Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) following mastectomy with breast reconstruction or without reconstruction: a systematic review

被引:49
|
作者
Cordova, Leonardo Z. [1 ]
Hunter-Smith, David J. [1 ]
Rozen, Warren M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Peninsula Hlth, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Hand Surg, Frankston, Australia
关键词
Breast cancer; patient reported outcome measures (PROM); breast reconstruction; mastectomy; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; BODY-IMAGE; EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION; CONSERVING SURGERY; QUESTIONNAIRE MODULE; CANCER SURGERY; SELF-ESTEEM; WOMEN; SATISFACTION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.21037/gs.2019.07.02
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The cornerstone of reconstructive surgery following mastectomy is to restore cosmesis and improve physical and psychological health. Consequently, it has become essential for instruments that measure surgical outcomes to include the direct perspective of patients. Many reviews have failed to show significant improvements in quality of life domains following breast reconstruction compared to mastectomy alone. However, with advances in surgical techniques and patient reported outcome measure (PROM) assessment tools designed precisely for breast reconstruction patients, a modern systematic review is warranted. An electronic literature review was performed using CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Medline (using PubMed) comparing patient reported outcome measures of patients undergoing mastectomy alone versus patients undergoing mastectomy with breast reconstruction. Studies in the English and Portuguese languages since the year 2000 were included. The review was undertaken adhering to PRISMA guidelines with last entry on the 31/5/2018. Full text review yield 42 articles of relevance to the inclusion criteria. The most widely used PROM instruments such as Breast-Q, EORTC-Q30/Q23, Short Form 36, FACT-B and others are explored. The specific difficulties conducting such studies and biases identified arc investigated further. Studies comparing mastectomy alone against mastectomy with reconstruction show difficulties forming groups with similar clinical and epidemiological characteristics. There are inherent limitations to performing a randomised controlled trial on this topic, including matching patient groups in terms of age, socioeconomical background and cancer staging, and this affects the results of the PROM instruments. Within these limitations, the literature suggests that PROM support the use of breast reconstruction following mastectomy but care must be made selecting patients. The finding is supported by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines which state that breast reconstruction should be offered to all women undergoing breast cancer surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 451
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Abdominal Morbidity following TRAM Flap Breast Reconstruction - Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
    Kropf, N.
    Reavey, P.
    McCarthy, C. M.
    Cordeiro, P. G.
    Pusic, A. L.
    HANDCHIRURGIE MIKROCHIRURGIE PLASTISCHE CHIRURGIE, 2009, 41 (06) : 374 - 377
  • [22] Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in hyperhidrosis: a systematic review
    Gabes, Michaela
    Knuettel, Helge
    Kann, Gesina
    Tischer, Christina
    Apfelbacher, Christian J.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2022, 31 (03) : 671 - 686
  • [23] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the management of lung cancer: A systematic review
    Ben Bouazza, Youssef
    Chiairi, Ibrahim
    El Kharbouchi, Ouiam
    De Backer, Lesley
    Vanhoutte, Greetje
    Janssens, Annelies
    Van Meerbeeck, Jan P.
    LUNG CANCER, 2017, 113 : 140 - 151
  • [24] Measuring Quality of Life in Oncologic Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
    Chen, Constance M.
    Cano, Stefan J.
    Klassen, Anne F.
    King, Tari
    McCarthy, Colleen
    Cordeiro, Peter G.
    Morrow, Monica
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2010, 16 (06) : 587 - 597
  • [25] Patient reported outcome measures following specialist nurse-led clinics in preparation for breast reconstruction surgery
    Osborne, Caroline L. E.
    Court, Fiona G.
    O'Donoghue, Joseph M.
    Keeton, Sue E.
    Heary, Sara
    Blyth, Kirsty M.
    Grant, Bridie
    BREAST, 2010, 19 (05) : 428 - 431
  • [26] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Breast Cancer Surgery
    Kim, Minji
    Graziano, Francis D.
    Tadros, Audree B.
    Allen Jr, Robert J.
    Nelson, Jonas A.
    CURRENT SURGERY REPORTS, 2024, 12 (05) : 67 - 75
  • [27] A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in cystic fibrosis
    Ratnayake, Irushi
    Ahern, Susannah
    Ruseckaite, Rasa
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (10):
  • [28] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in paediatric ophthalmology: a systematic review
    Tadic, Valerija
    Hogan, Ailbhe
    Sobti, Nidhi
    Knowles, Rachel Louise
    Rahi, Jugnoo Sangeeta
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 97 (11) : 1369 - 1381
  • [29] Patient-reported outcome measures following gynecomastia correction: a systematic review
    Barone M.
    Cogliandro A.
    Morelli Coppola M.
    Cassotta G.
    Di Stefano N.
    Tambone V.
    Persichetti P.
    European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2018, 41 (2) : 109 - 118
  • [30] A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Transsexual Surgery
    M. Barone
    A. Cogliandro
    N. Di Stefano
    V. Tambone
    P. Persichetti
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2017, 41 : 700 - 713