regimes, and Big 4 premiums: Theory and cross-country evidence [J].
Choi, Jong-Hag ;
Kim, Jeong-Bon ;
Liu, Xiaohong ;
Simunic, Dan A. .
CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2008, 25 (01) :55-+
[8]  
Ciesielski J.T., 2006, The CPA Journal, V76, P28
[9]   Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations [J].
Craswell, AT ;
Francis, JR ;
Taylor, SL .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1995, 20 (03) :297-322
[10]   Pricing initial audit engagements: A test of competing theories [J].
Craswell, AT ;
Francis, JR .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 1999, 74 (02) :201-216