Research status of shale gas: A review

被引:99
作者
Wang, Qiang [1 ]
Li, Rongrong [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr Huadong, Sch Econ & Management, 66 West Changjiang Rd, Qingdao 266580, Peoples R China
关键词
Bibliometric analysis; Shale gas; Collaboration network; Authorship collaboration; BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS; RESEARCH TRENDS; CHINA; NETWORK; SCIENCE; COLLABORATION; INFORMATION; TECHNOLOGY; REVOLUTION; AMERICA;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.007
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The shale gas revolution has resulted in a sharp growth in the number of researchers and collaborative work in this area, particularly during the past few decades. This study aims to provide unprecedented and invaluable shale gas information to businesses, policymakers, and any part of society involved in shale gas development. Using bibliometric and collaboration techniques, our study focuses (on an individual level) on the development trends in shale gas research. We examine the most influential authors and explore the characteristics and implications of collaboration networks and patterns in shale gas literature between 1990 and 2014. Much of our information was obtained from the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) database. Author collaboration analysis software that has been independently developed was used to further explain core author contributions and trends, as well as collaboration networks. We primarily focus on three research areas: (1) the quantity and growth trend of the number of authors exploring shale gas, (2) author productivity distribution, and (3) an analysis of author collaboration networks. First, our results reveal three developmental stages. The period from 1990 to 2008 was the early stage and characterized by steady development. The years between 2008 and 2013 witnessed rapid growth, before that growth slowed notably after 2013. The annual growth rate of the number of new authors was determined to be approximately 980%. This finding also indicates that shale gas is becoming a fast-developing and popular research topic. Furthermore, Horsfield B from the German Research Centre for Geosciences has been the dominant contributor to date, followed by Krooss BM and Ballice L. The top 15 authors are mainly from Germany, the USA, Canada, Estonia, Jordan, and China. Our collaboration network and pattern analysis reveals that the two biggest clusters of cooperation are comprised of Horsfield B and Ballice L. We also discovered that most authors have a specific collaboration, such as that between Williams PT and Jaber JO, both of whom are from the Al-Ahliyya Amman University.
引用
收藏
页码:715 / 720
页数:6
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Research on health inequalities in Latin America and the Caribbean: Bibliometric analysis (1971-2000) and descriptive content analysis (1971-1995) [J].
Almeida-Filho, N ;
Kawachi, I ;
Pellegrini, A ;
Dachs, JNW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2003, 93 (12) :2037-2043
[2]  
Arthur J.D., 2008, All Consulting, P14
[3]   Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level [J].
Bercovitz, Janet ;
Feldman, Maryann .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2008, 19 (01) :69-89
[4]   New horizon in energy: Shale gas [J].
Bilgen, Selcuk ;
Sarikaya, Ikbal .
JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 35 :637-645
[5]   Information and political engagement in America: The search for effects of information technology at the individual level [J].
Bimber, B .
POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2001, 54 (01) :53-67
[6]   The Shale Gas Revolution: U.S. and EU Policy and Research Agendas [J].
Boersma, Tim ;
Johnson, Corey .
REVIEW OF POLICY RESEARCH, 2012, 29 (04) :570-576
[7]  
Borgman CL, 2016, DATA DATA CITATION B
[8]   The rise of Network Ecology: Maps of the topic diversity and scientific collaboration [J].
Borrett, Stuart R. ;
Moody, James ;
Edelmann, Achim .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2014, 293 :111-127
[9]  
BP, 2015, EM DAT GLOB ATM RES, DOI DOI 10.2904/EDGARV4.2
[10]   Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance [J].
Braun, T ;
Schubert, A ;
Zsindely, S .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 1997, 38 (02) :321-325