The effect of low-complexity patients on emergency department waiting times

被引:166
作者
Schull, Michael J.
Kiss, Alex
Szalai, John-Paul
机构
[1] Inst Clin Evaluat Sci, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[2] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Clin Epidemiol Unit, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[3] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Emergency Serv, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.06.027
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: The extent to which patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) with minor conditions contribute to delays and crowding is controversial. To test this question, we study the effect of low-complexity ED patients on the waiting times of other patients. Methods: We obtained administrative records on all ED visits to Ontario hospitals from April 2002 to March 2003. For each ED, we determined the association between the number of new low-complexity patients (defined as ambulatory arrival, low-acuity triage level, and discharged) presenting in each 8-hour interval and the mean ED length of stay and time to first physician contact for medium- and high-complexity patients. Covariates were the number of new high- and medium-complexity patients, mean patient age, sex distribution, hospital teaching status, work shift, weekday/weekend, and total patient-hours. Autoregression modeling was used given correlation in the data. Results: One thousand ninety-five consecutive 8-hour intervals at 110 EDs were analyzed; 4.1 million patient visits occurred, 50.8% of patients were women, and mean age was 38.4 years. Low-, medium-, and high-complexity patients represented 50.9%, 37.1%, and 12% of all patients, respectively. Mean (median) ED length of stay was 6.3 (4.7), 3.9 (2.8), and 2.2 (1.6) hours for high-, medium-, and low-complexity patients, respectively, and mean (median) time to first physician contact was 1.1 (0.7), 1.3 (0.9), and 1.1 (0.8) hours. In adjusted analyses, every 10 low-complexity patients arriving per 8 hours was associated with a 5.4-minute (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.2 to 6.0 minutes) increase in mean length of stay and a 2.1-minute (95% Cl 1.8 to 2.4 minutes) increase in mean time to first physician contact for medium- and high-complexity patients. Results were similar regardless of ED volume and teaching status. Conclusion: Low-complexity ED patients are associated with a negligible increase in ED length of stay and time to first physician contact for other ED patients. Reducing the number of low-complexity ED patients is unlikely to reduce waiting times for other patients or lessen crowding.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 264
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[11]   PROSPECTIVE IDENTIFICATION AND TRIAGE OF NONEMERGENCY PATIENTS OUT OF AN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT - A 5-YEAR STUDY [J].
DERLET, RW ;
KINSER, D ;
RAY, L ;
HAMILTON, B ;
MCKENZIE, J .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1995, 25 (02) :215-223
[12]   Patients' perspective on choosing the emergency department for nonurgent medical care: A qualitative study exploring one reason for overcrowding [J].
Howard, MS ;
Davis, BA ;
Anderson, C ;
Cherry, D ;
Koller, P ;
Shelton, D .
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY NURSING, 2005, 31 (05) :429-435
[13]   Deja Vu [J].
Kellermann, AL .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2000, 35 (01) :83-85
[14]   REFUSING CARE TO EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT PATIENTS - EVALUATION OF PUBLISHED TRIAGE GUIDELINES [J].
LOWE, RA ;
BINDMAN, AB ;
ULRICH, SK ;
NORMAN, G ;
SCALETTA, TA ;
KEANE, D ;
WASHINGTON, D ;
GRUMBACH, K .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1994, 23 (02) :286-293
[15]  
Martin Alison, 2002, J Health Serv Res Policy, V7, P160, DOI 10.1258/135581902760082463
[16]  
McCaig Linda F, 2004, Adv Data, P1
[17]  
Murray Michael, 2004, CJEM, V6, P421
[18]  
Murray MJ, 2004, CAN J EMERG MED, V6, P180
[19]   Statistical methodology: V. Time series analysis using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models [J].
Nelson, BK .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1998, 5 (07) :739-744
[20]  
*NZ HLTH TECHN ASS, 1998, EM DEP ATT CRIT APPR, P1