HER2 FISH classification of equivocal HER2 IHC breast cancers with use of the 2013 ASCO/CAP practice guideline

被引:32
作者
Fan, Yao-Shan [1 ,2 ]
Casas, Carmen E. [1 ,2 ]
Peng, Jinghong [1 ,2 ]
Watkins, Melanie [1 ,2 ]
Fan, Lynn [1 ,2 ]
Chapman, Jennifer [1 ,2 ]
Ikpatt, Offiong Francis [1 ,2 ]
Gomez, Carmen [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Wei [4 ]
Reis, Isildinha M. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Pathol, 1601 NW 12th Ave,Rm 7050, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[2] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Lab Med, 1601 NW 12th Ave,Rm 7050, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[3] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[4] Univ Miami, Biostat & Bioinformat Core Shared Resource Sylves, Sch Med, Miami, FL USA
关键词
Breast cancer; HER2; Immunohistochemistry; Fluorescence in situ hybridization; ASCO/CAP practice guideline; Polysomy; 17; IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION; AMERICAN-SOCIETY; CLINICAL ONCOLOGY/COLLEGE; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; TRASTUZUMAB; RECEPTOR; THERAPY; RECOMMENDATIONS; CONCORDANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-016-3717-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The status of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2, ERBB2) determines the eligibility of breast cancer patients to receive HER2-targeted therapy. The majority of HER2 testing in the U.S. is performed using a combination of immunohistochemistry (IHC) screening followed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for IHC equivocal cases. In 2013, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) updated the guideline for HER2 testing. This study evaluates the impact of the 2013 ASCO/CAP updated guideline on final HER2 FISH classification of breast cancers with an equivocal IHC result. For each case, we reported a FISH result according to the 2013 updated guideline and recorded a separated result using the 2007 guideline for investigational purpose. McNemar's test and Bowker's symmetry test were used to compare the classifications by the two guidelines. Among 172 HER2 IHC 2+ equivocal cases, use of the 2103 guideline changed classifications in 36 cases (21 %) when compared with the results expected by use of the 2007 guideline, and yielded a higher proportion of positive (28.5 vs. 23.3 %) and equivocal (16.3 vs. 4.1 %), and a lower proportion of negative (55.2 vs. 72.7 %) cases (p < 0.001). The major classification change with use of the updated guideline is from the HER2 FISH negative to equivocal in 26 cases (15 %). Our study has shown that implementation of the 2013 ASCO/CAP updated guideline has significant impact on HER2 classification for breast cancers with an equivocal HER2 IHC result and therefore increased the use of HER2-targeted therapy. Our data have also shown that reflex FISH is effective for final classification of the IHC equivocal cases and that polysomy 17 (CEP17 copy number a parts per thousand yen3/cell) is present in a significantly higher proportion of cases with an equivocal HER2 FISH classification.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 462
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Effects of the Change in Cutoff Values for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Status by Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization A Study Comparing Conventional Brightfield Microscopy, Image Analysis-Assisted Microscopy, and Interobserver Variation [J].
Atkinson, Roscoe ;
Mollerup, Jens ;
Laenkholm, Anne-Vibeke ;
Verardo, Mark ;
Hawes, Debra ;
Commins, Deborah ;
Engvad, Birte ;
Correa, Adrian ;
Ehlers, Charlotte Cort ;
Nielsen, Kirsten Vang .
ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2011, 135 (08) :1010-1016
[2]   Testing for HER2-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis [J].
Dendukuri, Nandini ;
Khetani, Karim ;
McIsaac, Michelle ;
Brophy, James .
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2007, 176 (10) :1429-1434
[3]   HER2-amplified breast cancer: mechanisms of trastuzumab resistance and novel targeted therapies [J].
Gajria, Devika ;
Chandarlapaty, Sarat .
EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2011, 11 (02) :263-275
[4]   Institutional quality assurance for breast cancer HER2 immunohistochemicat testing: identification of outlier results and impact of simultaneous fluorescence in situ hybridization cotesting [J].
Green, Ian F. ;
Zynger, Debra L. .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2015, 46 (12) :1842-1849
[5]   HER2 in situ hybridization in breast cancer: clinical implications of polysomy 17 and genetic heterogeneity [J].
Hanna, Wedad M. ;
Rueschoff, Josef ;
Bilous, Michael ;
Coudry, Renata A. ;
Dowsett, Mitch ;
Osamura, Robert Y. ;
Penault-Llorca, Frederique ;
van de Vijver, Marc ;
Viale, Giuseppe .
MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2014, 27 (01) :4-18
[6]  
Hicks DG, 2008, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V132, P1008, DOI 10.1043/1543-2165(2008)132[1008:TAATFE]2.0.CO
[7]  
2
[8]   Assessment of HER2 status in invasive breast cancers with increased centromere 17 copy number [J].
Jang, Min Hye ;
Kim, Eun Joo ;
Kim, Hyun Jeong ;
Chung, Yul Ri ;
Park, So Yeon .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2015, 153 (01) :67-77
[9]   Adjuvant docetaxel or vinorelbine with or without trastuzumab for breast cancer [J].
Joensuu, H ;
Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, P ;
Bono, P ;
Alanko, T ;
Kataja, V ;
Asola, R ;
Utriainen, T ;
Kokko, R ;
Hemminki, A ;
Tarkkanen, M ;
Turpeenniemi-Hujanen, T ;
Jyrkkiö, S ;
Flander, M ;
Helle, L ;
Ingalsuo, S ;
Johansson, K ;
Jääskeläinen, A ;
Pajunen, M ;
Rauhala, M ;
Kaleva-Kerola, J ;
Salminen, T ;
Leinonen, M ;
Elomaa, I ;
Isola, J .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (08) :809-820
[10]   HER-2 testing in breast cancer using immunohistochemical analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization - A single-institution experience of 2,279 cases and comparison of dual-color and single-color scoring [J].
Lal, P ;
Salazar, PA ;
Hudis, CA ;
Ladanyi, M ;
Chen, BY .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2004, 121 (05) :631-636