The bridge between two worlds: psychoanalysis and fMRI

被引:2
作者
Marini, Stefano [1 ]
Di Tizio, Laura [1 ]
Dezi, Sira [1 ]
Armuzzi, Silvia [1 ]
Pelaccia, Simona [2 ]
Valchera, Alessandro [3 ]
Sepede, Gianna [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Girinelli, Gabriella [5 ]
De Berardis, Domenico [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Martinotti, Giovanni [1 ]
Gambi, Francesco [1 ]
Di Giannantonio, Massimo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ G DAnnunzio, Dept Neurosci & Imaging, Chair Psychiat, Via Vestini, I-66100 Chieti, Italy
[2] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Neurosci Mental Hlth & Sense Organs, Dept Unit Psychol Med, St Andrea Hosp,Sch Med & Psychol, Rome, Italy
[3] Hermanas Hosp, Villa S Giuseppe Hosp, Ascoli Piceno, Italy
[4] Univ A Moro, Dept Basic Med Sci Neurosci & Sense Organs, Bari, Italy
[5] Hosp G Mazzini, NHS, Dept Mental Hlth Psychiat Serv Diag & Treatment, Teramo, Italy
关键词
fMRI; neuropsychoanalysis; neuroscience; psychoanalysis; psychodynamic psychotherapy; KAROLINSKA PSYCHODYNAMIC PROFILE; TORONTO-ALEXITHYMIA-SCALE; INTELLECTUAL FRAMEWORK; BRAIN ACTIVATION; CROSS-VALIDATION; NEURAL ACTIVITY; REM-SLEEP; PSYCHOTHERAPY; NEUROSCIENCE; DEPRESSION;
D O I
10.1515/revneuro-2015-0031
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
In recent years, a connection between psychoanalysis and neuroscience has been sought. The meeting point between these two branches is represented by neuropsychoanalysis. The goal of the relationship between psychoanalysis and neuroscience is to test psychoanalytic hypotheses in the human brain, using a scientific method. A literature search was conducted on May 2015. PubMed and Scopus databases were used to find studies for the inclusion in the systematic review. Common results of the studies investigated are represented by a reduction, a modulation, or a normalization of the activation patterns found after the psychoanalytic therapy. New findings in the possible and useful relationship between psychoanalysis and neuroscience could change the modalities of relating to patients for psychoanalysts and the way in which neuroscientists plan their research. Researchers should keep in mind that in any scientific research that has to do with people, neuroscience and a scientific method cannot avoid subjective interpretation.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 229
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Psychoanalysis and Neuroscience: The Bridge Between Mind and Brain
    Cieri, Filippo
    Esposito, Roberto
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [2] Editorial: The Interface between Psychoanalysis and Neuroscience: the State of the Art
    di Giannantonio, Massimo
    Northoff, Georg
    Salone, Anatolia
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 14
  • [3] The Interface between Neuroscience and Neuro-Psychoanalysis: Focus on Brain Connectivity
    Salone, Anatolia
    Di Giacinto, Alessandra
    Lai, Carlo
    De Berardis, Domenico
    Iasevoli, Felice
    Fornaro, Michele
    De Risio, Luisa
    Santacroce, Rita
    Martinotti, Giovanni
    Di Giannantonio, Massimo
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 10
  • [4] Reflections on the Relationship between Neuroscience and Psychoanalysis
    Castellanos, Sergio
    UNIVERSITAS PSYCHOLOGICA, 2010, 9 (03) : 729 - 735
  • [6] The Experience of Pleasure: A Perspective Between Neuroscience and Psychoanalysis
    Moccia, Lorenzo
    Mazza, Marianna
    Di Nicola, Marco
    Janiri, Luigi
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 12
  • [7] Psychoanalysis and academia: Psychoanalysis at the crossroads between exact and human sciences
    Bazan, Ariane
    INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF PSYCHOANALYSIS, 2018, 27 (02) : 90 - 97
  • [8] Trauma between neuroscience and psychoanalysis
    Cabelguen, Clemence
    Rabeyron, Thomas
    ANNALES MEDICO-PSYCHOLOGIQUES, 2019, 177 (03): : 263 - 271
  • [9] Conflict and resolution. A historical perspective on the relationship between the neurosciences and psychoanalysis
    Matthis, I
    PSYCHO-NEURO-ENDOCRINO-IMMUNOLOGY (PNEI): A COMMON LANGUAGE FOR THE WHOLE HUMAN BODY, 2002, 1241 : 339 - 344
  • [10] Dimensions in the dialogue between psychoanalysis and neuroscience
    Lehtonen, Johannes
    INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF PSYCHOANALYSIS, 2010, 19 (04) : 218 - 223