Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Breast MRI as a Prognostic Surrogate: Correlation With Breast Cancer Oncotype Dx Score

被引:12
|
作者
Zhang, Michelle [1 ,2 ]
Sadinski, Meredith [1 ]
Haddad, Dana [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Bae, Min Sun [1 ,6 ]
Martinez, Danny [1 ]
Morris, Elizabeth A. [1 ]
Gibbs, Peter [1 ]
Sutton, Elizabeth J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Radiol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Montefiore, Dept Radiol, New York, NY USA
[4] Mediclin Middle East, Dept Radiol, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
[5] Mohammed Bin Rashid Univ Med & Hlth Sci, Coll Med, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
[6] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2021年 / 10卷
关键词
breast cancer; magnetic resonance imaging; oncotype; risk score; background parenchymal enhancement;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2020.595820
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Breast MRI background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) can potentially serve as a prognostic marker, by possible correlation with molecular subtype. Oncotype Dx, a gene assay, is a prognostic and predictive surrogate for tumor aggressiveness and treatment response. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between contralateral non-tumor breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) background parenchymal enhancement and tumor oncotype score. Methods In this retrospective study, patients with ER+ and HER2- early stage invasive ductal carcinoma who underwent preoperative breast MRI, oncotype risk scoring, and breast conservation surgery from 2008-2010 were identified. After registration, BPE from the pre and three post-contrast phases was automatically extracted using a k-means clustering algorithm. Four metrics were calculated: initial enhancement (IE) relative to the pre-contrast signal, late enhancement, overall enhancement (OE), and area under the enhancement curve (AUC). Histogram analysis was performed to determine first order metrics which were compared to oncotype risk score groups using Mann-Whitney tests and Spearman rank correlation analysis. Results This study included 80 women (mean age = 51.1 +/- 10.3 years); 46 women were categorized as low risk (<= 17) and 34 women were categorized as intermediate/high risk (>= 18) according to Oncotype Dx. For the mean of the top 10% pixels, significant differences were noted for IE (p = 0.032), OE (p = 0.049), and AUC (p = 0.044). Using the risk score as a continuous variable, correlation analysis revealed a weak but significant correlation with the mean of the top 10% pixels for IE (r = 0.26, p = 0.02), OE (r = 0.25, p = 0.02), and AUC (r = 0.27, p = 0.02). Conclusion BPE metrics of enhancement in the non-tumor breast are associated with tumor Oncotype Dx recurrence score, suggesting that the breast microenvironment may relate to likelihood of recurrence and magnitude of chemotherapy benefit.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] MRI background parenchymal enhancement, fibroglandular tissue, and mammographic breast density in patients with invasive lobular breast cancer on adjuvant endocrine hormonal treatment: associations with survival
    Roberto Lo Gullo
    Isaac Daimiel
    Carolina Rossi Saccarelli
    Almir Bitencourt
    Varadan Sevilimedu
    Danny F. Martinez
    Maxine S. Jochelson
    Elizabeth A. Morris
    Jeffrey S. Reiner
    Katja Pinker
    Breast Cancer Research, 22
  • [42] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® Test in Node-Negative Early Breast Cancer
    Berdunov, Vladislav
    Millen, Steve
    Paramore, Andrew
    Griffin, Jane
    Reynia, Sarah
    Fryer, Nina
    Brown, Rebecca
    Longworth, Louise
    CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2022, 14 : 619 - 633
  • [43] Cost-effectiveness analysis of the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score test in node-positive early breast cancer
    Berdunov, Vladislav
    Millen, Steve
    Paramore, Andrew
    Hall, Peter
    Perren, Timothy
    Brown, Rebecca
    Griffin, Jane
    Reynia, Sarah
    Fryer, Nina
    Longworth, Louise
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 25 (01) : 591 - 604
  • [44] Does oncotype DX recurrence score affect the management of patients with early-stage breast cancer?
    Asad, Juhi
    Jacobson, Allyson F.
    Estabrook, Alison
    Smith, Sharon Rosenbaum
    Boolbol, Susan K.
    Feldman, Sheldon M.
    Osborne, Michael P.
    Boachie-Adjei, Kwadwo
    Twardzik, Wendy
    Tartter, Paul I.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 196 (04): : 527 - 529
  • [45] Effect of background parenchymal enhancement on breast cancer detection with magnetic resonance imaging
    Telegrafo, M.
    Rella, L.
    Ianora, A. A. Stabile
    Angelelli, G.
    Moschetta, M.
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2016, 97 (03) : 313 - 318
  • [46] Machine Learning Assessment of Background Parenchymal Enhancement in Breast Cancer and Clinical Applications: A Literature Review
    Duong, Katie S.
    Rubner, Rhianna
    Siegel, Adam
    Adam, Richard
    Ha, Richard
    Maldjian, Takouhie
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (21)
  • [47] Impact of Radiotherapy on Background Parenchymal Enhancement in Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Kim, Yun Ju
    Kim, Sung Hun
    Choi, Byung Gil
    Kang, Bong Joo
    Kim, Hyeon Sook
    Cha, Eun Suk
    Song, Byung Joo
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2014, 15 (07) : 2939 - 2943
  • [48] Correlation Between Mammographic Breast Density, Breast Tissue Type in Ultrasonography, Fibroglandular Tissue, and Background Parenchymal Enhancement in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Alikhassi, Afsaneh
    Yazdi, Seyedeh Nooshin Miratashi
    Akbari, Hedieh
    Kia, Sona Akbari
    Baikpour, Masoud
    BREAST CANCER-BASIC AND CLINICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 12
  • [49] Does the degree of background enhancement in breast MRI affect the detection and staging of breast cancer?
    Takayoshi Uematsu
    Masako Kasami
    Junichiro Watanabe
    European Radiology, 2011, 21 : 2261 - 2267
  • [50] Does the degree of background enhancement in breast MRI affect the detection and staging of breast cancer?
    Uematsu, Takayoshi
    Kasami, Masako
    Watanabe, Junichiro
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (11) : 2261 - 2267