Maturity Improvements in Flood Protection Asset Management across the North Sea Region

被引:4
|
作者
Gersonius, Berry [1 ]
Vonk, Bart [2 ]
Ashley, Richard M. [3 ]
den Heijer, Frank [4 ]
Klerk, Wouter Jan [5 ]
Manojlovic, Natasa [6 ]
Rijke, Jeroen [4 ]
Sayers, Paul [7 ]
Pathirana, Assela [8 ]
机构
[1] ResilienServices, NL-2613 PN Delft, Netherlands
[2] Rijkswaterstaat, NL-3526 LA Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] EcoFutures Ltd, Honley HD9 6JW, Holmfirth, England
[4] HAN Univ Appl Sci, Sustainable River Management Grp, Ruitenberglaan 26, NL-6826 CC Arnhem, Netherlands
[5] Deltares, NL-2629 HV Delft, Netherlands
[6] Hamburg Univ Technol, Wasserbau, D-21073 Hamburg, Germany
[7] Sayers & Partners, Watlington OX49 5PY, England
[8] UNDP, Male 20026, Maldives
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
asset management; climate change adaptation; flood protection; flood risk management; maturity analysis;
D O I
10.3390/infrastructures5120112
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
North Sea Region countries depend heavily on flood protection infrastructure, such as dikes, dams, sluices and flood gates. Knowledge on where, when and how much to invest to ensure functioning is of crucial importance for asset owners and operators. This requires asset management approaches that are adaptable, respond to feedback and function within various contexts. The FAIR (Flood defense infrastructure Asset management & Investment in Renovation, adaptation, optimisation and maintenance) project has developed a unique framework to ensure that asset management processes are adaptive, comprehensive and make effective connections across strategic, tactical and operational contexts. The framework has for the first time informed an assessment of maturity of five flood protection asset management organisations in the North Sea Region, using a seven-factor maturity assessment model. This paper describes the self-assessment process and the self-reported maturity changes during the project. Maturity assessments were undertaken on two occasions, at the start of the project, and again toward the end. This has revealed how the baseline level of maturity for each organisation developed over the course of the three-year project. The observed maturity changes indicate that adopting the FAIR framework has added value in improving current approaches to asset management.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Adaptive Asset Management for Flood Protection: The FAIR Framework in Action
    Vonk, Bart
    Klerk, Wouter Jan
    Frohle, Peter
    Gersonius, Berry
    den Heijer, Frank
    Jordan, Philipp
    Ciocan, Ulf Radu
    Rijke, Jeroen
    Sayers, Paul
    Ashley, Richard
    INFRASTRUCTURES, 2020, 5 (12) : 1 - 16
  • [2] A Framework for Cloud to Coast Adaptation: Maturity and Experiences from across the North Sea
    Sayers, Paul
    Gersonius, Berry
    Ozerol, Gul
    Nugraha, Erwin
    Schipper, Cor A.
    LAND, 2022, 11 (06)
  • [3] From Flood Protection to Flood Risk Management: Insights from the Rhine River in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
    Fabian Thomas
    Kathrin Knüppe
    Water Resources Management, 2016, 30 : 2785 - 2800
  • [4] From Flood Protection to Flood Risk Management: Insights from the Rhine River in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
    Thomas, Fabian
    Knueppe, Kathrin
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2016, 30 (08) : 2785 - 2800
  • [5] Mitigating infrastructure disaster losses through asset management practices in the Middle East and North Africa region
    Mastroianni, Elyssa
    Lancaster, James
    Korkmann, Benjamin
    Opdyke, Aaron
    Beitelmal, Wesam
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2021, 53
  • [6] Urban water management and climate change adaptation: A self-assessment study by seven midsize cities in the North Sea Region
    Ozerol, Gul
    Dolman, Nanco
    Bormann, Helge
    Bressers, Hans
    Lulofs, Kris
    Boege, Mike
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2020, 55