Guidance and/or Decision Coaching with Patient Decision Aids: Scoping Reviews to Inform the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS)

被引:37
|
作者
Rahn, Anne Christin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jull, Janet [4 ]
Boland, Laura [5 ,6 ]
Finderup, Jeanette [7 ,8 ,9 ,10 ]
Loiselle, Marie-Chantal [11 ]
Smith, Maureen [12 ]
Koepke, Sascha [13 ,14 ]
Stacey, Dawn [6 ,15 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lubeck, Nursing Res Unit, Inst Social Med & Epidemiol, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Lubeck, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Inst Neuroimmunol & Multiple Sclerosis INIMS, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Carl von Ossietzky Univ Oldenburg, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Oldenburg, Niedersachsen, Germany
[4] Queens Univ, Kingston, ON, Canada
[5] Western Univ, London, ON, Canada
[6] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[7] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Aarhus, Denmark
[8] Aarhus Univ, Aarhus, Denmark
[9] Aarhus Univ, ResCenPI Res Ctr Patient Involvement, Aarhus, Denmark
[10] Cent Denmark Reg, Aarhus, Denmark
[11] Univ Sherbrooke, Longueuil, PQ, Canada
[12] Cochrane Consumer, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[13] Univ Cologne, Inst Nursing Sci, Fac Med, Cologne, Germany
[14] Univ Hosp Cologne, Cologne, Germany
[15] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
guidance; decision coaching; patient decision aid; decision making; randomized controlled trials; conceptual models; shared decision making; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; MAKING MODELS; SUPPORT; WOMEN; MEN; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X21997330
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction In 2005, the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) collaboration identified guidance and decision coaching as important dimensions of patient decision aids (PtDAs) and developed a set of quality criteria. We sought to update definitions, theoretical rationale, and evidence for guidance and/or decision coaching used within or alongside PtDAs for the IPDAS update 2.0. Methods We conducted 2 scoping reviews on guidance and decision coaching, including systematic searches and a hand search of the Cochrane Review on PtDAs. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on guidance or decision coaching used with/alongside PtDAs. Data, including conceptual models, were summarized narratively and with meta-analyses when appropriate. Results Of 1022 citations, we found no RCTs that evaluated guidance in PtDAs. The 2013 definition for guidance was endorsed, and we made minimal changes to the description of guidance. Of 3039 citations, we identified 21 RCTs on decision coaching informed by 5 conceptual models stating that people exposed to decision coaching are more likely to progress in making informed decisions consistent with their values. Compared to usual care, decision coaching with PtDAs led to improved knowledge mean difference [MD], 19.5/100; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.0-29.0; 5 RCTs). Compared to decision coaching alone, PtDAs led to a small improvement in knowledge (MD, 3.6/100; 95% CI, 1.0-6.3; 3 RCTs). There were variable effects on other outcomes. We simplified the decision coaching definition slightly and defined minimal decision coaching elements. Conclusion We found no evidence on which to propose changes in guidance in IPDAS. Decision coaching is continuing to be used alongside PtDAs, but there is inadequate evidence on the added effectiveness compared to PtDAs alone. The decision coaching definition was updated with minimal elements.
引用
收藏
页码:938 / 953
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Systematic Development of Patient Decision Aids: An Update from the IPDAS Collaboration
    Witteman, Holly O.
    Maki, Kristin G.
    Vaisson, Gratianne
    Finderup, Jeanette
    Lewis, Krystina B.
    Dahl Steffensen, Karina
    Beaudoin, Caroline
    Comeau, Sandrine
    Volk, Robert J.
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2021, 41 (07) : 736 - 754
  • [2] Providing Balanced Information about Options in Patient Decision Aids: An Update from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards
    Martin, Richard W.
    Andersen, Stina Brogard
    O'Brien, Mary Ann
    Bravo, Paulina
    Hoffmann, Tammy
    Olling, Karina
    Shepherd, Heather L.
    Dankl, Kathrina
    Stacey, Dawn
    Steffensen, Karina Dahl
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2021, 41 (07) : 780 - 800
  • [3] Coaching and guidance with patient decision aids: A review of theoretical and empirical evidence
    Stacey, Dawn
    Kryworuchko, Jennifer
    Belkora, Jeff
    Davison, B. Joyce
    Durand, Marie-Anne
    Eden, Karen B.
    Hoffman, Aubri S.
    Koerner, Mirjam
    Legare, France
    Loiselle, Marie-Chantal
    Street, Richard L., Jr.
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2013, 13
  • [4] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Patient Decision Aids for Socially Disadvantaged Populations: Update from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IDPAS)
    Yen, Renata W.
    Smith, Jenna
    Engel, Jaclyn
    Muscat, Danielle Marie
    Smith, Sian K.
    Mancini, Julien
    Perestelo-Perez, Lilisbeth
    Elwyn, Glyn
    O'Malley, A. James
    Leyenaar, JoAnna K.
    Mac, Olivia
    Cadet, Tamara
    Giguere, Anik
    Housten, Ashley J.
    Langford, Aisha
    McCaffery, Kirsten
    Durand, Marie-Anne
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2021, 41 (07) : 870 - 896
  • [5] Decision coaching using a patient decision aid for youth and parents considering insulin delivery methods for type 1 diabetes: a pre/post study
    Lawson, Margaret L.
    Shephard, Allyson L.
    Feenstra, Bryan
    Boland, Laura
    Sourial, Nadia
    Stacey, Dawn
    BMC PEDIATRICS, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [6] Decision Coaching to Prepare Patients for Making Health Decisions: A Systematic Review of Decision Coaching in Trials of Patient Decision Aids
    Stacey, Dawn
    Kryworuchko, Jennifer
    Bennett, Carol
    Murray, Mary Ann
    Mullan, Sarah
    Legare, France
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2012, 32 (03) : E22 - E33
  • [7] What Works in Implementing Patient Decision Aids in Routine Clinical Settings? A Rapid Realist Review and Update from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration
    Joseph-Williams, Natalie
    Abhyankar, Purva
    Boland, Laura
    Bravo, Paulina
    Brenner, Alison T.
    Brodney, Suzanne
    Coulter, Angela
    Giguere, Anik
    Hoffman, Aubri
    Korner, Mirjam
    Langford, Aisha
    Legare, France
    Matlock, Daniel
    Moumjid, Nora
    Munro, Sarah
    Dahl Steffensen, Karina
    Stirling, Christine
    van der Weijden, Trudy
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2021, 41 (07) : 907 - 937
  • [8] Cultural adaptation and validation of patient decision aids: a scoping review
    Chenel, Vanessa
    Ben Mortenson, W.
    Guay, Manon
    Jutai, Jeffrey William
    Auger, Claudine
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2018, 12 : 321 - 332
  • [9] Developing and evaluating a patient decision aid for hormone therapy to manage symptoms of surgical menopause: the story behind the "SheEmpowers" patient decision aid
    Siyam, Tasneem
    Shivji, Alisha
    Ross, Sue
    Eurich, Dean T.
    Lavasanifar, Afsaneh
    Yuksel, Nese
    MENOPAUSE-THE JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN MENOPAUSE SOCIETY, 2021, 28 (02): : 157 - 166
  • [10] Comparison of analog and digital patient decision aids for the treatment of depression: a scoping review
    Sedlakova, Jana
    Westermair, Anna Lisa
    Biller-Andorno, Nikola
    Meier, Christoph A.
    Trachsel, Manuel
    FRONTIERS IN DIGITAL HEALTH, 2023, 5