Chemotherapy regimens used in the treatment of gestational trophoblastic Philippine general hospital - Treatment outcomes and toxicity

被引:0
作者
Cagayan, Ma. Stephanie Fay S.
Gacoba, Maria Cresencia C.
机构
[1] Univ Philippines, Coll Med, Dept Pharmacol & Toxicol, Philippine Gen Hosp, Manila, Philippines
[2] Univ Philippines, Coll Med, Sect Trophoblast Dis, Philippine Gen Hosp,Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Manila, Philippines
关键词
gestational trophoblastic neoplasms; drug toxicity; cancer chemotherapy protocols; Philippines;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To describe different chemotherapy regimens used in the treatment of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN). METHODS: A retrospective study of GTN cases from January 1999 to December 2004 at Philippine General Hospital was done. Patients with nonmetastatic and metastatic low-risk disease were managed by single-agent chemotherapy. Those with high-risk disease were given multiple-agent chemotherapy. RESULTS: Forty-five percent of patients (87/193) manifested adverse reactions to chemotherapy. Adverse effects include anemia in 51.7% (45/87), leukopenia in 16% (14/87), neutropenia in 72.4% (63/87) and elevated liver enzymes in 21.8% (19/87). Symptoms included vomiting in 9.1% (8/87) of cases, diarrhea in 6.8% (6/87), stomatitis in 24.14% (21/87) and febrile neutropenia in 19.5% (17/87). There was a significant difference between the 3 groups of regimens in terms of anemia (p = 0.002), leukopenia (p = 0.011), neutropenia (p < 0.001) and stomatitis (p < 0.001). Patients treated with etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin (ACT), cyclophosphamide and vineristine and with etoposide, methotrexate, ACT, taxanes and cisplatin experienced most of the toxicity. CONCLUSION: In the Philippine General Hospital, methotrexate is first-line. single-agent chemotherapy for low-risk GTN. Etoposide, methotrexate, ACT, cyelophosphamide and vincristine regimen are the first line for high-risk metastatic GTN. Present regimens are effective but predispose patients to a variety of toxicities. Patients' acceptance and tolerance of adverse effects and ability to secure drug resources are factors contributing to the success of the treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:907 / 918
页数:12
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
AZAB M, 1989, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V64, P1829, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19891101)64:9<1829::AID-CNCR2820640912>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-G
[3]   EMA/CO for high-risk gestational trophoblastic tumors: Results from a cohort of 272 patients [J].
Bower, M ;
Newlands, ES ;
Holden, L ;
Short, D ;
Brock, C ;
Rustin, GJS ;
Begent, RHJ ;
Bagshawe, KD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (07) :2636-2643
[4]   Treatment of low risk gestational trophoblastic disease [J].
Carney, ME .
CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 46 (03) :579-592
[5]   Single-agent pulse dactinomycin has only modest activity for methotrexate-resistant gestational trophoblastic neoplasia [J].
Chen, LM ;
Lengyel, ER ;
Powell, CB .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2004, 94 (01) :204-207
[6]  
DUBESHTER B, 1989, J REPROD MED, V64, P1829
[7]   Treatment of high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia with etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide, and vincristine chemotherapy [J].
Escobar, PF ;
Lurain, JR ;
Singh, DK ;
Bozorgi, K ;
Fishman, DA .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2003, 91 (03) :552-557
[8]  
HANCOCK BW, 2002, GESTATIONAL TROPHOBL, P337
[9]  
HOMESLEY HD, 2002, GESTATIONAL TROPHOBL, P293
[10]   Treatment of resistant gestational choriocarcinoma with Taxol: A report of two cases [J].
Jones, WB ;
Schneider, J ;
Shapiro, F ;
Lewis, JL .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1996, 61 (01) :126-130