Environmental and economic impact of electric vehicle adoption in the U.S

被引:35
作者
Chen, Zhenhua [1 ]
Carrel, Andre L. [1 ,2 ]
Gore, Christina [3 ]
Shi, Wei [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, City & Reg Planning Sect, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Civil Environm & Geodet Engn, Columbus, OH USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Dept Agr Environm & Dev Econ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[4] Ford Motor Co, Global Data Insight & Analyt, Dearborn, MI 48121 USA
[5] Ohio State Univ, Dearborn, MI 48121 USA
关键词
environmental impact; economic impact; electric vehicle; consumer choice; computable general equilibrium model;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/abe2d0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Battery electric vehicles (BEVs) have received increasing attention in recent years as BEV technical capabilities have rapidly developed. While many studies have attempted to investigate the societal impacts of BEV adoption, there is still a limited understanding of the extent to which widespread adoption of BEVs may affect both environmental and economic variables simultaneously. This study intends to address this research gap by conducting a comprehensive impact assessment of BEV adoption. Using demand estimates derived from a discrete choice experiment, the impact of various scenarios is evaluated using a computable general equilibrium model. Three drivers of BEV total cost of ownership are considered, namely, subsidy levels, cash incentives by manufacturers, and fuel costs. Furthermore, in light of current trends, improvements in BEV battery manufacturing productivity are considered. This research shows that changes in fuel price and incentives by manufacturers have relatively low impacts on GDP growth, but that the effect of subsidies on GDP and on BEV adoption is considerable, due to a stimulus effect on both household expenditures and on vehicle-manufacturing-related sectors. Productivity shocks moderately impact GDP but only affect BEV adoption in competitive markets. Conversely, the environmental impact is more nuanced. Although BEV adoption leads to decreases in tailpipe emissions, increased manufacturing activity as a result of productivity increases or subsidies can lead to growth in non-tailpipe emissions that cancels out some or all of the tailpipe emissions savings. This demonstrates that in order to achieve desired emissions reductions, policies to promote BEV adoption with subsidies should be accompanied by green manufacturing and green power generation initiatives.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Defining the rebound effect [J].
Berkhout, PHG ;
Muskens, JC ;
Velthuijsen, JW .
ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (6-7) :425-432
[2]   Incentives for promoting Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV) adoption in Norway [J].
Bjerkan, Kristin Ystmark ;
Norbech, Tom E. ;
Nordtomme, Marianne Elvsaas .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 43 :169-180
[3]   Do electric vehicles need subsidies? Ownership costs for conventional, hybrid, and electric vehicles in 14 US cities [J].
Breetz, Hanna L. ;
Salon, Deborah .
ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 120 :238-249
[4]   Economic resilience to transportation failure: a computable general equilibrium analysis [J].
Chen, Zhenhua ;
Rose, Adam .
TRANSPORTATION, 2018, 45 (04) :1009-1027
[5]   The impact of high-speed rail investment on economic and environmental change in China: A dynamic CGE analysis [J].
Chen, Zhenhua ;
Xue, Junbo ;
Rose, Adam Z. ;
Haynes, Kingsley E. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2016, 92 :232-245
[6]   Transportation Capital in the United States: A Multimodal General Equilibrium Analysis [J].
Chen, Zhenhua ;
Haynes, Kingsley E. .
PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT & POLICY, 2014, 19 (02) :97-117
[7]   MARKET-STRUCTURE AND PRICE-COST MARGINS [J].
CLARKE, R ;
DAVIES, SW .
ECONOMICA, 1982, 49 (195) :277-287
[8]   Electric vehicles revisited: a review of factors that affect adoption [J].
Coffman, Makena ;
Bernstein, Paul ;
Wee, Sherilyn .
TRANSPORT REVIEWS, 2017, 37 (01) :79-93
[9]  
Dixon P.B., 2002, Dynamic general equilibrium modelling for forecasting and policy: a practical guide and documentation of MONASH, V256, DOI [10.1108/S0573-8555(2001)256, DOI 10.1108/S0573-8555(2001)256]
[10]   Life Cycle Assessment of Environmental and Economic Impacts of Advanced Vehicles [J].
Gao, Lin ;
Winfield, Zach C. .
ENERGIES, 2012, 5 (03) :605-620