Systematic review of the use of translated patient-reported outcome measures in cancer trials

被引:20
作者
Slade, A. L. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Retzer, A. [1 ]
Ahmed, K. [5 ]
Kyte, D. [1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ]
Keeley, T. [7 ]
Armes, J. [6 ,8 ,9 ]
Brown, J. M. [10 ]
Calman, L. [6 ,11 ]
Gavin, A. [6 ,12 ]
Glaser, A. W. [6 ,13 ]
Greenfield, D. M. [6 ,14 ]
Lanceley, A. [6 ,15 ]
Taylor, R. M. [6 ,16 ]
Velikova, G. [13 ]
Turner, G. [1 ]
Calvert, M. J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,17 ,18 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Ctr Patient Reported Outcomes Res, Inst Appl Hlth Res, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, Natl Inst Hlth Res NIHR Birmingham Biomed Res Ctr, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[4] Univ Birmingham, Natl Inst Hlth Res Surg Reconstruct & Microbiol R, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[5] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham Clin Trials Unit, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[6] Natl Canc Res Inst NCRI Psychosocial Oncol & Surv, London, England
[7] GlaxoSmithKline, Patient Ctr Outcomes, Brentford, England
[8] Univ Surrey, Sch Hlth Sci, Guildford, Surrey, England
[9] NIHR Appl Res Collaborat Kent Surrey & Sussex Uni, Guildford, Surrey, England
[10] Univ Leeds, Clin Trials Res Unit, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[11] Univ Southampton, Macmillan Survivorship Res Grp, Hlth Sci, Highfield Campus, Southampton, Hants, England
[12] Queens Univ Belfast, Northern Ireland Canc Registry, Ctr Publ Hlth, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[13] St Jamess Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Med Res, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[14] Sheffield Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[15] UCL, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Inst Womens Hlth, London, England
[16] Univ Coll London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Canc Clin Trials Unit, London, England
[17] Univ Birmingham, Natl Inst Hlth Res Appl Res Collaborat, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[18] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham Hlth Partners Ctr Regulatory Sci & Inn, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs); Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs); Ethnicity; Recruitment; Cross-cultural translation; Clinical trials; Trial protocols; Primary outcomes; Secondary outcomes; TASK-FORCE; TRASTUZUMAB EMTANSINE; PRO; CHEMOTHERAPY; EVEROLIMUS; PREFERENCE; SUNITINIB; VALIDITY; THERAPY; LUNG;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-021-05255-z
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BackgroundPatient-reported outcomes (PROs) are used in clinical trials to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of interventions. Inclusion of participants from different ethnic backgrounds is essential for generalisability of cancer trial results. PRO data collection should include appropriately translated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to minimise missing data and sample attrition.MethodsProtocols and/or publications from cancer clinical trials using a PRO endpoint and registered on the National Institute for Health Research Portfolio were systematically reviewed for information on recruitment, inclusion of ethnicity data, and use of appropriately translated PROMs. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with key stakeholders to explore barriers and facilitators for optimal PRO trial design, diverse recruitment and reporting, and use of appropriately translated PROMs.ResultsEighty-four trials met the inclusion criteria, only 14 (17%) (n=4754) reported ethnic group data, and ethnic group recruitment was low, 611 (13%). Although 8 (57%) studies were multi-centred and multi-national, none reported using translated PROMs, although available for 7 (88%) of the studies.Interviews with 44 international stakeholders identified a number of perceived barriers to ethnically diverse recruitment including diverse participant engagement, relevance of ethnicity to research question, prominence of PROs, and need to minimise investigator burden. Stakeholders had differing opinions on the use of translated PROMs, the impact of trial designs, and recruitment strategies on diverse recruitment. Facilitators of inclusive research were described and examples of good practice identified.ConclusionsGreater transparency is required when PROs are used as primary or secondary outcomes in clinical trials. Protocols and publications should demonstrate that recruitment was accessible to diverse populations and facilitated by trial design, recruitment strategies, and appropriate PROM usage. The use of translated PROMs should be made explicit when used in cancer clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Systematic evaluation of patientreported outcome (PRO) protocol content and reporting in UK cancer clinical trials: the EPiC study protocol [J].
Ahmed, Khaled ;
Kyte, Derek ;
Keeley, Thomas ;
Efficace, Fabio ;
Armes, Jo ;
Brown, Julia M. ;
Calman, Lynn ;
Copland, Chris ;
Gavin, Anna ;
Glaser, Adam ;
Greenfield, Diana M. ;
Lanceley, Anne ;
Taylor, Rachel ;
Velikova, Galina ;
Brundage, Michael ;
Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca ;
King, Madeleine T. ;
Calvert, Melanie .
BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (09)
[2]   The Use of Patient-reported Outcomes (PRO) Within Comparative Effectiveness Research Implications for Clinical Practice and Health Care Policy [J].
Ahmed, Sara ;
Berzon, Richard A. ;
Revicki, Dennis A. ;
Lenderking, William R. ;
Moinpour, Carol M. ;
Basch, Ethan ;
Reeve, Bryce B. ;
Wu, Albert W. .
MEDICAL CARE, 2012, 50 (12) :1060-1070
[3]   Everolimus versus sunitinib for patients with metastatic non-clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ASPEN): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2 trial [J].
Armstrong, Andrew J. ;
Halabi, Susan ;
Eisen, Tim ;
Broderick, Samuel ;
Stadler, Walter M. ;
Jones, Robert J. ;
Garcia, Jorge A. ;
Vaishampayan, Ulka N. ;
Picus, Joel ;
Hawkins, Robert E. ;
Hainsworth, John D. ;
Kollmannsberger, Christian K. ;
Logan, Theodore F. ;
Puzanov, Igor ;
Pickering, Lisa M. ;
Ryan, Christopher W. ;
Protheroe, Andrew ;
Lusk, Christine M. ;
Oberg, Sadie ;
George, Daniel J. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2016, 17 (03) :378-388
[4]   Assessment of patient-reported adverse events after discharge from hospital in RCTs in gastrointestinal cancer surgery: is there sufficient coverage in existing EORTC questionnaires? [J].
Avery, Kerry ;
Francischetto, Elaine O'Connell ;
Velikova, Galina ;
Blazeby, Jane .
TRIALS, 2015, 16
[5]  
Bartlett C, 2005, HEALTH TECHNOL ASSES, V9, P1
[6]   Patient versus clinician symptom reporting using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events: results of a questionnaire-based study [J].
Basch, Ethan ;
Iasonos, Alexia ;
McDonough, Tiffani ;
Barz, Allison ;
Culkin, Ann ;
Kris, Mark G. ;
Scher, Howard I. ;
Schrag, Deborah .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2006, 7 (11) :903-909
[7]   Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up for patients treated for stage-I endometrial cancer (ENDCAT trial): a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial [J].
Beaver, K. ;
Williamson, S. ;
Sutton, C. ;
Hollingworth, W. ;
Gardner, A. ;
Allton, B. ;
Abdel-Aty, M. ;
Blackwood, K. ;
Burns, S. ;
Curwen, D. ;
Ghani, R. ;
Keating, P. ;
Murray, S. ;
Tomlinson, A. ;
Walker, B. ;
Willett, M. ;
Wood, N. ;
Martin-Hirsch, P. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 124 (01) :150-160
[8]   Dangers in Using Translated Medical Questionnaires The Importance of Conceptual Equivalence Across Languages and Cultures in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures [J].
Breugelmans, Raoul .
CHEST, 2009, 136 (04) :1175-1177
[9]   Guidelines for Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trial Protocols The SPIRIT-PRO Extension [J].
Calvert, Melanie ;
Kyte, Derek ;
Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca ;
Slade, Anita ;
Chan, An-Wen ;
King, Madeleine T. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 319 (05) :483-494
[10]   Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Assessment in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Guidance for Trial Protocol Writers [J].
Calvert, Melanie ;
Kyte, Derek ;
Duffy, Helen ;
Gheorghe, Adrian ;
Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca ;
Ives, Jonathan ;
Draper, Heather ;
Brundage, Michael ;
Blazeby, Jane ;
King, Madeleine .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (10)