CD15 focus score: Infection diagnosis and stratification into low-virulence and high-virulence microbial pathogens in periprosthetic joint infection

被引:26
作者
Krenn, V. T. [1 ,2 ]
Liebisch, M. [2 ]
Koelbel, B. [1 ]
Renz, N. [3 ]
Gehrke, T. [4 ]
Huber, M. [5 ]
Krukemeyer, M. G. [6 ]
Trampuz, A. [3 ]
Resch, H. [7 ]
Krenn, V. [1 ]
机构
[1] ZHZMD Trier, Berlin, Germany
[2] Sigmund Freud PrivatUniv, Berlin, Germany
[3] Charite, Ctr Muskuloskeletale Chirurg, Zentrum Sept Chirurg, Berlin, Germany
[4] Helios ENDO Klin, Hamburg, Germany
[5] Otto Wagner Spital, Pathol Bakteriol Inst, Vienna, Austria
[6] Paracelsus Kliniken Deutschland, Osnabruck, Germany
[7] Univ Klin Unfallchirurg & Sporttraumatol, Salzburg, Austria
关键词
Periprosthetic joint infection; CD15 focus score; Neutrophilic granulocytes; Low-virulence and high-virulence; microbial pathogens; HISTOPATHOLOGICAL CONSENSUS CLASSIFICATION; REVISION ARTHROPLASTY TISSUES; SYNOVIAL BIOPSY; GRANULOCYTES; PATHOLOGY; UPDATE; KNEE; HIP;
D O I
10.1016/j.prp.2017.01.002
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Introduction: The aim of the work was to validate the CD15 focus score for the infection pathology of periprosthetic joint infection in a large group and to clarify whether a stratification into low-virulence and high-virulence microbial pathogens is possible by means of the CD15 focus score (quantification of CD15 positive granulocytes). Methods: The histopathology of 275 synovial tissue samples taken intraoperatively during revision operations (n =127 hip, n =141 knee, n =2 shoulder, n =5 ankle) was evaluated according to the SLIM consensus classification (SLIM = synovial-like interface membrane). Neutrophilic granulocytes (NG) were quantified by the CD15 focus score on the basis of the principle of focal maximum infiltration (focus) with evaluation of one field of vision (about 0.3 mm(2)). The quantification values were compared with the microbiological diagnoses taking into consideration the virulence groups of low-virulence and high-virulence microbial pathogens and mixed infection. Results: The patients with positive microbiological findings (n=160) had significantly (p < 0.001, Mann Whitney U test). higher CD15 focus score values than patients with negative microbiological findings (n = 115), the cut-off value being 39 cells per high power field (HPF). The CD15 focus score values of low-virulence microbial pathogens (n = 94) were significantly lower (p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test) than the values of high-virulence microbial pathogens (n = 55), the cut-off value being 106 cells per HPF. Based on the microbiological diagnosis the sensitivity with respect to a microbial infection is 0.91, the specificity 0.92 (PPV= 0.94; NPV= 0.88; accuracy: 0.92; AUC= 0.95). Based on the differentiation of the CD15 focus score values between low-virulence and high-virulence microbes the sensitivity is 0.70 and the specificity 0.77 (PPV= 0.63; NPV= 0.81; accuracy= 0.74; AUC=0.74). Conclusion: As a result of the high sensitivity and specificity, the easy to use CD15 focus score is a diagnostically valid score for microbial periprosthetic infection. A differentiation between low-virulence and high-virulence microorganism of sufficiently high diagnostic quality is additionally possible as a result of the defined quantification of CD15 positive granulocytes (the CD15 focus score) histopathological diagnosis of microbial infections is possible, which on the one hand supports the microbiological diagnosis and on the other hand by the stratification into low-virulence and high-virulence microbial pathogens could represent an additional basis for a pathogen-specific antibiotic treatment in the event of unclear constellations of findings. (C) 2017 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 547
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] The clinical presentation of prosthetic joint infection
    Barrett, Lucinda
    Atkins, Bridget
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2014, 69 : 25 - 28
  • [2] Host-pathogen interactions: The attributes of virulence
    Casadevall, A
    Pirofski, LA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2001, 184 (03) : 337 - 344
  • [3] The value of synovial biopsy, joint aspiration and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of late peri-prosthetic infection of total knee replacements
    Fink, B.
    Makowiak, C.
    Fuerst, M.
    Berger, I.
    Schaefer, P.
    Frommelt, L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2008, 90B (07): : 874 - 878
  • [4] High Diagnostic Value of Synovial Biopsy in Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip
    Fink, Bernd
    Gebhard, Alexander
    Fuerst, Martin
    Berger, Irina
    Schaefer, Peter
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2013, 471 (03) : 956 - 964
  • [5] Use of chloroacetate esterase staining for the histological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection
    Kashima, T. G.
    Inagaki, Y.
    Grammatopoulos, G.
    Athanasou, N. A.
    [J]. VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2015, 466 (05) : 595 - 601
  • [6] Kim N.H., 2016, MICROB DRUG RESIST
  • [7] CD15 focus score for diagnostics of periprosthetic joint infections. Neutrophilic granulocytes quantification mode and the development of morphometric software (CD15 quantifier)
    Koelbel, B.
    Wienert, S.
    Dimitriadis, J.
    Kendoff, D.
    Gehrke, T.
    Huber, M.
    Frommelt, L.
    Tiemann, A.
    Saeger, K.
    Krenn, V.
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR RHEUMATOLOGIE, 2015, 74 (07): : 622 - 630
  • [8] Revised histopathological consensus classification of joint implant related pathology
    Krenn, V.
    Morawietz, L.
    Perino, G.
    Kienapfel, H.
    Ascherl, R.
    Hassenpflug, G. J.
    Thomsen, M.
    Thomas, P.
    Huber, M.
    Kendoff, D.
    Baumhoer, D.
    Krukemeyer, M. G.
    Natu, S.
    Boettner, F.
    Zustin, J.
    Koelbel, B.
    Ruether, W.
    Kretzer, J. P.
    Tiemann, A.
    Trampuz, A.
    Frommelt, L.
    Tichilow, R.
    Soeder, S.
    Mueller, S.
    Parvizi, J.
    Illgner, U.
    Gehrke, T.
    [J]. PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2014, 210 (12) : 779 - 786
  • [9] Applications of molecular pathology in the diagnosis of joint infections
    Kriegsmann, J.
    Hopf, T.
    Jacobs, D.
    Arens, N.
    Krenn, V.
    Schmitt-Wiedhoff, R.
    Kriegsmann, M.
    Heisel, C.
    Biehl, C.
    Thabe, H.
    Schmitz, R. P. H.
    Lehmann, M.
    Otto, M.
    [J]. ORTHOPADE, 2009, 38 (06): : 531 - 538
  • [10] Proposal for a histopathological consensus classification of the periprosthetic interface membrane
    Morawietz, L.
    Classen, R-A
    Schroeder, J. H.
    Dynybil, C.
    Perka, C.
    Skwara, A.
    Neidel, J.
    Gehrke, T.
    Frommelt, L.
    Hansen, T.
    Otto, M.
    Barden, B.
    Aigner, T.
    Stiehl, P.
    Schubert, T.
    Meyer-Scholten, C.
    Koenig, A.
    Stroebel, P.
    Rader, C. P.
    Kirschner, S.
    Lintner, F.
    Ruether, W.
    Bos, I.
    Hendrich, C.
    Kriegsmann, J.
    Krenn, V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2006, 59 (06) : 591 - 597