Promise problems solved by quantum and classical finite automata

被引:10
作者
Zheng, Shenggen [1 ]
Li, Lvzhou [1 ]
Qiu, Daowen [1 ]
Gruska, Jozef [2 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Data & Comp Sci, Inst Comp Sci Theory, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Masaryk Univ, Fac Informat, Brno 60200, Czech Republic
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Promise problems; Quantum computing; Finite automata; Quantum finite automata; Recognizability; Solvability; IMPROVED CONSTRUCTIONS; REGULAR LANGUAGES; STATE COMPLEXITY; SUCCINCTNESS; EQUIVALENCE; ALGORITHMS; MACHINES; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.tcs.2016.12.025
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
The concept of promise problems was introduced and started to be systematically explored by Even, Selman, Yacobi, Goldreich, and other scholars. It has been argued that promise problems should be seen as partial decision problems and as such that they are more fundamental than decision problems and formal languages that used to be considered as the basic ones for complexity theory. The main purpose of this paper is to explore the promise problems accepted by classical, quantum and also semi-quantum finite automata. More specifically, we first introduce two acceptance modes of promise problems, recognizability and solvability, and explore their basic properties. Afterwards, we show several results concerning descriptional complexity on promise problems. In particular, we prove: (1) there is a promise problem that can be recognized exactly by measure-once one-way quantum finite automata (M0-1QFA), but no deterministic finite automata (DFA) can recognize it; (2) there is a promise problem that can be solved with error probability is an element of <1/3 by one-way finite automaton with quantum and classical states (1QCFA), but no oneway probability finite automaton (PFA) can solve it with error probability is an element of <= 1/3; and especially, (3) there are promise problems A(p) with size p that can be solved with any error probability by MO-1QFA with only two quantum basis states, but they can not be solved exactly by any MO-1QFA with two quantum basis states; in contrast, the minimal PFA solving A(p) with any error probability (usually smaller than 1/2) has p states. Finally, we mention a number of problems related to promise for further study. 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 64
页数:17
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   1-way quantum finite automata: strengths, weaknesses and generalizations [J].
Ambainis, A ;
Freivalds, R .
39TH ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 1998, :332-341
[2]   Two-way finite automata with quantum and classical states [J].
Ambainis, A ;
Watrous, J .
THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2002, 287 (01) :299-311
[3]   Superiority of exact quantum automata for promise problems [J].
Ambainis, Andris ;
Yakaryilmaz, Abuzer .
INFORMATION PROCESSING LETTERS, 2012, 112 (07) :289-291
[4]   Improved constructions of quantum automata [J].
Ambainis, Andris ;
Nahimovs, Nikolajs .
THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2009, 410 (20) :1916-1922
[5]  
[Anonymous], FINITE STATE BASED M
[6]  
[Anonymous], LNCS
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Quantum Computing
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1979, INTRO AUTOMATA THEOR
[9]   Some formal tools for analyzing quantum automata [J].
Bertoni, A ;
Mereghetti, C ;
Palano, B .
THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2006, 356 (1-2) :14-25
[10]  
Bertoni A., 2003, International Journal of Foundations of Computer Science, V14, P871, DOI 10.1142/S0129054103002060