Determining the Statistical Significance of Relative Weights

被引:221
作者
Tonidandel, Scott [1 ]
LeBreton, James A. [2 ]
Johnson, Jeff W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Davidson Coll, Dept Psychol, Davidson, NC 28035 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Dept Psychol Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[3] Personnel Decis Res Inst, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
relative weights; relative importance; predictor importance; multiple regression; bootstrapping; MULTIPLE-REGRESSION; PARAMORPHIC REPRESENTATION; ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH; STRUCTURE COEFFICIENTS; DOMINANCE ANALYSIS; CLINICAL JUDGMENT; BOOTSTRAP; VARIABLES; PREDICTORS; NUMBER;
D O I
10.1037/a0017735
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Relative weight analysis is a procedure for estimating the relative importance of correlated predictors in a regression equation. Because the sampling distribution of relative weights is unknown, researchers using relative weight analysis are unable to make judgments regarding the statistical significance of the relative weights. J. W. Johnson (2004) presented a bootstrapping methodology to compute standard errors for relative weights, but this procedure cannot be used to determine whether a relative weight is significantly different from zero. This article presents a bootstrapping procedure that allows one to determine the statistical significance of a relative weight. The authors conducted a Monte Carlo study to explore the Type I error, power, and bias associated with their proposed technique. They illustrate this approach here by applying the procedure to published data.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 399
页数:13
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, An introduction to the bootstrap: CRC press
[2]  
[Anonymous], P 2007 INFORMS SIM S
[3]   Similarity on sports sidelines: How mentor-protege sex similarity affects mentoring [J].
Avery, Derek R. ;
Tonidandel, Scott ;
Phillips, McKensy G. .
SEX ROLES, 2008, 58 (1-2) :72-80
[4]   The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression [J].
Azen, R ;
Budescu, DV .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2003, 8 (02) :129-148
[5]   The relative contribution of formal and informal organizational work-family [J].
Behson, SJ .
JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2005, 66 (03) :487-500
[6]   A geometric approach to compare variables in a regression model [J].
Bring, J .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1996, 50 (01) :57-62
[7]   DOMINANCE ANALYSIS - A NEW APPROACH TO THE PROBLEM OF RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF PREDICTORS IN MULTIPLE-REGRESSION [J].
BUDESCU, DV .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1993, 114 (03) :542-551
[8]  
Courville T, 2001, EDUC PSYCHOL MEAS, V61, P229, DOI 10.1177/00131640121971211
[9]   MULTIPLE REGRESSION IN PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH AND PRACTICE [J].
DARLINGTON, RB .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1968, 69 (03) :161-+
[10]   Bootstrap confidence levels for phylogenetic trees [J].
Efron, B ;
Halloran, E ;
Holmes, S .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1996, 93 (14) :7085-7090