Can artificial intelligence be decolonized?

被引:62
作者
Adams, Rachel [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Human Sci Res Council, Pretoria, South Africa
[2] Univ London, Informat Law & Policy Ctr, Inst Adv Legal Studies, London, England
关键词
STATE;
D O I
10.1080/03080188.2020.1840225
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
AI is altering not only local and global society, but what it means to be human, or, to be counted as such. In the midst of concerns about the ethics of AI, calls are emerging for AI to be decolonized. What does the decolonization of AI imply? This article explores this question, writing from the post-colony of South Africa where the imbrications of race, colonialism and technology have been experienced and debated in ways that hold global meaning and relevance for this discussion. Proceeding in two parts, this article explores the notion of de/coloniality and its emphasis on undoing legacies of colonialism and logics of race, before critiquing two major discontents of AI today: ethics as a colonial rationality and racializing dividing practices. This article develops a critical basis from which to articulate a question that sits exterior to current AI practice and its critical discourses: can AI be decolonized?
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 197
页数:22
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]  
Abbott J.Z., 2019, A focus on neural machine translation for African languages
[2]  
Achiume E.Tendayi., 2020, SPEC RAPP CONT FORMS
[3]  
Adams Rachel., 2020, Transparency: New trajectories in law, V1
[4]  
Adams Rachel., 2019, HELEN ALOY OTHER TAL
[5]  
Adams Rachel., 2019, Computer Law and Security Review
[6]  
Adebisi F. I, 2019, Why I say 'decolonisation is impossible'
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2011, AFRICA LIVING LAB EM
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2021, IDENTIFICATION CITIZ
[9]  
Appadurai A., 1993, ORIENTALISM POSTCOLO, P314
[10]  
Arun Chinmayi., 2019, The Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI