Change in Crown-to-Implant Ratio of Implants Placed in Grafted and Nongrafted Posterior Maxillary Sites: A 5-year Prospective Randomized Study

被引:11
作者
Nedir, Rabah [1 ]
Nurdin, Nathalie [1 ]
Huynh-Ba, Guy [2 ]
Bischof, Mark [3 ]
机构
[1] Ardentis Clin Dent Vevey, Swiss Dent Clin Grp, Rue Coll 3, CH-1800 Vevey, Switzerland
[2] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Dept Periodont, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[3] Ardentis Clin Dent Lausanne, Swiss Dent Clin Grp, Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
atrophic posterior maxilla; crown-to-implant ratio; dental implants; grafting material; osteotome sinus floor elevation; proximal bone-to-implant contact; SINUS FLOOR ELEVATION; DENTAL IMPLANTS; BONE LEVELS; RESTORATIONS;
D O I
10.11607/jomi.6766
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of implants placed for 5 years in grafted vs nongrafted sinuses in relation to crown-to-implant ratio. The measurements of crown and implant lengths took into account changes in both endo-sinus and crestal bone levels over 5 years. Materials and Methods: Enrolled patients required one or two implants in at least one sinus and presented a residual bone height of posterior maxilla 5 4 mm. Individual sinuses were randomly allocated either to be grafted or not before surgery. Implants of 8 mm in length were placed using osteotome sinus floor elevation (OSFE). After 10 weeks of healing, they were loaded functionally using definitive single crowns. Radiographic measurements were made on periapical radiographs taken at surgery, prosthetic steps, and 5 years. The implant length was measured between the most apical and coronal contact of bone and implant, and the crown length was measured between the most occlusal point of the crown and the crestal bone. Data were analyzed using mixed linear models. Results: Twenty implants were placed in grafted sinuses and 17 in native bone (12 patients). One of the 35 restored implants failed. Immediately after surgery, the mean lengths of the implants placed in grafted and nongrafted sites were 2.4 +/- 0.8 and 2.7 +/- 0.9 mm, respectively (P = .351). At loading, the mean crown-to-implant ratios were 3.8 +/- 0.8 and 4.6 +/- 2.0 (P = .033), respectively, whereas at 5 years, they were 2.0 +/- 0.8 and 2.1 +/- 0.4, respectively (P = .341). Conclusion: The use of grafting material is not necessary to restore posterior maxilla <= 4 mm with OSFE and simultaneous implant placement. Over 5 years, all restored implants but one were functional. Despite unfavorable conditions in terms of initial bone anchorage and height of single crown restoration, a high initial crown-to-implant ratio did not compromise the long-term survival of implants placed in grafted or nongrafted sinuses.
引用
收藏
页码:1227 / 1232
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Retrospective Study of Short and Extra-Short Implants Placed in Posterior Regions: Influence of Crown-to-Implant Ratio on Marginal Bone Loss [J].
Anitua, Eduardo ;
Pinas, Laura ;
Orive, Gorka .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2015, 17 (01) :102-110
[2]   Short Dental Implants: A Systematic Review [J].
Annibali, S. ;
Cristalli, M. P. ;
Dell'Aquila, D. ;
Bignozzi, I. ;
La Monaca, G. ;
Pilloni, A. .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2012, 91 (01) :25-32
[3]  
Ante I H., 1926, Mich State Dent Soc Bull, V8, P14
[4]  
Behat O, 2000, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V15, P646
[5]   Crown-to-Implant Ratios of Short-Length Implants [J].
Birdi, Hardeep ;
Schulte, John ;
Kovacs, Alejandro ;
Weed, Meghan ;
Chuang, Sung-Kiang .
JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2010, 36 (06) :425-433
[6]   A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. II: Influence of the crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic treatment modalities on crestal bone loss [J].
Blanes, Rafael Juan ;
Bernard, Jean Pierre ;
Blanes, Zulema Maria ;
Belser, Urs Christoph .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2007, 18 (06) :707-714
[7]  
Dykema RW, 1962, J TENN DENT ASS, V42, P309
[8]   Implant therapy in periodontally compromised patients [J].
Ellegaard, B ;
Baelum, V ;
Karring, T .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1997, 8 (03) :180-188
[9]  
Jensen SS, 2012, ITI TREATMENT GUIDE, V5, P11
[10]   To what extent does the crown-implant ratio affect the survival and complications of implant-supported reconstructions? A systematic review [J].
Juan Blanes, Rafael .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 :67-72