Which uncertainty is powerful to forecast crude oil market volatility? New evidence

被引:79
作者
Li, Xiafei [1 ]
Wei, Yu [2 ]
Chen, Xiaodan [2 ]
Ma, Feng [1 ]
Liang, Chao [1 ]
Chen, Wang [3 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Yunnan Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Finance, 237 Longquan Rd, Kunming, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[3] Yangtze Normal Univ, Coll Finance & Econ, Chongqing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Crude oil market volatility; GARCH‐ MIDAS; uncertainty indices; volatility forecasting; STOCK-MARKET; MACROECONOMIC FUNDAMENTALS; REALIZED VOLATILITY; PRICE VOLATILITY; ANYTHING BEAT; TIME-SERIES; SHORT-TERM; RETURNS; MODEL; SAMPLE;
D O I
10.1002/ijfe.2371
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper focuses on distinguishing the predictive power of five newly developed uncertainty indices, that is, global and US economic policy uncertainty (GEPU and US EPU), global geopolitical risk (GPR), US monetary policy uncertainty (MPU) and equity market volatility (EMV), on crude oil market volatility. We construct the extended GARCH-MIDAS models to assess the forecasting ability of these indices and then compare them with four commonly used oil volatility drivers: oil supply, oil demand, oil speculation and interest rate. Firstly, the in-sample analysis suggests that all uncertainty indices and traditional determinants have significant impacts on oil volatility. Secondly, the out-of-sample evaluations suggest that US MPU, EMV and EPU indices are more powerful than other predictors to improve the forecasting accuracy of crude oil volatility, and US EMV exhibits the best prediction ability. Then, we find that EPU and MPU indices are more effective in forecasting high volatility in crude oil market, while traditional determinants together with US EMV index are more helpful in predicting low oil volatility. Finally, the forecasts of bad oil volatility can be improved by all predictors except for GEPU index, while the forecasts of good oil volatility can only be enhanced by US MPU, EMV and EPU.
引用
收藏
页码:4279 / 4297
页数:19
相关论文
共 81 条
[11]   The role of jumps and leverage in forecasting volatility in international equity markets [J].
Buncic, Daniel ;
Gisler, Katja I. M. .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2017, 79 :1-19
[12]  
Calderon D. E., 2018, 2018 AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, P1
[13]   Predicting excess stock returns out of sample: Can anything beat the historical average? [J].
Campbell, John Y. ;
Thompson, Samuel B. .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2008, 21 (04) :1509-1531
[14]   Forecasting crude-oil market volatility: Further evidence with jumps [J].
Charles, Amelie ;
Darne, Olivier .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2017, 67 :508-519
[15]   Modeling and forecasting crude oil markets using ARCH-type models [J].
Cheong, Chin Wen .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (06) :2346-2355
[16]   Approximately normal tests for equal predictive accuracy in nested models [J].
Clark, Todd E. ;
West, Kenneth D. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2007, 138 (01) :291-311
[17]   The variance risk premium and fundamental uncertainty [J].
Conrad, Christian ;
Loch, Karin .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2015, 132 :56-60
[18]   Modelling the world oil market:: Assessment of a quarterly econometric model [J].
Dees, Stephane ;
Karadeloglou, Pavlos ;
Kaufmann, Robert K. ;
Sanchez, Marcelo .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (01) :178-191
[19]   DISTRIBUTION OF THE ESTIMATORS FOR AUTOREGRESSIVE TIME-SERIES WITH A UNIT ROOT [J].
DICKEY, DA ;
FULLER, WA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1979, 74 (366) :427-431
[20]   COMPARING PREDICTIVE ACCURACY [J].
DIEBOLD, FX ;
MARIANO, RS .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 1995, 13 (03) :253-263