Energy efficiency of ethanol production from cellulosic feedstock

被引:27
作者
Bansal, Ankit [1 ]
Illukpitiya, Prabodh [1 ]
Tegegne, Fisseha [1 ]
Singh, Surendra P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tennessee State Univ, Dept Agr & Environm Sci, Nashville, TN 37209 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Biofuel; Ethanol; Miscanthus; Net Energy Value; Switchgrass; NET ENERGY; SWITCHGRASS; MISCANTHUS; CROPS; BIOENERGY; GRASSES; IMPACT; COSTS; US;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.122
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Biofuel can be a potential supplement to fossil fuel and help in meeting increasing energy demand of the USA as well as rest of the world. However, it is important for the biofuel to be economically competitive and energy efficient to be established as a promising energy source. There has always been an argument about energy efficiency of biofuel production. Some studies have claimed that it requires more energy to produce ethanol then it actually produces as an output. The objective of the study is to determine energy efficiency of growing two potential cellulosic feedstock; switchgrass and Miscanthus and conversion them in to cellulosic ethanol. Energy efficiency was determined by calculating Net Energy Value (NEV), the difference between output energy obtained by ethanol and input energy used in producing ethanol. Input energy consisted of energy required to produce the cellulosic biomass, transporting it to the ethanol processing facility and processing cellulosic biomass in to ethanol. The analysis showed positive The NEV for both switchgrass and Miscanthus. NEV for Miscanthus (12.41 MJ/l of ethanol) was higher in compared to the switchgrass (7.90 MJ/l of ethanol). Monitory benefits of energy savings were also estimated to determine the impact of energy saving to the society. Results from this research showed both switchgrass and Miscanthus as potential biomass feedstock for cellulosic ethanol production. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 146
页数:6
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Adusumilli N.C., 2013, ENERGY BALANCE CELLU
[2]  
[Anonymous], P 4 BIENN INT WORKSH
[3]  
[Anonymous], ANLESDTM163 US DEP E
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, C PAPER
[5]  
[Anonymous], 53 GTAP
[6]  
[Anonymous], EN RES GROUP BIOF AN
[7]   Environmental impact assessment of regional switchgrass feedstock production comparing nitrogen input scenarios and legume-intercropping systems [J].
Ashworth, Amanda J. ;
Taylor, Adam M. ;
Reed, Daniel L. ;
Allen, Fred L. ;
Keyser, Patrick D. ;
Tyler, Donald D. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 87 :227-234
[8]  
Bhat M.G., 1994, ENERGY SYNTHETIC FER
[9]  
Caslin B., 2011, Miscanthus best practice guidelines
[10]   Biomass Storage Options Influence Net Energy and Emissions of Cellulosic Ethanol [J].
Emery, Isaac ;
Dunn, Jennifer B. ;
Han, Jeongwoo ;
Wang, Michael .
BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2015, 8 (02) :590-604