Mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock supported with VA ECMO: A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the impact of etiology on 29,289 patients

被引:70
作者
Alba, Ana C. [1 ]
Foroutan, Farid [1 ]
Buchan, Tayler A. [1 ]
Alvarez, Juglans [1 ]
Kinsella, Aisling [1 ]
Clark, Kathryn [1 ]
Zhu, Alice [1 ]
Lau, Kimberley [1 ]
McGuinty, Caroline [1 ]
Aleksova, Natasha [1 ]
Francis, Troy [2 ]
Stanimirovic, Aleksandra [2 ]
Vishram-Nielsen, Julie [1 ]
Malik, Abdullah [1 ]
Ross, Heather J. [1 ]
Fan, Eddy [3 ]
Rac, Valeria E. [1 ]
Rao, Vivek [1 ]
Billia, Filio [1 ]
机构
[1] Peter Munk Cardiac Ctr, Ted Rogers Ctr Excellence, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto Hlth Econ & Technol Assessment THETA Coll, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Interdept Div Crit Care Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; cardiogenic shock; etiology; mortality; meta-analysis; EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE-OXYGENATION; MYOCARDITIS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.healun.2021.01.009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) is associated with variable outcomes. In this meta-analysis, we evaluated the mortality after VA ECMO across multiple etiologies of cardiogenic shock (CS). METHODS: In June 2019, we performed a systematic search selecting observational studies with >= 10 adult patients reporting on short-term mortality (30-day or mortality at discharge) after initiation of VA ECMO by CS etiology published after 2009. We performed meta-analyses using random effect models and used metaregression to evaluate mortality across CS etiology. RESULTS: We included 306 studies (29,289 patients): 25 studies on after heart transplantation (HTx) (771 patients), 13 on myocarditis (906 patients), 33 on decompensated heart failure (HF) (3,567 patients), 64 on after cardiotomy shock (8,231 patients), 10 on pulmonary embolism (PE) (221 patients), 80 on acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (7,774 patients), and 113 on after cardiac arrest [CA] (7,814 patients). With moderate certainty on effect estimates, we observed significantly different mortality estimates for various etiologies (p < 0.001), which is not explained by differences in age and sex across studies: 35% (95% CI: 29-42) for after HTx, 40% (95% CI: 33-46) for myocarditis, 53% (95% CI: 46-59) for HF, 52% (95% CI: 38-66) for PE, 59% (95% CI: 56-63) for cardiotomy, 60% (95% CI: 57-64) for AMI, 64% (95% CI: 59-69) for post. in-hospital CA, and 76% (95% CI: 69-82) for post-out. of-hospital CA. Univariable metaregression showed that variation in mortality estimates within etiology group was partially explained by population age, proportion of females, left ventricle venting, and CA. CONCLUSIONS: Using an overall estimate of mortality for patients with CS requiring VA ECMO is inadequate given the differential outcomes by etiology. To further refine patient selection and management to improve outcomes, additional studies evaluating patient characteristics impacting outcomes by specific CS etiology are needed. (C) 2021 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:260 / 268
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [21] Precardiogenic Shock A New Clinical Entity
    Singh, Twinkle
    Samson, Rohan
    Ayinapudi, Karnika
    Motwani, Ayush
    Le Jemtel, Thierry H.
    [J]. CARDIOLOGY IN REVIEW, 2019, 27 (04) : 198 - 201
  • [22] Current real-life use of vasopressors and inotropes in cardiogenic shock - adrenaline use is associated with excess organ injury and mortality
    Tarvasmaki, Tuukka
    Lassus, Johan
    Varpula, Marjut
    Sionis, Alessandro
    Sund, Reijo
    Kober, Lars
    Spinar, Jindrich
    Parissis, John
    Banaszewski, Marek
    Cardoso, Jose Silva
    Carubelli, Valentina
    Di Somma, Salvatore
    Mebazaa, Alexandre
    Harjola, Veli-Pekka
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2016, 20
  • [23] Management of cardiogenic shock
    Thiele, Holger
    Ohman, E. Magnus
    Desch, Steffen
    Eitel, Ingo
    de Waha, Suzanne
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 36 (20) : 1223 - 1230
  • [24] Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Use in Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States, 2000 to 2014
    Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra
    Prasad, Abhiram
    Bell, Malcolm R.
    Sandhu, Gurpreet S.
    Eleid, Mackram F.
    Dunlay, Shannon M.
    Schears, Gregory J.
    Stulak, John M.
    Singh, Mandeep
    Gersh, Bernard J.
    Jaffe, Allan S.
    Holmes, David R., Jr.
    Rihal, Charanjit S.
    Barsness, Gregory W.
    [J]. CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2019, 12 (12)
  • [25] Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
    van Diepen, Sean
    Katz, Jason N.
    Albert, Nancy M.
    Henry, Timothy D.
    Jacobs, Alice K.
    Kapur, Navin K.
    Kilic, Ahmet
    Menon, Venu
    Ohman, E. Magnus
    Sweitzer, Nancy K.
    Thiele, Holger
    Washam, Jeffrey B.
    Cohen, Mauricio G.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2017, 136 (16) : E232 - E268
  • [26] Cardiogenic Shock
    Vandatpour, Cyrus
    Collins, David
    Goldberg, Sheldon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2019, 8 (08):
  • [27] Comparison of extracorporeal and conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A meta-analysis of 2260 patients with cardiac arrest
    Wang, Gan-nan
    Chen, Xu-feng
    Qiao, Li
    Mei, Yong
    Lv, Jin-ru
    Huang, Xi-hua
    Shen, Bin
    Zhang, Jin-song
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 8 (01) : 5 - 11
  • [28] Clinical Outcomes of Adult Patients Who Receive Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Postcardiotomy Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wang, Liangshan
    Wang, Hong
    Hou, Xiaotong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2018, 32 (05) : 2087 - 2093
  • [29] Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Cardiogenic Shock and Cardiac Arrest: A Meta-Analysis
    Xie, Ashleigh
    Phan, Kevin
    Tsai, Yi-Chin
    Yan, Tristan D.
    Forrest, Paul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2015, 29 (03) : 637 - 645