The cognitive neuroscience revolution

被引:92
作者
Boone, Worth [1 ]
Piccinini, Gualtiero [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] Univ Missouri, St Louis, MO 63121 USA
关键词
Cognitive neuroscience; Multilevel mechanisms; Explanation; Integration; Computation; Representation; COMPUTATIONAL EXPLANATION; MECHANISTIC EXPLANATION; TACIT KNOWLEDGE; MENTAL-IMAGERY; MODELS; MIND; THINKING; SEARCH; BRAIN; REPRESENTATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s11229-015-0783-4
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
We outline a framework of multilevel neurocognitive mechanisms that incorporates representation and computation. We argue that paradigmatic explanations in cognitive neuroscience fit this framework and thus that cognitive neuroscience constitutes a revolutionary break from traditional cognitive science. Whereas traditional cognitive scientific explanations were supposed to be distinct and autonomous from mechanistic explanations, neurocognitive explanations aim to be mechanistic through and through. Neurocognitive explanations aim to integrate computational and representational functions and structures across multiple levels of organization in order to explain cognition. To a large extent, practicing cognitive neuroscientists have already accepted this shift, but philosophical theory has not fully acknowledged and appreciated its significance. As a result, the explanatory framework underlying cognitive neuroscience has remained largely implicit. We explicate this framework and demonstrate its contrast with previous approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:1509 / 1534
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Towards a Cognitive Neuroscience of Intentionality [J].
Alex Morgan ;
Gualtiero Piccinini .
Minds and Machines, 2018, 28 :119-139
[22]   A feminist standpoint for cognitive neuroscience [J].
Vanessa A. Bentley .
Synthese, 206 (1)
[23]   The importance of diversity in cognitive neuroscience [J].
Dotson, Vonetta M. ;
Duarte, Audrey .
ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 2020, 1464 (01) :181-191
[24]   The future of fMRI in cognitive neuroscience [J].
Poldrack, Russell A. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2012, 62 (02) :1216-1220
[25]   The cognitive neuroscience of crossmodal correspondences [J].
Spence, Charles ;
Parise, Cesare V. .
I-PERCEPTION, 2012, 3 (07) :410-412
[26]   Against neuroclassicism: On the perils of armchair neuroscience [J].
Morgan, Alex .
MIND & LANGUAGE, 2022, 37 (03) :329-355
[27]   Connecting Education and Cognitive Neuroscience: Where will the journey take us? [J].
Ansari, Daniel ;
Coch, Donna ;
De Smedt, Bert .
EDUCATIONAL PHILOSOPHY AND THEORY, 2011, 43 (01) :37-42
[28]   Abductive reasoning in cognitive neuroscience: weak and strong reverse inference [J].
Calzavarini, Fabrizio ;
Cevolani, Gustavo .
SYNTHESE, 2022, 200 (02)
[29]   Context-sensitive computational mechanistic explanation in cognitive neuroscience [J].
de Wit, Matthieu M. ;
Matheson, Heath E. .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
[30]   COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE [J].
MULDER, G ;
WIJERS, AA ;
LANGE, JJ ;
SMID, HGOM ;
GUNTER, T ;
PETERS, MJ .
EEG-EMG-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ELEKTROENZEPHALOGRAPHIE ELEKTROMYOGRAPHIE UND VERWANDTE GEBIETE, 1993, 24 (01) :5-15