The right to die as the triumph of autonomy

被引：31
作者：
Beauchamp, Tom L. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Georgetown Univ, Kennedy Inst Eth, Washington, DC 20057 USA
来源：
JOURNAL OF MEDICINE AND PHILOSOPHY | 2006年 / 31卷 / 06期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1080/03605310601096619
中图分类号：
B82 [伦理学（道德学）];
学科分类号：
摘要：
[No abstract available]
引用
收藏
页码：643 / 654
页数：12
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Angell M, 1993, Trends Health Care Law Ethics, V8, P17
[2]   The Supreme Court and physician-assisted suicide - The ultimate right [J].
Angell, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 336 (01) :50-53
[3]   WHEN PROCEDURES LIMIT RIGHTS - FROM QUINLAN TO CONROY [J].
ANNAS, GJ .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1985, 15 (02) :24-26
[4]  
ARRAS J, 1996, BIOLAW
[5]  
BEAUCHAMP TL, 1996, INTENDING DEATH
[6]   VOLUNTARY ACTIVE EUTHANASIA [J].
BROCK, DW .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1992, 22 (02) :10-+
[7]  
DOWBIGGIN I, 2003, MERCIFUL END EUTHANS
[8]  
Gostin Lawrence O, 1993, J Law Med Ethics, V21, P94, DOI 10.1111/j.1748-720X.1993.tb01234.x
[9]   Deciding life and death in the courtroom - From Quinlan to Cruzan, Glucksberg, and Vacco - A brief history and analysis of constitutional protection of the 'right to die' [J].
Gostin, LO .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 278 (18) :1523-1528
[10]   Five years of legal physician-assisted suicide in Oregon [J].
Hedberg, K ;
Hopkins, D ;
Kohn, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 348 (10) :961-964
123