DXA body composition corrective factors between Hologic Discovery models to conduct multicenter studies

被引:10
作者
Sutter, Thibault [1 ]
Duboeuf, Francois [3 ]
Chapurlat, Roland [3 ]
Cortet, Bernard [4 ]
Lespessailles, Eric [1 ,2 ]
Roux, Jean-Paul [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Orleans, EA Lab I3MTO 4708, Orleans, France
[2] Reg Hosp Orleans, Dept Rheumatol, Orleans, France
[3] Univ Lyon, INSERM UMR 1033, Hop Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France
[4] Univ Lille, Univ Hosp Lille, Dept Rheumatol, EA4490, Lille, France
关键词
DXA; Cross-calibration; Whole body composition; Bone mineral density; ENERGY X-RAY; COMPOSITION CROSS-CALIBRATION; PENCIL-BEAM; ABSORPTIOMETRY; DENSITOMETRY; PRECISION; LUNAR;
D O I
10.1016/j.bone.2020.115683
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Dual X-ray absorptiometry body composition measurements are widely used for clinical and research settings. It is well known that measurements vary across instruments, needing caution for longitudinal monitoring or multicentric studies. This study was to quantify intra- and inter-center variability of bone mineral content, bone mineral density, fat and lean body composition measurements between Hologic Discovery models in order to calculate the corrective factors to be applied for multicenter research projects. Materials and methods: A whole body phantom composed of materials representing the thickness and percentage of bone, lean and fat mass in the human physiological range was analyzed ten times in three different centers using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry scanners (Two Hologic Discovery QDR A and one QDR W). In addition, we used a morphometric vertebral phantom to monitor stability and a three steps block phantom to check accuracy. Results: We found a good long-term stability and accuracy for the three devices. Intra-center coefficients of variation were within the range of the manufacturer acceptable values (bone mineral density: 1.40%, bone mineral content: 1%, area: 1.50%, fat mass: 0.89%, lean mass: 0.76%, total mass: 0.12%). Whereas the inter-center coefficient of variation exceeded 8% (bone mineral density: 8.18%, bone mineral content: 3.03%, area: 8.63%: fat mass: 3,92%, lean mass: 7.89%, total mass: 2.85%). Conclusion: Our study showed that the discrepancies across centers remain a major concern, particularly with regard to body composition results. Our study highlight the need of cross calibration between densitometers and proposes corrective factors evaluated from a whole body phantom to lead multicentric studies adjustment.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] CROSS CALIBRATION OF QDR-2000 AND QDR-1000 DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY DENSITOMETERS FOR BONE-MINERAL AND SOFT-TISSUE MEASUREMENTS
    ABRAHAMSEN, B
    GRAM, J
    HANSEN, TB
    BECKNIELSEN, H
    [J]. BONE, 1995, 16 (03) : 385 - 390
  • [2] Clinical applications of body composition measurements using DXA
    Albanese, CV
    Diessel, E
    Genant, HK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2003, 6 (02) : 75 - 85
  • [3] Barnett S, 2019, IMPLEMENT SCI, V14
  • [4] DXA parameters: Beyond bone mineral density
    Briot, Karine
    [J]. JOINT BONE SPINE, 2013, 80 (03) : 265 - 269
  • [5] Carlson-Newberry S.J., 1997, DUAL ENERGY XRAY ABS
  • [6] Regional Body Composition: Cross-calibration of DXA Scanners-QDR4500W and Discovery Wi
    Covey, Margaret K.
    Berry, Jean K.
    Hacker, Eileen D.
    [J]. OBESITY, 2010, 18 (03) : 632 - 637
  • [7] Clinical use of bone densitometry - Scientific review
    Cummings, SR
    Bates, D
    Black, DM
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (15): : 1889 - 1897
  • [8] Evaluation of a new body composition phantom for quality control and cross-calibration of DXA devices
    Diessel, E
    Fuerst, T
    Njeh, CF
    Tylavsky, F
    Cauley, J
    Dockrell, M
    Genant, HK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 89 (02) : 599 - 605
  • [9] Economos CD, 1996, J BONE MINER RES, V11, P275
  • [10] Bone mineral and body composition measurements: Cross-calibration of pencil-beam and fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers
    Ellis, KJ
    Shypailo, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1998, 13 (10) : 1613 - 1618