Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) following mastectomy with breast reconstruction or without reconstruction: a systematic review

被引:49
|
作者
Cordova, Leonardo Z. [1 ]
Hunter-Smith, David J. [1 ]
Rozen, Warren M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Peninsula Hlth, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Hand Surg, Frankston, Australia
关键词
Breast cancer; patient reported outcome measures (PROM); breast reconstruction; mastectomy; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; BODY-IMAGE; EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION; CONSERVING SURGERY; QUESTIONNAIRE MODULE; CANCER SURGERY; SELF-ESTEEM; WOMEN; SATISFACTION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.21037/gs.2019.07.02
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The cornerstone of reconstructive surgery following mastectomy is to restore cosmesis and improve physical and psychological health. Consequently, it has become essential for instruments that measure surgical outcomes to include the direct perspective of patients. Many reviews have failed to show significant improvements in quality of life domains following breast reconstruction compared to mastectomy alone. However, with advances in surgical techniques and patient reported outcome measure (PROM) assessment tools designed precisely for breast reconstruction patients, a modern systematic review is warranted. An electronic literature review was performed using CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Medline (using PubMed) comparing patient reported outcome measures of patients undergoing mastectomy alone versus patients undergoing mastectomy with breast reconstruction. Studies in the English and Portuguese languages since the year 2000 were included. The review was undertaken adhering to PRISMA guidelines with last entry on the 31/5/2018. Full text review yield 42 articles of relevance to the inclusion criteria. The most widely used PROM instruments such as Breast-Q, EORTC-Q30/Q23, Short Form 36, FACT-B and others are explored. The specific difficulties conducting such studies and biases identified arc investigated further. Studies comparing mastectomy alone against mastectomy with reconstruction show difficulties forming groups with similar clinical and epidemiological characteristics. There are inherent limitations to performing a randomised controlled trial on this topic, including matching patient groups in terms of age, socioeconomical background and cancer staging, and this affects the results of the PROM instruments. Within these limitations, the literature suggests that PROM support the use of breast reconstruction following mastectomy but care must be made selecting patients. The finding is supported by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines which state that breast reconstruction should be offered to all women undergoing breast cancer surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 451
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] National long-term patient-reported outcomes following mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction: The Swedish Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study Part 2 (SweBRO 2)
    Gumuscu, Rojda
    Unukovych, Dmytro
    Warnberg, Fredrik
    de Boniface, Jana
    Sund, Malin
    Ahsberg, Kristina
    Hansson, Emma
    Folkvaljon, Folke
    Mani, Maria
    BJS OPEN, 2024, 8 (01):
  • [2] Patient-Reported Outcomes of Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy: A Systematic Review
    Lee, Clara
    Sunu, Christine
    Pignone, Michael
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2009, 209 (01) : 123 - 133
  • [3] Patient-reported upper extremity impairment following mastectomy with breast reconstruction: A systematic review
    Carr, Hannah
    Gonzalez, Miguel
    Shubeck, Sarah
    Beederman, Maureen R.
    Maassen, Nicholas H.
    Hanson, Summer E.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2025, 103 : 233 - 247
  • [4] Decisional regret and choice of breast reconstruction following mastectomy for breast cancer: A systematic review
    Flitcroft, Kathy
    Brennan, Meagan
    Spillane, Andrew
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2018, 27 (04) : 1110 - 1120
  • [5] Making decisions about breast reconstruction: A systematic review of patient-reported factors influencing choice
    Flitcroft, Kathy
    Brennan, Meagan
    Spillane, Andrew
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (09) : 2287 - 2319
  • [6] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Post-mastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Development and Measurement Properties
    Davies, C. F.
    Macefield, R.
    Avery, K.
    Blazeby, J. M.
    Potter, S.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (01) : 386 - 404
  • [7] Patient reported outcome measures in a cohort of patients at high risk of breast cancer treated by bilateral risk reducing mastectomy and breast reconstruction
    Gandhi, A.
    Duxbury, P.
    Murphy, J.
    Foden, P.
    Lalloo, F.
    Clancy, T.
    Wisely, J.
    Kirwan, C. C.
    Howell, A.
    Evans, D. G.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2022, 75 (01) : 69 - 76
  • [8] The use of Patient Reported Outcome Measures in assessing patient outcomes when comparing autologous to alloplastic breast reconstruction: a systematic review
    Phan, Robert
    Hunter-Smith, David J.
    Rozen, Warren M.
    GLAND SURGERY, 2019, 8 (04) : 452 - 460
  • [9] The Importance of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Oncological Vulvoperineal Defect Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Speck, Nicole E.
    Stoffel, Julia
    Wendelspiess, Severin
    Appenzeller-Herzog, Christian
    Schaefer, Kristin M.
    Kouba, Loraine P.
    Rueter, Florian
    Montavon, Celine
    Heinzelmann-Schwarz, Viola
    Haug, Martin D.
    Schaefer, Dirk J.
    Ismail, Tarek
    Kappos, Elisabeth A.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (10) : 6300 - 6313
  • [10] Patient-reported outcome of their breast reconstruction after mastectomy
    Robiolle, C.
    Quillet, A.
    Dagregorio, G.
    Huguier, V.
    ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE PLASTIQUE ESTHETIQUE, 2015, 60 (03): : 201 - 207