Influence of land use on bacterial and archaeal diversity and community structures in three natural ecosystems and one agricultural soil

被引:33
|
作者
Lynn, Tin Mar [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Qiong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hu, Yajun [1 ,2 ]
Yuan, Hongzhao [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Xiaohong [1 ,5 ]
Khai, Aye Aye [4 ]
Wu, Jinshui [1 ,2 ]
Ge, Tida [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Subtrop Agr, Key Lab Agroecol Proc Subtrop Reg, Changsha 410125, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Changsha Observat & Res Stn Agr Environm, Changsha 410125, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Minist Educ, Biotechnol Res Dept, Kyaukse 100301, Myanmar
[5] Cent South Univ Forestry & Technol, Fac Life Sci & Technol, Changsha 410004, Hunan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Natural ecosystems; Bacterial diversity; Archaeal diversity; Molecular analyses; Abiotic factors; FOREST; CARBON; ABUNDANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00203-017-1347-4
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Studying shifts in microbial communities under different land use can help in determining the impact of land use on microbial diversity. In this study, we analyzed four different land-use types to determine their bacterial and archaeal diversity and abundance. Three natural ecosystems, that is, wetland (WL), grassland (GL), and forest (FR) soils, and one agricultural soil, that is, tea plantation (TP) soil, were investigated to determine how land use shapes bacterial and archaeal diversity. For this purpose, molecular analyses, such as quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR), 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP), were used. Soil physicochemical properties were determined, and statistical analyses were performed to identify the key factors affecting microbial diversity in these soils. Phylogenetic affiliations determined using the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) database and T-RFLP revealed that the soils had differing bacterial diversity. WL soil was rich in only Proteobacteria, whereas GR soil was rich in Proteobacteria, followed by Actinobacteria. FR soil had higher abundance of Chloroflexi species than these soils. TP soil was rich in Actinobacteria, followed by Chloroflexi, Acidobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Firmicutes. The archaeal diversity of GL and FR soils was similar in that most of their sequences were closely related to Nitrososphaerales (Thaumarchaeota phylum). In contrast, WL soil, followed by TP soil, had greater archaeal diversity than other soils. Eight different archaeal classes were found in WL soil, and Pacearchaeota class was the richest one. The abundance of bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA gene copies in WL and GL soils was significantly higher than that in FR and TP soils. Redundancy analysis showed that bacterial diversity was influenced by abiotic factors, e.g., total organic carbon and pH, whereas total nitrogen, pH, and cation exchange capacity (CEC) significantly affected archaeal community composition. Pearson correlation analysis showed that bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA gene abundance had the highest correlation with clay content (r > 0.905, P < 0.01), followed by total-P, CEC, pH, and silt (%). These results will lead to more comprehensive understanding of how land use affects microbial distribution.
引用
收藏
页码:711 / 721
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Variations in Soil Bacterial Community Diversity and Structures Among Different Revegetation Types in the Baishilazi Nature Reserve
    Deng, Jiaojiao
    Yin, You
    Zhu, Wenxu
    Zhou, Yongbin
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [42] Responses of soil microbial diversity, network complexity and multifunctionality to three land-use changes
    Yang, Yi
    Chai, Yabo
    Xie, Hanjie
    Zhang, Lu
    Zhang, Zhiming
    Yang, Xue
    Hao, Shenglei
    Gai, Jingping
    Chen, Yongliang
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 859
  • [43] Latitude variations of soil bacterial community diversity and composition in three typical forests of temperate, northeastern of China
    Fu, Xiao-Yu
    Cheng, Zhi-Chao
    Ni, Hong-Wei
    Zhang, Rong-Tao
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2023, 10
  • [44] Variations of soil bacterial community and denitrifier abundance with depth under different land-use types
    Han, Wanxue
    Wang, Fenghua
    Zhang, Linqi
    Zhao, Huicheng
    Zheng, Yuchong
    Sun, Ruibo
    Meng, Liang
    JOURNAL OF SOILS AND SEDIMENTS, 2023, 23 (04) : 1889 - 1900
  • [45] Land-use changes influence soil bacterial communities in a meadow grassland in Northeast China
    Cao, Chengyou
    Zhang, Ying
    Qian, Wei
    Liang, Caiping
    Wang, Congmin
    Tao, Shuang
    SOLID EARTH, 2017, 8 (05) : 1119 - 1129
  • [46] Soil moisture integrates the influence of land-use and season on soil microbial community composition in the Ethiopian highlands
    Ahmed, Iftekhar U.
    Mengistie, Hodaddis K.
    Godbold, Douglas L.
    Sanden, Hans
    APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY, 2019, 135 : 85 - 90
  • [47] Land-Use Effects on Soil Nutrient Cycling and Microbial Community Dynamics in the Everglades Agricultural Area, Florida
    Ye, Rongzhong
    Wright, Alan L.
    Inglett, Kanika
    Wang, Yu
    Ogram, Andy V.
    Reddy, K. R.
    COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2009, 40 (17-18) : 2725 - 2742
  • [48] From pine to pasture: land use history has long-term impacts on soil bacterial community composition and functional potential
    Hermans, Syrie M.
    Taylor, Matthew
    Grelet, Gwen
    Curran-Cournane, Fiona
    Buckley, Hannah L.
    Handley, Kim M.
    Lear, Gavin
    FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY, 2020, 96 (04)
  • [49] Tag-encoded pyrosequencing analysis of bacterial diversity in a single soil type as affected by management and land use
    Acosta-Martinez, V.
    Dowd, S.
    Sun, Y.
    Allen, V.
    SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2008, 40 (11) : 2762 - 2770
  • [50] Responses of soil bacterial community structure and function to dry-wet cycles more stable in paddy than in dryland agricultural ecosystems
    Qi, Jiejun
    Chen, Beibei
    Gao, Jiamin
    Peng, Ziheng
    Jiao, Shuo
    Wei, Gehong
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2022, 31 (02): : 362 - 377