Transplant renal artery stenosis: Evaluation with contrast-enhanced ultrasound

被引:32
作者
Pan, Fu-shun [1 ]
Liu, Ming [1 ]
Luo, Jia [1 ]
Tian, Wen-shuo [1 ]
Liang, Jin-yu [1 ]
Xu, Ming [1 ]
Zheng, Yan-ling [1 ]
Xie, Xiao-yan [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Ultrasound, Dept Med Ultrason, 58 Zhongshan Rd 2, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Kidney transplantation; Ultrasonography; Doppler; Renal artery stenosis; Computed tomography angiography; DUPLEX-DOPPLER SONOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSIS; INDEX; US;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.02.031
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in depicting transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS). Materials and methods: Seventy-eight patients (56 men and 22 women; aged 36 I 12.2 years) who were suspected of TRAS due to either Doppler ultrasound (DUS) abnormalities or difficult control of blood pressure and/or persistent deterioration of renal function were enrolled to perform CEUS. The reference standard for the TRAS diagnoses was computed tomography angiography (CTA). The diagnostic performance of DUS and CEUS parameters was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: TRAS was diagnosed in 32 out of 78 cases by CTA. The AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of CEUS in predicting TRAS were 0.92, 92.3%, 87.5%, 95.7%, 93.3%, and 91.7%, respectively. CEUS rectified 13 (28.3%) false-positive cases on DUS, which were confirmed by CTA. Compared to DUS parameters, CEUS showed the highest AUC, statistically significant differences of AUC were found (P=0.006-0.039), except for that of the PSV ratio in the main transplant renal artery to that in interlobar artery (PSV-ratio) (AUC: 0.92 versus 0.86, P=0.422). However, CEUS showed a significantly higher specificity (95.7% versus 76.1%, P= 0.008) and the same sensitivity compared to PSV-ratio. Conclusions: CEUS is superior to DUS in depicting TRAS. Moreover, our results suggest that CEUS might potentially be used as a noninvasive tool to spare many patients from unnecessary CTA. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 49
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
AbuRahma A. F., 1993, ANN VASC SURG, V7
[2]  
BAXTER GM, 1995, CLIN RADIOL, V50, P618, DOI 10.1016/S0009-9260(05)83291-X
[3]   Spontaneous regression of initially elevated peak systolic velocity in renal transplant artery [J].
Brabrand, Knut ;
Holdaas, Hallvard ;
Gunther, Anne ;
Midtvedt, Karsten .
TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 24 (06) :555-559
[4]   Imaging of the renal transplant: comparison of MRI with duplex sonography [J].
Browne, R. F. J. ;
Tuite, D. J. .
ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2006, 31 (04) :461-482
[5]  
Buturovic-Ponikvar Jadranka, 2003, Nephrol Dial Transplant, V18 Suppl 5, pv74
[6]   Duplex Doppler sonography of transplant renal artery stenosis [J].
De Morais, RH ;
Muglia, VF ;
Mamere, AE ;
Pisi, TG ;
Saber, LT ;
Muglia, VA ;
Elias, J ;
Piccinato, CE ;
Trad, CS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 2003, 31 (03) :135-141
[7]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845
[8]   POSTTRANSPLANT RENAL-ARTERY STENOSIS - OUTPATIENT INTRAARTERIAL DSA VERSUS COLOR AIDED DUPLEX DOPPLER SONOGRAPHY [J].
DUDA, SH ;
ERLEY, CM ;
WAKAT, JP ;
HUPPERT, PE ;
LAUCHART, W ;
RISLER, T ;
CLAUSSEN, CD .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1993, 16 (02) :95-101
[9]   Incidences of acute kidney injury, dialysis, and graft loss following intravenous administration of low-osmolality iodinated contrast in patients with kidney transplants [J].
Fananapazir, Ghaneh ;
Troppmann, Christoph ;
Corwin, Michael T. ;
Nikpour, Arian M. ;
Naderi, Sima ;
Lamba, Ramit .
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 41 (11) :2182-2186
[10]   Renal artery stenosis in kidney transplants [J].
Fervenza, FC ;
Lafayette, RA ;
Alfrey, EJ ;
Petersen, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1998, 31 (01) :142-148